Why do celebrities earn more than researchers?

This problem sometimes affects the choice of future majors for some young people, but more young people will wake up to one point, that is, the so-called stars standing at the top may only be a few, and the flowering period may not be long. What researchers are pursuing is another kind of continuous realm. If you use money to measure the income of celebrities and scientific researchers, it seems that it is undoubtedly to make the public feel that celebrities are more profitable, and this profession will make money faster.

Especially when the industry exposed rumors that some top stars earned 2.08 million a day, the income of any scientific researcher could not be compared.

Money seems to be a good thing, and from a practical point of view, it seems that anything can be bought, and if it can't be bought, then no one else can do it alone or cross the laws of nature.

obtained. <>

Researchers are always on the road to new knowledge, and the reward they will get for cheering at completing a difficult project may be a fraction of what the top stars see as a fraction of what makes it comparable. Big stars and billionaires with countless fortunes may not be happy in their hearts. But poverty seems to be more troublesome than the general population.

People always seem to be chasing some realms that they can't reach, but for scientific researchers, within a certain range, they may be able to jump out of the two things of money and poverty and do what they are obsessed with. This state of spiritual abundance is actually more satisfying than having money.

Of course, all of this is only ideal, and the competition between researchers can be so cruel that it is unimaginable, and the best people may not always get the best opportunity to work on new projects.

Celebrities can also achieve spiritual prosperity when they are doing their favorite careers, and they can also have wealth, while scientific researchers may be exhausted after completing the entire project in advance, and even have a kind of despair that wants to retreat, of course, all this may be reversed. If you compare it from the money alone, some things will lose their original taste. Under the premise that the salary is not high, scientific researchers will also encounter various hardships and even unfair treatment, and they will also feel hopeless after struggling for this.

How much struggle or how much price did a star go through to climb to the current top position, and the hardships he has endured may only be understood by himself.

Outsiders may just see the results directly, ignoring that many things are not simple in themselves, or how many hurdles they have to go through before they become what they are now.

And the world's eyes may not be worth it by the amount of money alone.

Because the income of celebrities is very high, because celebrities work very hard, and they work day and night, it is normal to have a high salary, after all, celebrities are very beautiful.

Because there are many celebrities who are very popular now, and some of the more well-known stars are also paid very well, they will have a high income.

Because the star itself has many advantages, and the amount of ** is also very high, which can bring high commercial value, the income is particularly high.

Because there are many celebrities whose salaries are very high, and there are also some bad practices in the entertainment industry, this phenomenon has occurred.

It's all my foolishness, and if I'm serious, I'll lose.

In fact, the income of scientists nowadays is quite high. At the top are well-known scientists, with funding and projects, as well as their own companies, and their income is sufficient.

The second is that the public sector is not so well-known, but it is well-known in the industry, but there are ** topics in hand, or there is a small company, or a consultant, consultant, and chief scientist in the enterprise.

Again, the reputation is not too loud, but it has strength, low-key, problems, and **.

In the end, there is no subject, no **, or on the way to apply, you can only get a salary.

A star, with a salary of more than 100 million yuan and an average of several million per day, has become a hot topic of discussion. How much money should a celebrity make? I don't know, and I'm not qualified to say.

But I know that how much he earns, there are also people who are willing to give him so much, not forced, this is no problem. But is it reasonable to voluntarily pay highly? It's not something I can discuss, and I don't want to discuss, but I recognize the value of celebrities.

What I want to discuss is why do celebrities make so much? Why can't ordinary tech workers? What's the difference?

Of course, there is nothing profound, it's all clichés.

What is the difference between how celebrities and tech workers make money? Celebrities earn money from traffic, and like Internet celebrities and the Internet, traffic is an amplifier of star value, and some people are willing to pay for celebrities, they are paying for traffic. Science and technology workers, who are naturally weak in terms of traffic, make money that is part of the value of science, technology and products.

