Some people say that medical care in the United States is free, and some people say that the United

I think it's true that medical care is free in the United States, because the United States is a developed country, the economy is very good, and their social welfare is also very high, and the cost of medical care is not very large.

Some people say that medical care in the United States is free, and some people say that it costs thousands of dollars to treat colds in the United States, in fact, these two statements are true, but the ** process in the United States is very troublesome, you have to apply in advance, and then wait for a series of things to be approved.

I think it's true that medical care is free in the United States. Because the United States is an economic power after all, it is not impossible to provide free medical care.

It is true that it costs thousands of dollars to treat a cold in the United States, and you have to pay for an ambulance in the United States, and it is very expensive to see a doctor.

Some people say that medical care in the United States is free, and some people say that it costs thousands of dollars to treat a cold in the United States, and the former is true, but if you go to a hospital in the United States, you need to make an appointment in advance, and you can't go when you want to.

Both statements are correct, because public health care in the United States is free, but the efficiency is relatively low, while the choice of private hospitals, the efficiency is relatively high, the cost is relatively high, and the level is also very advanced.

This is similar to China's medical insurance; Some people can't be reimbursed if they don't have medical insurance, and some people can be reimbursed if they do.

I think it's all true, different people can definitely enjoy different treatment, and this is the reality of society.

As we all know, the United States is a developed country, the economy ranks first in the world, many people think that American residents are very rich, in fact, this is not the case, the gap between the rich and the poor in the United States is very large, and the medical security system in developed countries is also very different. Compared with some developed countries, the medical security system of the United States is acceptable, but compared with the developed countries in Europe in the same period, the medical policy of the United States is not free.

For those well-insured American elites, medical care is almost free, almost enjoying the best quality service, the world's top technology, but for some people who do not have medical insurance, they can only enjoy the most basic medical protection, because the medical costs in the United States are really sky-high.

Friends who have studied in the United States may know that they will generally pay medical insurance premiums ranging from a few hundred dollars when they enter school, which hurts to look at, but when it is really time to use it, you will know how wise it is. An international student had a stomachache at night, called an ambulance, sent to the emergency department, and then the problem was not big, he took a break and went back, and soon received a bill of thousands of dollars, and the ambulance was hundreds of dollars, is there a heartache, in the United States, doctors are a very good job, in addition to saving lives and helping the wounded, the social status and economic income of doctors are completely in the middle and upper class.

Most people in the United States who have a stable income**, in addition to medical insurance, usually buy additional commercial insurance, try to be responsible for various medical expenses, an American uncle because of the expiration of medical insurance, need surgery, the hospital issued more than 100,000 dollars, the uncle went directly to India for surgery spent 30,000 dollars. As we all know, labor costs are very expensive in the United States, and doctors in the United States are more expensive, and in China they may feel that civil servants, public institutions, and state-owned enterprises are good, and in the United States, doctors, lawyers, and financial personnel are absolutely gold-collar, and Chinese public hospitals are the first choice for residents, but foreign countries are more private medical or clinics.

Although the United States is free of charge, the wool comes from the sheep, and Americans have to pay a lot of taxes and fees every day, and they also have to bear various taxes, so it is not actually free.

The United States is not free medical care, only those who have health insurance can reimburse most of the costs, and those who do not have health insurance can only enjoy basic medical protection, and the rest** is very expensive.

No, it's similar to China's medical insurance, but in a different form, directly reducing part of the medical expenses is not free medical care.

Low-income people in the United States receive free medical care, and those who earn more than a certain level are covered by health insurance.

The cost of seeing a doctor in the United States is very high, and many of them are private clinics, and it takes a long time to queue**, unlike Chinese hospitals, which are more convenient and popular. Although seeing a doctor in the United States is troublesome and complicated. But most people can still afford to get sick, and the economic level of the United States is relatively developed, and in general, the life of each family is not too difficult and difficult.

Of course, there are also a small number of families who are too poor to see a doctor.

Americans can afford to see a doctor, although the cost of seeing a doctor is very high, but the ** department will subsidize it.

Not free. Visiting a doctor is almost free or very small. The Children's Health Insurance program is designed to protect the health of children from low- and middle-income families. Most of the general population, who do not belong to these three groups, rely on commercial medical insurance.

Types of Medicare in the United States:

1. Medical insurance for commercial slag reform.

Most of the commercial medical insurance is purchased by the employing company for the employees, and the more powerful companies will bear 70% of the insurance costs for the employees in the form of annual fees, and the remaining 30% will be paid by the employees themselves, and when the sick and hospitalized pay for the nuclear auspicious quietly, the individual only needs to pay 10% of the medical expenses.

2. Red, white and blue card program for the elderly and the disabled.

Disabled people over the age of 65 or under the age of 65, and all groups suffering from permanent kidney failure and ALS, will be led by the federal ** to initiate the Medicare free medical care program.

