Is Canon IXUS150 better or Sony W390? Please teach with high fingers?

I also have a camera from Canon, the Ixus 80 IS, the predecessor of this one...

After buying a camera, I realized that I didn't need to spend so much effort to choose a consumer-level card machine.

LZ's situation is that the camera's mode is not adjusted well?,Try again when you adjust it to automatic.,If it hasn't solved the problem, it may be a problem with the light.,It's impossible to completely restore a card like this.

I'm also using Canon myself.,I've compared it with Sony.,Looking at the shooting effect of the two on the computer.,It's really better than Canon.,It's suitable for T300.。

First of all, the card machine only knows if it has been used, and it should be used in a specialty store to distinguish the difference, and the imaging effect can only be seen when it is taken to the computer;

In the competition of card machines, there are two major manufacturers, Sony and Canon, and Canon's imaging effect and color reproduction are better than those of Sony cameras, so Canon is recommended!

There are also Canon's telescopic lenses, which are better for lighting

I was also helping my classmates look at the ixus105 a few days ago, and I think this camera is very cost-effective now.

Good luck LZ, if there is any other question can mp me.

Canon's IXUS series are all fashionable machines, good-looking, W390 machine is okay, but if you want to buy W390, it is better to buy WX1, cost-effective, I just bought it for a week, and now the price is about 1720 yuan!

The design of Canon's IXUS series card cameras continues the style of its predecessors, while also inheriting the well-made metal body and sleek shape of Canon's IXUS series cameras. Compared to the camera of a year ago, the Ixus 105 has undergone a slight change in appearance, with a "waist-cinching" treatment for the entire camera, which makes the Ixus 105 look slimmer and more stylish.

The 390's good has panoramic scanning, Canon's doesn't.

Personally, I think the W390 is good. The W390 is equipped with the top G-series lens from Minolta, with a wide angle of 24mm and a maximum aperture of cracking, which is better than the 130 lens in the card machine. The LCD is wider.

All other parameters are not very different. **Slightly lower on MS W390.

Sony W390 can't compare with Canon's 130 It's not a grade to compare with Canon 200 But Canon video doesn't support optical zoom W390 can optically zoom and it's a large aperture.

Of course, it's Sony's W390, but if you're not in a hurry, just buy it after a while, the current W390 is produced domestically, and the next batch will arrive immediately and will be original in Japan. Definitely arrives in a month at the latest!

210 is better.

Don't compare the cost performance of DC cameras. Quality is the most important.

Resistant or not durable. It is used for daily living functions. Stable and unstable ...and other conditions.

Of course, if you choose appearance over quality. More than value for money. That's another story.

2 units are good. But Sony came out of the camera too quickly. And the durability is not as good as the canon.

210 beats 390

If you don't have a lot of budget, 105 and 130 are also recommended

It is recommended to buy Canon, Canon and Sony's are not bad, but I still think Canon's color is a little better for specific use, and Canon's photo quality is very good.

The price is about 200, the wide-angle end is more than the 390, so 2mm ixus's main card Canon's optical image stabilization is slightly better Sony's Zeiss lens sells well 390 There is nothing to say Sony is like that It doesn't work in the middle Of course, it looks almost the same when you shoot It's almost no difference if you don't have a professional test If you don't have a professional test, you don't turn on the flash when shooting at night The white point is more serious I've used 110 200 It's the same The customer service explained that the lens sensitivity is too high Reflecting dust in the air About such complaints, of course, if you don't turn on the flash, the effect is great! Sony's words, my friend, that used it a few times, it feels okay, at least it won't disappoint you too much, but you can check their respective professional reviews, and you'll find the gap, but this kind of thing, I personally think it's hard for us to look at it ordinarily, and I'm a Canon fan, I recommend you to buy ixus, buy 110 if you buy a cost-effective price, and if you like the touch screen, then 200, and it's almost the same.

First of all, these two machines are similar, although Canon is said to be the boss of the camera industry, but his technology is reflected in high-end cameras such as SLR, and the card is very similar to Sony, and it is difficult to distinguish the winner from the loser. However, Canon's card player is less cost-effective than Sony. Sony camera is relatively simple and convenient to operate,Transmission does not need to use third-party software,Plug in OK like a USB disk,And the appearance is fashionable、Pull the style。

So I still recommend you to buy Sony! Hehe.

Support Canon I'm selling cameras.

First of all, I bought a Sony W390 today I'm at home I'm saying that we're not professional Professional can't buy good things at this price right, my reason for buying is which is more cost-effective, on the line You said I'm right?

I use ixus130, I think it's beautiful, it's quick to use, and I think it's very good.

Personally, I think Sony's W390 is more practical for home use.

Now the evaluation of Canon is not good Look at the digital camera brand ranking in January 2010, from the comparison between the digital camera brand in January 2010 and December 2009, Canon's attention ratio this month has decreased compared with the previous month, Sony's attention ratio has risen, Nikon's attention has declined, although Canon is said to be the boss of the camera industry, but his technology is reflected in high-end cameras such as SLR, and the card machine is similar to Sony's But Canon's card machine is less cost-effective than Sony. Because Sony can achieve optical zoom in video (it's okay to replace DV for the time being) Canno optical zoom Sony W390 has panoramic shooting and a large aperture Isn't the card machine just a cost-effective and practical camera for home use.

The imaging is very clear, and the quality is very good, if the light ratio is clear and the quality is half a catty.

W390 is recommended

I'm depressed, I'm hesitating, hey.

pwort shot sx 210 is, price: yuan;

Nikon CoolPix L120, price: yuan;

I saw it on the side of Maliandao.

It is recommended to save some more money to buy an entry-level SLR.