sin root number x 1 sin root number x limit, when X approaches infinity

Updated on educate 2024-08-13
12 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-16

    x approaches infinityThe limit of the sin root number (x+1) - the sin root number x is 0. First, the product of each difference is directly used using the Lagrangian median value theorem.

    The definition of infinity, it is obvious that the cos term is bounded and the sin term tends to zero, so the limit of the whole is zero.

    Math:

    Mathematics is the study of concepts such as quantity, structure, change, space, and information. Mathematics is a general means for humans to strictly describe the abstract structure and pattern of things, and can be applied to any problem in the real world, and all mathematical objects are inherently artificially defined. In this sense, mathematics belongs to the formal sciences.

    And not natural science. Different mathematicians and philosophers have a range of opinions on the exact scope and definition of mathematics.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    First, the product of each difference.

    sqrt stands for root number.

    sin(sqrt(x+1)-sin(sqrt(x))=cos((sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x))/2)sin((sqrt(x+1)-sqrt(x))/2)

    cos((sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x))/2)sin((1/(2sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x)))

    x->inf

    Meaning infinity.

    Apparently. The cos item is bounded.

    The sin item tends to zero, so the limit of the whole is zero, and the writing is very messy, forgive me.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    Directly use the Lagrangian median value theorem.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    First, the product of each difference.

    sqrt stands for root number.

    sin(sqrt(x+1)-sin(sqrt(x))=cos((sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x))/2)sin((sqrt(x+1)-sqrt(x))/2)

    cos((sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x))/2)sin((1/(2sqrt(x+1)+sqrt(x)))

    x->inf

    Meaning infinity.

    Apparently. The cos item is bounded.

    The sin item tends to zero, so the overall limit section is zero, and the written grip is very messy, and if you see the collapse, forgive me.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The details are as follows:

    lim , both converge, then the sequence also converges, and its limit is equal to the sum of the limit of and the limit of .

    The relation to a subcolumn, where the sequence converges or diverges from any of its trivial subcolumns, and has the same limit at convergence; The sufficient and necessary condition for the convergence of the sequence is that any nontrivial sub-column of the sequence converges.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    lim{x->∞sin√(x+1)-sin√x=lim{x->∞2cos(√(x+1)+√x)/2*sin(√(x+1)-√x)/2=lim{x->∞2cos(√(x+1)+√x)/2*sin[1/2(√(x+1)+√x)]=0

    "Limit" is a branch of calculus in mathematics.

    The basic concept of "limit" in the broad sense means "infinitely close and never reachable".

    The "limit" in mathematics refers to the process of a variable in a certain function, which gradually approaches a certain definite value a and "can never coincide to a" in the process of eternal change of a function that is getting bigger (or smaller) forever, and the change of this variable is artificially defined as "always approaching without stopping", and it has a "tendency to constantly get extremely close to point a".

    Limit is a description of a "state of change". The value a that this variable is always approaching is called the "limit value" (which can also be represented by other symbols).

    Generation: Like all scientific methods of thought, limit thinking is also a social practice.

    The brain is a product of abstract thinking. The idea of limits can be traced back to ancient times, for example, the circumcision of the motherland Liu Hui.

    It is the application of a primitive and reliable "constantly approaching" limit idea based on the study of intuitive graphics.

    The ancient Greeks' method of exhaustion also contained the idea of limits, but because of the Greeks' "fear of the 'infinite'", they avoided the obvious artificial "limits" and resorted to indirect proofs, the method of reduction.

    to complete the relevant proof.

    In the 16th century, the Dutch mathematician Stevenn was examining the center of gravity of a triangle.

    In the process, he improved the exhaustion method of the ancient Greeks, who boldly used the idea of limit to think about problems with the help of geometric intuition, and abandoned the proof of the method of attribution. In this way, he inadvertently "pointed out the direction of developing the limit method into a practical concept".

    The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Limit.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Use the Lagrangian median theorem to find it.

    f(x) =sinx

    <> is infinitesimal. <> is infinitesimal.

    is a bounded variable (|cosx|<=1)

    A bounded variable multiplied by an infinitesimal is infinitesimal.

    So the limit is 0

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Suffice it to say that sinx can approach different numbers as x tends to infinity. For example, when x=n, sinx 0, so tends to 0, and when x=2n +(1 2), sinx 1. So it tends to be 1.

    When x approaches infinity, it may make Xunshi x=2k + 2, and when k takes infinity, x is also infinite. At this point, f(x)=1.

    When x approaches infinity, it may be such that x=2k, and when k takes infinity, x is also infinite. At this point, f(x)=0.