For a small fee, participants in the program can receive access to any authorized hospital and clinic across the United States**. And because the project card is blue and red, it is quite distinctive, and this free medical banquet project is also known as the red and blue card project. <>

We need to look at this problem in two ways, because the reimbursement of the medical system in any country is more complex, and the proportion of reimbursement will be different for different groups of people.

Therefore, we can't say that medical care in the United States is completely free, and we can't say that the best medical treatment in the United States will be sky-high, because there is no absolute in everything.

We all know that the United States is a developed country and there is a huge gap between the rich and the poor, and medical care, as a necessary daily need of the people, has naturally been included in its governing framework.

In the United States, if you are a group of people who live on state benefits, the state does favor this part of the population in terms of medical security, so people who are living in difficulty can get free medical treatment.

Because we will find a problem from American movies, that is, often one American hero can save the whole world, and this plot is also reflected in the care of the disadvantaged.

But as the middle-class and above people in the United States, it is clear that they are not included, and they not only need to pay and buy insurance, but also the cost of medical treatment is also a large expense.

Some people say that if you don't have commercial insurance and medical insurance, will you really go bankrupt in a minute when you see a doctor in the United States, and I have worked hard to sort out the information for this question.

In the U.S., it's common to see a doctor first and pay later, so if you encounter a low-quality person, even a poor hospital has to serve the patient, because the hospital will think about it from a humanitarian perspective.

If the patient is seriously ill and has no money and needs to be hospitalized, but there is no insurance, the patient's hospitalization expenses are generally borne by **, hospitals and other public welfare organizations.

This situation directly drives up the cost of hospitals in the United States, and hospitals have to increase emergency expenses in order to maintain their normal operations, which is also one of the reasons for the high cost of emergency services in the United States.

Similarly, the U.S. health care system is very complex, and there are many types of commercial insurance, to put it bluntly, the higher the amount of insurance you buy. The better the medical care you receive.

Jobs in the U.S. usually cover some or all of the premiums, and many large and good companies will purchase full health insurance for their employees as part of their benefits.

In other words, in capitalist countries, "money" is the key to solving medical problems, and usually the poor need to pay the least to see a doctor, and often the middle class in the United States is the most stressed.

It's all true, but the premise of free medical care is that you must pay full medical insurance every month, and it is also true that it costs thousands of dollars to treat a cold, and the medical expenses in the United States are very high.

Some people say that medical care in the United States is free, and some people say that it costs thousands of dollars to treat a cold in the United States. Both of these statements are actually true, but because the free ** procedure is very complicated, people can only spend their own money and then hire a private doctor to carry out **, which is relatively expensive.

Medical care in the United States is free, but the way of treating diseases in the United States is different from that in China. For example, if you have a cold in the United States, they advise you to be naturally fine, and if you go to the hospital**, shoot**, these need to be issued. Advance reservations are also required.

Personally, I think that medical care in the United States is impossible to be free, maybe it is only lower than the ** in our country, and the United States costs thousands of dollars to treat colds, so I personally feel that these two are not true, since medical treatment is free, why can this cold cost thousands of yuan, it is very contradictory.

Both of these are true. Free medical care in the U.S. refers only to those who have a U.S. green card, and without a U.S. green card, a cold can cost thousands of dollars.

The latter is true and the former is false.

The United States is a typical low-welfare state, the market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources, ** in addition to economic macro-control, there is not much intervention in the market, which is completely different from Europe's big ** high welfare.

Unlike European welfare, which only subsidizes the poorest and is the lowest subsistence guarantee, the United States has always been at the bottom of the West, even worse than Japan and South Korea. To say that the United States is free medical care is a big joke.

Before Obamacare, there were 40 million people in the United States who did not have health insurance, and the popular commercial insurance in the United States was completely hosted by private individuals, that is, how much service was enjoyed by how much money was paid.

As a result, it is often the rich who have the best medical care, followed by the middle class, and the poor who get sick either to die or go into debt to see a doctor. After Obama took office, he forced all Americans to buy Obamacare, and the poor could not afford to provide them with insurance, and the cost was actually shared between the middle class and the rich, so many middle-class and rich people in the United States were very dissatisfied, thinking that Obama was generous to others, rewarding laziness, and forcing them to pay for the poor.

Because of this grievance, Trump decided to repeal Obamacare in order to win the support of the middle class and the wealthy. In short, the cost-effectiveness and penetration rate of medical services in the United States are not only far lower than those of high-welfare countries like Europe, but also far inferior to those of China, which can be said to be the worst and most unequal situation in terms of medical welfare.

Of course, the so-called highly market-oriented medical services in the United States are not completely without advantages, because they are completely determined by the market, so pharmaceutical companies often get huge profits, so the motivation for work research and development is very strong, which greatly promotes medical technology innovation, so that 80% of the world's medical innovation comes from the United States, and the medical system in the United States is a typical sacrifice of fairness for efficiency.

In the United States, there is no medical insurance reimbursement for colds. So the American ** cold costs a lot of money. And if you have commercial health insurance in the United States, you don't have to spend money.