Why isn t a house with a good environment worth the money?

The environment is good, there are many reasons for not being worthy, such as the interior decoration, the decoration of the room is not high, as well as the geographical environment, traffic, orientation and other factors, especially the rural house, ** is not high, and the second-hand house is in the more traditional concept of people, is used by others, lived, unlucky. The better the location, the higher the house price, the house price depends on the location, and when you buy a commercial house, most of them will still consider the location of the house, such as the appreciation potential of the purchased community, whether it is close to work, and whether there are schools, shopping malls, hospitals and other supporting facilities around. Whether there is transportation, whether there are subways, bus lines, etc.

The property in the community is good, the health situation and the vehicle parking will be more orderly The house also has certain advantages, the personnel are not mixed, and there will be no hidden dangers in terms of safety. The security of the community, the management of parking spaces, the transportation of garbage, the cleaning of corridors, and the management and repair of housing facilities are handled by special personnel. There is also the orientation, everyone will like to sit in the north-facing south-facing position, and the south-facing master bedroom is the favorite layout of the buyer's traditional concept, which is also in line with the living comfort.

Whether the environment is good or not is an objective factor, whether the house is worth it depends on where the house is? It's not that the house is worth money when the environment is good, but that the house is worth it when the place is good.

Generally, this kind of house is more or less remote and inexpensive.

The environment is good, it does not mean that the house is good.

I think that as more and more houses are built in small cities, urbanization gets better and better, and houses will definitely become less and less valuable. This is determined by the relationship between supply and demand, first, because the size of the city is not necessarily related to the level of housing prices, second, because houses in well-developed small cities will be very popular, and third, because only houses in cities with poor conditions will be worthless.

The first reason is that there is no correlation between the size of the city and the price of housing. It is a very clear fact that whether a house in a city is worth money or not is closely related to the state of the city. But that doesn't mean that a house in a small city isn't worth much.

There is no correlation between the size of a city and the price of a city. The factor that is really closely related to the ** of the house is the state of development of the city. Only if the city is in good condition can the city house be more valuable.

The second reason is that well-developed houses in small cities will be very popular. Small cities seem to have limited conditions and lack of attractiveness. There are small but well-developed cities that are very popular with small but well-developed cities.

In addition, although the economic development status of some small cities is not too high, the urban environment is very good, the livability is very high, and it is very comfortable to live in such a city, and the houses in this small city will be very popular.

The third reason is that only a house in a city with poor conditions will be worthless. For a city with good conditions, the development is good and the city is vibrant, and the houses in the city will be very popular. However, for those cities with poor conditions and unsatisfactory development status, few people pay attention to the houses in these cities due to various reasons such as limited economic conditions and a decrease in the number of residents.

All in all, this situation does exist in some small cities that are not in a good state of development. Houses in these small cities are indeed going to become less and less valuable.

Houses in many cities are becoming less and less valuable. I think the main points are as follows: 1. According to the 2019 China Fertility Report, China's new birth population in 2018 was about 15 million, a decrease of nearly 13% compared with the past, and the fertility rate was far below the international normal level.

In the next two or three decades, the Chinese population will reach its peak.

Negative population growth will also have a great impact on the economy, at present China's industrial production is mostly labor-intensive, mainly relying on the population advantage to make money, if the population growth is negative, the population advantage will no longer exist, China's economy will decline sharply. The economic downturn will also have a significant impact on the real estate economy.

Moreover, due to the complete supporting facilities and business opportunities in large cities, many people are concentrated in large cities, and the negative population growth will make more and more people in big cities and fewer people in small towns, which will eventually lead to the concentration of all the population in large cities, and the population of small and medium-sized cities around large cities will be less and less, resulting in a decrease in real estate demand in small and medium-sized cities, and smaller and smaller property values. Second, inheritance leads to a decrease in people's demand for a house. Many parents of our generation have self-built houses or have a house, so the demand for real estate in their next generation has also decreased, which has led to the supply of houses exceeding the demand, and the ** of real estate is constantly decreasing.

Therefore, in small and medium-sized cities, if you don't just need a house, there is no need to invest in many sets.

Recently, the official announced that the total number of completed residential buildings for sale in China is 6 billion, which has attracted the attention of many netizens. Among them, will a large number of houses in small cities become less and less valuable? Overall, this is an interesting question, and once China's housing stock reaches the level of 600 million units, there will be significant changes in the domestic real estate market, especially in smaller cities.

Theoretically, houses in small cities do suffer. This is because the use of small cities is relatively simple, and there are no diversified functions like large cities, and the income level of residents in small cities is also lower, the level of housing prices is also low, and the demand for houses is relatively small, so with the increase in real estate accumulation, housing prices in small cities will be negatively affected. In addition, with the acceleration of urbanization in China, the flow of people around the country will also accelerate, more people go to live in large cities will make the housing prices in large cities continue to be **, which will make the housing prices in small cities fall even more, because more people go to big cities to buy houses, big city house prices**, more house loss, small city housing prices are more likely to decline.

In addition, if the policy support of small cities is not effective and the investment pull is limited, housing prices in small cities will also face the highest risk. In order to develop the economy, some small cities give investors a large amount of subsidies to allow investors to invest, but if the investment subsidies are tightened, such investors will transfer their funds to large cities, and housing prices in small cities will be affected.

In short, the official disclosure of "there are 600 million houses in the country", and houses in small cities may indeed become less and less valuable, which is an inevitable reality, because the use of small cities is relatively single, the income level is low, the demand for houses is small, the acceleration of urbanization in China, more people go to live in big cities, and the tightening of investment subsidies, etc., will make housing prices in small cities negatively affected, and housing prices will continue to **.