Which is better, Merida Navigator 500 or Delmante 2 0? All of them are 13 models. 10

Personally, I am very supportive of the UCC delmante, the whole wheel set is better than the navigator, and then there is **, the delmante is more expensive than the collar 500, but look at the configuration.

UCC delmante configuration.

Frame: UCC hydroformed DB tube aluminum alloy frame.

Brake system: SHIMANO

395 hydraulic disc brakes.

Fork: SR

suntour xcm-d

HLO Variable Speed Cassette:

shimano acera

11-32t

Crank: Shimano Acera

42 32 22t Size:

Shifting: Shimano Acera

3*9s Color:

White-red, black-white-blue, dark gray, light gray.

Color]: Red, Black, White, Yellow [Size]: 26 x 16 18 [Frame]: Merida TFS faux hydroformed with frog legs.

Fork]: Santor SR-XCM HLO-D-100mm [Brakes]: Yanhao Tektro HDC300 oil disc [handlebar cross]:

Merida 2168 aluminum alloy swallow handle, rise 15° [stem]: Merida black + silver stem lid [bowl set]: FSA

Cassette: Shimano M361 44 32 22T [Crank]: SRSLNTOLR XCR V3 [Shift Front Dial]:

Shimano M390 [Variable Speed Rear Shifter]: Shimano M390 9-speed [Variable Speed Shifter]: Shimano M390 split shifter.

Why didn't you ride it, I chose the Pilot 500

I really didn't know about the Navigator 500, I knew there was a Dragon 500The Navigator 530 is not as cost-effective as the Delmante. Deman is only 1998 yuan, and the configuration is basically the same.

The cost performance of the Longxing 500 is similar to that of Delmante. In fact, it is such a car set up to combat the cost performance of the Demante series.

Longxing is the closest to Demante, and the cost performance is similar. But the shock and crank are slightly worse. The Delmant is a little more balanced, and the frame is about the same, and if I'm not mistaken, the frames of both brands are made by the same factory.

Anyway, I know that Merida's premium frame is produced by UCC. There is also the fact that the saddle of the Demante is very high-end. It also looks a lot prettier.

The pedals of the Demante are also made of aluminum alloy, but this looks great, and in fact the nylon pedals have fewer failures.

Personally, I prefer UCC's car, and it is more practical from the first time it is listed, and this attitude is worth affirming. Don't you notice that in recent years, Merida and Giant have improved their cost performance? It's because the UCC configuration is too realistic.

If you don't improve, you will be slowly knocked down by the UCC. Overall. UCC's overall value for money is still the best.

Personally, I prefer the UCC series of cars, UCC Demante and Apache TEAM above, Webster series are all hydraulic brakes, and the style of UCC cars is also more beautiful.

The UCC is a little more balanced. Cost performance is, balance is king.

It mainly depends on the speed shifting, brakes, fork of his car, what grade, and whether his transmission is mixed and matched, and other places do not have much impact on performance. Some cars change part of the transmission to a cheap one, and when you buy a car, you can see if the transmission is a complete set. Or the overall configuration of the Demante is better, I haven't ridden these two cars, I don't know how comfortable it is.

LZ, are you still satisfied? Adopt mine.

Anyway, don't buy anything Xidesheng, this car is too Nima fucked.

In fact, I suggest you take a look at the ATX777 of the Giant 13 model, a 27-speed oil disc! Very good value for money! If you really want to choose between the two, choose the Duke 600!

Personally, I feel that the practicality is a little greater! In fact, in terms of maintenance, if the wire disc feels bad, or there is a small problem, you can go to the store you bought, or any Merida store, they should help you debug it for free. But if something goes wrong with the oil disc, let alone a low-end oil disc!

That's hard to say! The watchtower lord adopts!

At this price of hydraulic disc brakes, the landlord should not have any illusions. Really not as good as bb5, bb7. According to your road conditions, the form on the road, bald tires are not a big problem, but the car is a car at this price, with bald tires, you can't be much faster, not as good as the Duke 600 tires road conditions are a little more versatile.

If you just choose between these two, I recommend the Duke 600.

In fact, there is not much difference, or the Navigator 500 should be more suitable for you, the oil disc brakes quickly, and there is no maintenance; Smooth tires are suitable for flat roads.

The navigator is Taiwan Yanhao's braking system Personally, I feel that the performance is really not as good as BB5 The tires don't matter if they are tangled All the changes are less than 100 yuan In fact, either they are challengers or honest dukes I really don't have much interest in the navigator The above only represents personal opinions.

16 inches, I guess you're still old, don't blow him, have you tried? I 181 Duke 600 13 also 17 inches. Do you want to go against the sky?

Not bad....The challenger doesn't necessarily have to be. The same company is rising, and the price is naturally high. At the same price, there is always a grand and mediocre point....The challenger is just conducive to changing the skin and upgrading the old clothes....There is also a pick 35 on top of the three.

Recommended UCC, Demant, 24-speed, front and rear oil discs, fork hydraulic suspension, Italian brand cushions, cost-effective, and the same Taiwanese brand, the forum has seen a lot of Merida broken fork posts, but there is no UCC, if you exclude the factors of mutual denigration by peers, from one side it shows that the quality of UCC is relatively good, and the configuration is higher than Merida.

Merida is a brand of one grade and one level with Giant and HASA, which is the so-called three major brands in Taiwan. UCC is a domestic brand known as an American brand, and Xidesheng, Fujitec, Format, Chichi and so on. The two are not at the same level.

Therefore, the UCC at the same price is slightly higher than the Merida configuration. In between, Merida is recommended in terms of branding, and UCC is recommended in terms of **. As for which one is good, those who sell Merida will say that Merida is good, and those who sell UCC will say that UCC is good.

However, the two models you mentioned are not comparable. It is recommended to go to see Giant and HASA again.

Recommend UCC's German 3, the materials are more realistic, cost-effective and balanced are better than Merida, Merida 2014 car, very tricky people to reduce the configuration, the name remains the same, there is a suspicion of fooling car friends. Merida is becoming more and more unrealistic now.

The 2014 Demant inherits the consistently excellent quality of UCC sports bikes In the case of **unchanged There is a new large kit upgraded from the original 430 kit to the M4000 The front fork has Santo replaced with a more comfortable American Speed Link XC28 front fork The overall paint is matte More atmospheric It is a superior mountain bike Look at what you will like As for Merida After being famous in the past few years, things are a little unreal Compare and test ride You will have your opinion Personal opinion FYI Thank you.

Personally, I recommend choosing a mountain bike from the Merida series.

The Navigator 500 is several hundred more expensive than the Duke 500, the Navigator 500 is of the same level as the Duke 700, the Navigator 300 is the same level as the Duke 500, the car of the Navigator 300 is a bald tire, the riding road is better, and the resistance is less, the Duke 500 is a tooth tire, and the grip on the road is good, and the resistance on the horse is greater than that of the Bald Tire of the Navigator 300.

If you are riding a road, choose the navigator 300, and if you ride a bad road, choose the Duke 500, and the configuration is almost the same, because**It's the same.

The 13 models of the Navigator 500 are now discontinued, and it is estimated that they will not be able to buy them.