Are there patents for broken welding wire Are there patents for all products?

Some. Here are some of the patents I've helped you find:

Name Broken welding wire.

Application number, filing date.

Disclosure (Announcement) No. 2426397

Publication (announcement) day.

Classification Number: B23K35 02; B23K35 12 main classification number B23K35 02

Applicant (patent) by Liu

Inventor (designer) Liu

**People: Hua Deming.

Patent ** Institution: Xuzhou Patent Office.

Address 221008 No. 3, Cuizhuang Community, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, 2 302 Country** Jiangsu(32).

Category Classification 25e

Abstract: A kind of broken welding wire, which belongs to welding wire. Put a bottom plate at the bottom of the groove of the steel plate, weld a weld at the bottom of the groove of the steel plate, then fill the groove with broken welding wire, and then weld a weld on the upper surface of the broken welding wire, because the size of the broken welding wire is 0 4-0 8 mm, the length is 0 4-0 8 mm, and the conductivity is good, under the normal working current of welding, the broken welding wire is very easy to melt into liquid, and the broken welding wire melted into liquid penetrates everywhere in the groove, fills all the gaps in the groove, and melts into one with the welded workpiece, the weld *** Smooth, beautiful, the welded workpiece does not produce thermal deformation, resulting in unexpected effects.

Name: Welding method of mixing broken welding wire with iron powder.

Application number, filing date.

Disclosure (Announcement) No. 101003107

Publication (announcement) day.

Classification Number: B23K9, 235(; b23k9/035(;b23k35/22(

Main classification number B23K9 235 (

The applicant (patent) is Liu Kun.

Inventor (designer) Liu Kun; Liu Chunjiang.

**People: Hua Deming.

Patent ** Institution: Xuzhou Huaihai Patent Office.

Address: 221008 fifth floor, Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Center, Science and Technology City, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province.

Country** Jiangsu (32).

Category classification. Summary:

A welding method of mixing broken welding wire with iron powder, which belongs to the welding method of mixing broken welding wire with iron powder. Lay broken welding wire and iron powder in the weld, add a backing plate at the bottom of the weld, use a welding machine, and directly weld the weld with broken welding wire and iron powder; Laying broken welding wire and iron powder, laying in layers; Or for laying broken wire and iron powder in layers according to the rules of the pattern. This welding method, according to the laying method of broken welding wire and iron powder with a certain weight ratio, broken welding wire and iron powder layering or graphic layering, the broken welding wire and iron powder are welded as filler materials to the welding material, as long as the weld of the welding material is welded once, the whole process of welding is completed, electric energy is saved, the welding method can realize the high efficiency and micro-deformation welding of the thick plate and the ultra-thick plate of a single stress state, and the welding of weak alloy or alloying can be carried out on the part of the welding material according to the process needs.

If you want to know if this thing is patented, you should hire someone to search it for you in the patent database.

Not necessarily. It depends on what kind of product! Among the invention patents, the method of ** disease that cannot be applied for and the products that have been changed according to natural phenomena cannot be applied.

Therefore, you have to apply for a patent, or identify whether it is a patented product to determine whether it has the conditions for a patent.

Not necessarily, some products cannot be patented, even if it is judged to be a patent with the standard of previous patent applications, but he cannot apply for a patent, for example, Qi Liangchong's patent cannot be applied for in the invention slag collision patent: some products that have been changed according to natural phenomena cannot be applied. Therefore, you have to apply for a patent, or identify whether it is a patented product to determine whether it is eligible to apply for a patent.

There is no such statement. A patent is a patent, and a copyright is a copyright.

There must be, otherwise how to protect the works you have innovated.

The difference between copyright and patent.

Copyright advantages:

1.Software copyright is generated after the completion of software creation, and software copyright registration can also be carried out to play a similar role as notarization (proof of rights, when the software copyright is carried out, it is conducive to the smooth completion of the transaction; At the same time, the certification of the national authority will multiply the value of your software works).

