How to look at capitalism Dying but not dying The answer is probably about one hundred to two hundre

Historically, the capitalist state system has experienced two major crises and is now entering a third crisis.

One occurred in the middle of the 19th century, between the first industrial revolution and the second industrial revolution. The other occurred at the beginning of the 20th century, between the Second Industrial Revolution and the Third Industrial Revolution.

We are now living in an era in which the capitalist state system is facing a third crisis.

The productive forces of humanity are constantly increasing, and the relations of production must find suitable uses for these productive forces, so that they can circulate and expand, otherwise they will be transformed into destructive forces. When productivity is transformed into destructive force, there will also be a chain reaction that destroys the relations of production and causes a decrease in productivity.

The second and third industrial revolutions adjusted the relations of production, and the increasing productive forces could destroy or improve the outside and improve the inside, but would not be transformed into internal destructive forces. Between the Industrial Revolutions, there was a surplus of productive forces, and part of the productive forces would become an internal destructive force.

This is the reason why the capitalist state system has historically "dyed but not died": the productive forces are also destructive, and certain conditions are required for the transformation of the productive forces into destructive forces. The Industrial Revolution prevented productivity from turning into a destructive force.

Dialectical describes a comprehensive vision of the problem. It refers to the correct reflection of people's dialectical development process of objective things through concepts, judgments, reasoning and other forms of thinking, that is, the reflection of objective dialectics. The most basic characteristic of dialectical thinking is to examine the object as a whole, from its internal contradictory movements, changes, and interconnections in various aspects, in order to understand the object systematically and completely in essence.

The changes that have taken place in contemporary capitalism are fundamentally the result of the effects of the general laws of the development of human society and the laws of the capitalist economy, and do not mean that the fundamental nature of capitalist relations of production has changed. Although the new changes in contemporary capitalism are profound and their significance is far-reaching, they have not touched the foundations of capitalist domination or changed the nature of the capitalist system.

Fifth, changes in the political system.

The historical trend of the so-called inevitable demise of capitalism does not mean that capitalism has come to an end and is about to perish. So this statement is wrong.

After World War II, the capitalist system did not undergo fundamental changes, and the capitalist countries strengthened their macroeconomic management through their own continuous reform and adjustment, implemented the nationalization policy to varying degrees, and strengthened and perfected state monopoly capitalism. Capitalism is not "dying but not dying" or "rotting but not immortal", but is still constantly improving and developing itself. Things are constantly changing and developing, and the essence of development is the emergence of new things and the death of old things, which requires us to look at problems from the perspective of development and be clear about the development stage of things.

Development is the unity of tortuous nature and forward nature. We should persist in proceeding from reality in everything we do, and persist in combining the two-point theory with the key theory.

The scientific and technological revolution, self-regulation, and economic globalization are like three pennies, temporarily pushing the capitalist ferry out of the whirlpool. Marx once pointed out: "No form of society will perish until all the productive forces which it can contain have been brought into play."

Therefore, it is unrealistic to understand the historical trend of the inevitable demise of capitalism as "soon to perish". The process of releasing the energy of a social and economic system to accommodate and develop the productive forces often needs to go through a long historical period. However, the "relative prosperity" of capitalism has not brought about a qualitative change in contemporary capitalism, and the basic contradiction between the relations of production and the productive forces based on private ownership of the means of production still exists.

Although the self-adjustment of the Western capitalist countries within the scope of their basic system can alleviate certain contradictions, it cannot change the fate of the inevitable demise of the capitalist system after all.

Capitalism represents the most advanced science and technology and scientific ideas of mankind, but the Soviet Union is really dead. Is what is imported from the capitalist countries rotten? Why didn't the customs block back?

I think that now our system is truly dying but not dying, rotting but not immortal...

After many events and major crises, the capitalist system has matured day by day, and it is basically at the advanced stage of capitalism.

The United States dominates the capitalist world.

In the forties and fifties, the capitalist countries began to engage in state intervention in the economy, state capitalism. It is manifested in the nationalization of industry (to a certain extent inferior to that of the socialist countries), the increase in state fiscal expenditures, the social welfare system, and the implementation of economic planning.

It has entered the first period of capitalist development.

In the 50s and 80s, capitalism entered an era of stagflation. Countries have reduced their intervention in the economy.

From the nineties to the present, it is the era of what they call the knowledge economy. Marxism is used, but it is not allowed to dominate.

The real "dying without dying, rotting without restlessness" is socialism.

Let's start with the productive forces: I personally believe that the period of great development of capitalism was after World War II, and the wealth created by capitalist countries in the 50 years after World War II has exceeded the sum of the past 500 years. May I ask where it comes to dying?

From the point of view of production relations: all the rules of the game in the world today are in the service of capitalism, and every country is advocating marketization and freedom**. The planned economic system, represented by the Soviet Union, was more like a large-scale economic experiment.

Neither in terms of the productive forces nor in terms of the relations of production, it is not clear that capitalism has reached the point where it is "dying but not dying, and rotting without resting". As for the current financial crisis, it is less devastating than the Great Depression. The European debt crisis was entirely self-inflicted by the Europeans.

In fact, after the Second World War, all capitalist countries were gradually transforming into socialist national trade unions, and the Labour Party occupied a pivotal position in the country.

The big capitalists also had to compromise with the working class.

The working class in the capitalist powers has also slowly transformed into the middle class, and the oppression of labor power has gradually shifted to the third world countries.

Capitalism weakened after World War II.

1.。In addition, Roosevelt's bold comprehensive state intervention in the economy before World War II eased the capitalist "contradiction between the private ownership of the means of production and the socialization of production".

After the war, it was widely used by capitalist countries to further consolidate the capitalist system.

2.。Historically, capitalism is still on the rise, 3. In World War II, some of the best research projects were developed after the war, and it seems that people can make a name for themselves when they fight.

4.。Personally, I feel that the "penalty" is because the gap between the rich and the poor is widening, and the better the development of capitalism, the greater the gap between the rich and the poor.

Moreover, the capitalists are, after all, the minority and the workers are the majority, and when capitalism develops to the point where "fully automated production" requires little or no workers, it means.

1) A large number of workers are unemployed.

2) Fiscal spending on unemployment insurance has increased dramatically.

Implicit is a certain crisis, but "full automatic" is too far away, so capitalism has not yet developed to the point of extinction.

The flower that expresses love, I want to give you, the blue lotus, because she is my star guardian flower, his representative is sincere apologies, I want to give you the sunflower, it represents the silent love like you quietly guard me, I want to give you the little daisy, because it represents innocence and innocence, very cute, I want you to be as happy as him.

The letter was formatted incorrectly, and there were two blank spaces after my dear parents.