How social situations influence an individual s behavior

When we go through some events, there is always endless analysis and discussion of why the event happened. If an employee's productivity decreases, do we infer that this is because the employee is lazy, or because the environment in which they work is worse? Does a little boy hit a classmate to show that he was unkind, or is it his counterattack to his continued provocations?

When your partner is late for your date, do you think he doesn't care about you, or do you think there's a real traffic jam on the road?

Our judgment of others depends on how we interpret their behavior, and based on our interpretations, we interpret someone's overtures as genuine friendliness or false greetings. Attribution theory helps us understand the mechanism by which this explanation works.

Researchers of attribution theory have found that there is a common problem when people attribute to attribution. When we interpret the behavior of others, we underestimate the impact of the environment and overestimate the influence of the traits and attitudes of others, we feel that people fall because they are clumsy and not because they have tripped, and we feel that people are speeding past us on the highway because they are aggressive, not because they are late for a meeting or work.

People often think that the people who test others are very smart, such as teachers and TV quiz show hosts, and when some of these students grow up to become teachers, they are surprised to find that the teacher is not as intelligent as they originally thought.

When we attribute the behavior of others, we underestimate situational factors and influence our own behavior.

If we are angry ourselves, it is because the situation makes us so angry that when we see someone angry, we feel that he does not seem to have a good temper. When we are appreciated for a behavior, we attribute it to our own merits, and when the results are less than ideal or even worse, we are more likely to attribute the behavior to external circumstances.

If the social environment is not good, then the employee's mood must be very bad, and it is easy to think about the work and low efficiency.

1. Spontaneity of behavior.

The external environmental factors can affect the direction and intensity of individual behavior, but cannot initiate individual behavior.

2. Causality of behavior.

If we can think of an act as a manifest consequence, then there must be a prior cause for the action; Of course, after the behavior is generated, this behavior may become the cause of the next behavior.

3. Initiative in behavior.

Individual behavior is not blind, the production of any behavior is by no means accidental, and any behavior is governed by the consciousness of the individual. The actor may not be consciously aware of the reasons for his or her actions, but this in no way proves that he or she is not under the control of Nakano's own consciousness.

4. Persistence of behavior.

Since the behavior is purposeful and occurs on the initiative of the individual, usually, the behavior does not stop until the individual has not achieved his or her goal.

5. Variability of behavior.

Individuals are pursuing their personal goals and the changing circumstances of their environment, choosing the most advantageous way to achieve their personal goals.

The influence of individual behavior on group behavior is reflected in the general characteristics of individual behavior, because individual behavior is the embodiment of group behavior. The details of the impact are as follows:

1. Spontaneity of behavior. Individual behavior occurs automatically with its internal motivation, and external environmental factors can affect the direction and intensity of individual behavior, but cannot initiate individual behavior.

2. Causality of behavior. If an act can be seen as a manifestation of the result, then there must be a prior cause for the act, and of course after the act is generated, the act may become the cause of the next act.

3. Initiative in behavior. Individual behavior is not blind, the generation of any behavior is by no means accidental, any behavior is governed by the consciousness of the individual, the actor may not be consciously aware of the reason for his or her behavior, but this in no way proves that he (she) is not controlled by his or her consciousness.

4. Persistence of behavior. Since the behavior is purposeful and occurs on the individual's own initiative, it usually does not stop until the individual has reached his or her goal.

5. Variability of behavior. Individuals are pursuing their personal goals and the changing circumstances of their environment, choosing the most advantageous way to achieve their personal goals.

Herd behavior refers to the fact that when an individual is influenced by the group (guided or exerted), he will doubt and change his or her opinions, judgments, and behaviors, and change in a direction that is consistent with the majority of the group.

Group pressure refers to the influence of a group on its members. When a group member's thoughts or actions conflict with a group opinion or norm, an invisible psychological pressure felt by the member when he or she needs to conform to the group opinion or norm in order to maintain a relationship with the group, which makes the member inclined to react in a way that is accepted or approved by the group.

The efficiency of an individual's activities is enhanced by the simultaneous participation or presence of others in the event is referred to as social facilitation or social facilitation. There are two cases:One is the improvement of activity efficiency when working together with others, which is called the joint activity effect; The other is the increase in the efficiency of the activity when others are present, which is called the audience effect.

3. Social inhibition

It refers to the phenomenon that when an individual completes a certain activity, the efficiency of behavior is reduced due to the presence of others or activities with others.

Individual behavior is influenced by the group, and is also manifested as social promotion behavior and social inhibition behavior. Social facilitation behavior refers to the phenomenon that in group activities, the efficiency of individual activities is increased due to the influence of other members of the group. In contrast, social inhibition behavior is the opposite of social inhibition, where the efficiency of individual activity is weakened by the influence of other members of the group.

It refers to the phenomenon that many people working together will reduce the motivation of individual activities, that is, when a group completes a task together, the individual puts in less effort than when it is done alone.

The so-called "work without effort" is talking about this phenomenon. Unlike social disruption; Social inertia tends to occur in situations where there is cooperation towards a common goal, but individual achievement cannot be counted alone; Social distraction, on the other hand, focuses on the impact of the presence of others on the individual's behavior, and even when working with others, it is not about doing the same thing, but about the individual doing his or her own work.

Hey. I want to say yes. Individual behavior has an impact on group behavior.

I can give you advice when taking a group. If individual behavior is not united, then it will have an impact on the group, and the result will be failure. But there is one more aspect.

For example, magnified and said. When a person dies. In a small area, it will have an impact on some people, but if it is amplified, it will not have an impact, but it will have a certain impact on their psychology, and they should still eat.

It's time to sleep. You say yes. I don't know, but what I'm saying works for you.

However, ,,, adopt the following. Thank you.

I'll go, you won't be a gold company, right?