2.Copyright allows you to take protective measures to stop others from pirating your software when they pirate it. In other words, others can't make the same or similar software system with the same ** as you.

As for the images, portraits, etc., you can also have the right to prohibit others from using the same or identical images, portraits, etc.

Copyright disadvantages:

1.Copyright protects only the expression of computer software, not its ideological composition.

2.Therefore, software developers, they can study your software, understand your ideas, and rewrite the software according to your ideas, so they can completely not infringe your copyright. Undoubtedly, they have stolen the most valuable thing in the software, which is the software conception skills and technical solutions.

In short, software copyright is not capable of protecting the core of software.

Advantages of invention patents:

1.Compared with copyright protection, the patent law makes up for this shortcoming and greatly protects the technical solution form of software. (Protection is mostly the content of your software flowchart.)

The patent does not specify in which language and in what specific phrases. After authorization, the adoption of the idea by others may constitute infringement).

Disadvantages of invention patents:

1.To apply for a patent, the patented technical material must be disclosed. 2.After obtaining a patent, it is also necessary to pay a certain maintenance fee every year.

3.To apply for patent protection, you need to meet the conditions of novelty, inventiveness, and practicability, and there are not too many software that meet the requirements. 4.It can take two or three years to apply for and examine a patent, and patent protection is not suitable if the market cycle of the software is short.

Obtaining a patent certificate means obtaining a valid patent right, which is a misunderstanding of most patentees. However, this is not the case, the State Intellectual Property Office does not conduct substantive examination of utility model and design patents, and even if the inventor has applied for a patent for the same technical solution before the application, the subsequent application may still be granted. If no objection is filed, the patent rights are temporarily owned.

Once a request for invalidation is filed against a later patent, the later patent will inevitably be invalidated. As far as invention patents are concerned, although the CNIPA has conducted a substantive examination of them, it cannot ensure that there are no omissions in the search of relevant documents by the invention patent examination department. Therefore, obtaining a patent certificate only represents the approval of the patent application by the national intellectual property administrative organ, and does not mean that the patent right is truly valid.

In the act of confirming plagiarism, it is often necessary to distinguish it from an act that is similar in form:

1）.Plagiarism and exploitation of ideas, ideas, and opinions in copyrighted works. Generally speaking, the author's freedom to use the themes, themes, opinions, ideas, etc. reflected in another work to create new creations is legally permissible and cannot be considered plagiarism.

2）.Plagiarism and use of other people's works historical background, objective facts, statistics, etc. The copyright laws of various countries do not protect the historical background, objective facts and statistics expressed in the work, and anyone can use it freely.

However, completely copying the words of others describing objective facts and historical background may be found to be plagiarism.

3）.Plagiarism and fair use. Fair use is the legal basis for the author's exploitation of another person's work, and its scope is generally determined by the copyright laws of each country. Anything beyond the scope of fair use generally constitutes infringement, but it is not necessarily plagiarism.

4）.Plagiarism and coincidence. Copyright protects original works, not original works. If a similar work is created by the author completely independently, it cannot be considered plagiarism.

Some scholars believe that judging the difference between plagiarism and other behaviors can be analyzed from the following five aspects:

1）.Look at the extent to which the defendant has altered the original work.

2）.Look at the characteristics of the original work and the defendant's work.

3）.Look at the nature of the work.

4）.Look at the creative skills and the value of the work embodied in the work.

5）.Look at the defendant's intentions.

Do you have any inventions that have not been patented?

If it's a secret recipe, you should learn Coca-Cola.

Almost all Chinese patent holders spend money to buy disclosures, and it is very difficult to transfer patents. If you must apply, you can keep one of the recipes secret. The key is that you have to write a good manual and learn Zhao Benshan's fooling skills.

1. It is recommended not to use patent methods to protect, but to protect with trade secrets.