    According to the uniqueness of the limit, the above situation is obviously not unique, so the limit does not exist.

    If x approaches positive infinity, the number x also approaches positive infinity.

    From sinx, when x tends to infinity, sinx is infinite, and there is no limit value.

    When the root number x tends to infinity, the sin root number x is infinite, and there is no limit value.

    Correspondence of n.

    Generally speaking, n becomes larger as it gets smaller, so n is often written as n( ) to emphasize the change of n pairs. But this does not mean that n is uniquely determined: (e.g., if n> n makes |xn-a|< is true, then obviously n>n+1, n>2n, etc., also make |xn-a|< founded).

    What matters is the existence of n, not the magnitude of its value.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    sin root number (x+1) - sin root number (x-1) = 2

    sin[(root(x+1)-root(x-1)) 2]cos[(root(x+1)+root(x-1)) 2] Then Siling uses the principle of entrapment 0<=|sin root number (x+1) - sin root number (x-1)|=2

    sin[(root(x+1)-root(x-1)) 2]cos[(root(x+1)+root(x-1)) 2]|=2|sin[(root(x+1)-root(x-1)) 2]|*cos[(x+1) + x-1) 2]|<2|sin[(root(x+1)-root(x-1)) 2]|Then find the limit of sin[(root number(x+1)-root number(x-1)) 2] to rationalize the molecule.

    Root number (x+1) - root number (x-1) = [root number (x+1) - root number (x-1)] [root number (x+1) + root number (x-1)] root number (x+1) + root number (x-1)] = x+1) - (x-1)] root number (x+1) + root number (x-1)].

    Square Difference Formula.

    2 [root(x+1)+root(x-1)]sin[(root(x+1)-root(x-1)) 2]=sin[1 (sin[(root(x+1)+root(x-1)) 2])]0 Because the root(x+1), root(x-1)-> infinity, the numerator is o(1), so there must be a limit of 0 by the entrapment theorem

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    lim(x->+1+x)- x]=lim(x->+1+x-x) (1+x)+ x)] physicochemical molecule).

    lim(x->+1/(√1+x)+√x)]

    lim(x->+sin(( 1+x)- x) 2) congratulatory return = 0

    Cos( 1+x)+x) 2) 1

    and sin( (1+x))-sin( x) =2*cos(( 1+x)+ x) 2)*sin(( 1+x)- x) 2) application and difference product formula).

    2│sin((√1+x)-√x)/2)│

    -2 sin( 1+x)- x) 2) sin( (1+x))-sin( x) 2 sin( 1+x)- x) 2).

    0≤lim(x->+sin(√(1+x))-sin(√x)]≤0

    Therefore lim(x->+sin( (1+x))-sin( x)]=0

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    lim{x-> sin (x+1)-sin boxi:x=lim{x-> 2cos( (x+1)+ x) 2*sin( (x+1)- x) 2

    lim{x->∞2cos(√(x+1)+√x)/2*sin[1/2(√(x+1)+√x)]

    The second equal sign is ( ( x+1)- x)2 for molecular pants is rationalized.

    That is, the numerator and denominator.

    Multiply by (x+1)+ x at the same time

    The third equal basis is pure because of the bounded function and infinitesimal ones.

    is still infinitesimal in product.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    sin root number (x+1) - sin root number (x-1)2 sin [(root number (x+1) - root number (x-1)) 2]cos[(root number (x+1) + root number (x-1)) 2].

    Then the principle of pinch is used.

    0 infinity, the numerator is o(1).

    So Danchun thinks that there must be a limit to the coercing theorem of the pinching chain, which is 0

Related questions
13 answers2024-08-13

Your teacher's unraveling method is right.

Because it's an equation, the left and right sides are equal, but in different forms, for example, if the numbers on both sides of the 2=2 equal sign are obviously equal, and square them to 4=4, isn't it the same? >>>More

7 answers2024-08-13

1 ream (1 x) u, get: x u 2 1, dx 2udu.

Original u 2 1) u (2u)du >>>More

16 answers2024-08-13

I don't know that people born in 97 have already done this kind of question, dare to ask if the world can still be saved? Hehe. >>>More

12 answers2024-08-13

x should have a range, right? y=f(x)=(1+cos2x+8sin 2x) sin2x =(1+cos2x+4-4cos2x) sin2x =(5-3cos2x) sin2x =(5-3cos2x) [1-(cos2x) 2] and then solve according to the range Follow-up: When 0 is basically the same as the following.

8 answers2024-08-13

(1/2)[arcsinx + x√(1 - x²)]c

The process of solving the problem is as follows: >>>More