-
Efficiency first.
Dealing with the relationship between fairness and efficiency should be efficiency first. Because fairness and efficiency are generally the same, the implementation of the principle of efficiency priority means fairness, and the reasonable so-called principle of efficiency priority means that the distribution system and distribution policy should take the promotion of the development of productive forces and social and economic efficiency as the primary goal, develop the socialist market economy, and deepen the reform of the economic system.
The principle of efficiency priority means that people take economic construction as the center to achieve the development of productive forces as the goal, so that efficiency has improved, production has gone up, social wealth has increased, and people enjoy more social equity, and the development of productive forces is the standard for measuring all social progress, because efficiency belongs to the category of real productive forces, and fairness belongs to the category of production relations and superstructure, so from the general relationship between efficiency and fairness in the sequence of social development factors, efficiency priority is inevitable, A balance between fairness is necessary and therefore reasonable. Among the factors of human social progress, the role of productive forces is huge, the improvement of production efficiency promotes social progress, and with the progress and development of society from low to high, social equity is more and more fully realized. From a macro point of view, the lower the production efficiency, the less adequate the realization of social equity, and the more people lack freedom, democracy and fairness; On the contrary, the higher the production efficiency, the richer the social wealth, the more perfect the human social order built on the basis of the enhancement of social material civilization, the more full the freedom, democracy and fairness that people enjoy, and the more opportunities they can realize and improve themselves.
The more wealth created for society, the greater the efficiency generated, so efficiency should be put first and fairness should be taken into account in the relationship between the two.
-
There will be a disagreement between the grasp of the degree and the understanding of the word, and saying it is the same as not saying it.
-
<> prioritize efficiency and promote equity. Efficiency and fairness are consistent and mutually reinforcing, and fairness is not the same as egalitarianism. Brother Fair has long said fair competition and fair opportunities.
If there is no efficiency, we will not be able to develop in China. Under the current situation, we will not engage in a market economy.
No, so competition is fair competition, and only when a country is competitive can a nation have the right to exist. There is no contradiction between the two points that only when the country develops can the society be fair, and only when there is efficiency can the country develop. The relationship between efficiency and fairness should be analyzed under specific conditions, and it is not advisable to talk about who is worse than the one who comes first.
-
Efficiency and fairness are aligned. On the one hand, efficiency is a material prerequisite for fairness. The gradual realization of social equity is possible only on the basis of developing productive forces, improving economic efficiency, and increasing social wealth.
Equity, without efficiency as a premise and foundation, can only lead to egalitarianism and widespread poverty. On the other hand, fairness is a guarantee of improving economic efficiency. Only by safeguarding the rights of workers for fair distribution and ensuring their interests can we arouse their enthusiasm for developing production and improving economic efficiency.