Why does Han Han s eloquence not match his writing level?

There are a lot of people who write beautifully and are taciturn and not very eloquent. Writing is a thing that takes a long time, is systematic, and the logical process is very clear, especially the essays that Han Han is good at. And things like talking and speaking are all improvised.

Many writers even clarify their own ideas while writing. Han Han's article is good at tricky opinions, there may not be many dry goods, and the book bag can't be dropped, and the angle is ingenious, which is refreshing. His ** is also, his personal style is strong, highlighting the atmosphere and mood, anyway, I don't think his storytelling skills are very clever.

There are a lot of people who write beautifully and are taciturn and not very eloquent. Writing is a thing that takes a long time, is systematic, and the logical process is very clear, especially the essays that Han Han is good at. And things like talking and speaking are all improvised.

Many writers even clarify their own ideas while writing. Han Han's article is good at tricky opinions, there may not be many dry goods, and the book bag can't be dropped, and the angle is ingenious, which is refreshing. His ** is also, his personal style is strong, highlighting the atmosphere and mood, anyway, I don't think his storytelling skills are very clever.

Han Han is no longer the "migrant worker version of Nicholas Tse", a self-styled teenager who opposed exam-oriented education, he knows the country and the hearts of the people better than 99% of people, and knows himself better. From the unscrupulous words of the year to the active participation in public affairs later, to the "Han San" that thinks about the fate of the entire country and the nation, and then to the discovery that he was used as a gun, the people just seem to be eager for freedom but actually prefer to be coaxing spectators, and finally to the timely transformation to make movies and make a fortune in silence, Han Han is proving a truth every step of the way: do the right thing at the right age and time.

He is a smart man and a good person, he knows people's hearts very well, cares about his family and country, but knows how to protect himself, although he made a rough debut, but he knows how to polish, such a writer is suitable for readers to grow up with him. Why do many people still say that Han Han is just a literary half-ass? A small part is because I really don't like Han Han, part of it is because I have never read his books and have been misled by the "rebellious" image set up by **, and some are because I have only read his early works and have not updated them for many years.

It's very simple, eloquence is his, writing is not. "Four or two dry pieces", "Jingye rude", "cone" ......Need you say anything?

There are few writers who are eloquent, Jia Pingwa, Mo Yan, Lu Yao, etc. are eloquent? He's a good writer, okay?