Why do celebrities earn more and fewer tech workers? I think it's a matter of distribution, and the strongest distribution power is capital. I don't know what the traffic ranks, but most of the time it's ahead of the intellectual property, and it's just an observation.

Therefore, the science and technology work to earn less, in fact, their results account for too little in the final profit distribution, or more generally, the ownership of the results is not clear, or there is no intellectual property rights, and naturally there is no distribution.

In the end, I recognize the value of the star, but I will not object to the state restriction because he has other considerations. But the point is that I support increasing the proportion of intellectual property distribution, encouraging the whole village to invent and innovate, and finally don't forget to make intellectual property rights, and then ** low (this is contradictory, purely out of my selfishness), so that I can also enjoy the convenience it brings.

On a whim for a few days, I analyzed (said it was an analysis, in fact, it was a simple enumeration, but I saw the problem, this? I'm also speechless, I can't think of it, I can't think of it) a patent for a small hot product, it turned out that the front person applied for a patent early, and gave up early (may not want to pay the annual fee), and the people behind sent a bunch around the appearance, but no one found that the core utility model is not patented, this patent was not occupied until the beginning of this year, does this mean that I can really pick up money from the patent? I know that most of the time the conclusion is:

Think beautifully. It's interesting, though.

First of all, the market determines the income, the number of scientists is not as much as the number of stars, proportionally speaking, the income of scientists is not as high as that of stars, and secondly, the money of scientists is given by the state, there is a certain standard, if there is an invention and creation, then he will have patent fees, and if someone uses his things, he will have money, after all, such scientists are in the minority. And celebrities are a market economy, they rely on the market to eat, the more fans like them, or the more powerful the packaging team, the higher their income!

First of all, there are a large number of celebrities through the media, advertising, movies and TV series, and news, and there are fewer channels for scientists, and there are many celebrities in interactivity, including fan meetings, press conferences, press conferences, and so on.

The second and more critical thing is that celebrities belong to the category of entertainment, most of the people rely on entertainment to relieve the release pressure, and 80% of the grassroots at the bottom are not highly educated compared to these people. For people at the bottom, let them understand the pursuit of scientists, how to pursue them? Do you understand their academics or listen to their speeches?

There is no intellectual resonance, so celebrities are more popular than scientists, and coupled with the operation of the market economy, celebrities earn more than scientists.

There is only one country for scientists, celebrities are coaxed by people all over the world, people like to be happy, entertaining, and watch anything beautiful, are people comfortable with scientists every day? It's still interesting to listen to songs and watch the plot of the show against beautiful stars.

This is just a relative statement. If all the things that scientists invent are royalized, you know that it is amazing.

First of all, the nature of the work of celebrities and scientists is different, the job of celebrities is to entertain the public, and the higher the popularity of A-list stars, the higher the remuneration they receive for acting, singing, and doing activities. The job of scientists is to quietly study new fields and study new technologies, and their biggest income is their salary, and only scientists with special contributions can enjoy special allowances from the state.

There are many ways for celebrities to make money, and shooting advertisements is one of the main high-income **. Because celebrities have a strong ability to "bring goods", many manufacturers do not hesitate to spend millions to invite celebrities to cheer for their products.

Now whether you turn on the TV or **, is it not a star advertisement that catches the eye? Now that's it**, the effect of using celebrities to shoot advertisements is really good, this is the road to wealth paved by the market for celebrities, have you ever heard of a product that asks scientists to shoot advertisements?

Even if you don't advertise to others, the influence of first-line stars is there, and you can open a ** or restaurant casually, all of which are "star stores", and you don't have to worry about having no business. Financially minded celebrities have long invested in being bosses, and they are involved in various industries, and the more money they make, the more money they make. How can scientists have the time and energy?

Their minds are all about scientific research projects.

Celebrities probably belong to the highest-income group, not only the income of scientists cannot be compared with them, but also those ordinary people such as workers, farmers, small business bosses, etc., who can compare their income with celebrities? The remuneration of other people's plays is an astronomical amount that we can't earn in our lifetime.