Someone said, I m not doing well, you come and try, how to go back?

Logic usually refers to a correct way of thinking to draw a reasonable conclusion according to known conditions, and to judge whether logic is correct, we must first recognize what problem the commentator is discussing, what conclusion is obtained, and what the argument is, and then we can judge whether the thinking process of the conclusion is logically correct. For the same sentence, it is necessary to combine the specific situation to accurately analyze the information contained in it.

What is the thesis? From this question, the critic's point of view is that a professional is not doing his job well.

Suppose it also points out the specific ** is not good). So the question is: Is the professional doing his job well?

And the implicit view of professionals is: a, I did a good enough job. Or b, I'm really not good enough, but I shouldn't be criticized by you.

The reason is: you can't do it as well as me.

There are the law of identity and the law of sufficient reason in the basic laws of logical thinking, and a common mistake in violating the law of identity is "shifting the topic" or "stealing the topic", and if the answer to the essay question in the exam is not what is asked, it must be 0 points (but in real life, do we have to answer all the questions, and answer the questions?). ）。A common mistake in violating the law of sufficient reason is "personal attacks", i.e., disparaging the ability and personality of others in order to oppose the arguments of others.

In this question, if in the current situation, professionals should make a correct argument about whether they do their job well according to the rules, such as facing a project client, for example, both parties agree to have a dialogue and discussion, then the professional's meaning of whether a or b is meaningful, first, assume facts to belittle the ability of others, in place of arguments for their own opinions, is guilty"Personal attacks"logical errors; Second, by misleading others to divert the topic to discuss "whether the critic is not as good as the professional" and "whether the critic is not as good as the professional, whether the critic has the right to criticize", it is a logical mistake to "shift the topic". <>

Speaking is a technical job, and when a professional is accused of being bad, he instead says such a thing, which is a very unsuccessful communication, and neither party is in a good mood.

I usually say that making design is a job for others to pick on thorns, and when you are done and show it to others, you can pick out thorns no matter what, and sometimes you even say that you designers have a problem with your brain, and so on, and so on, some of which have to be tactful and subtle expressions. Just like the National Center for the Performing Arts, the common people are commonly known as "blister eggs".

Since he has chosen the design industry, designers have to be open-minded and think from the perspective of others. When the other party accuses you of your ability, one is to argue with reason, two is to communicate reasonably, and the other is to calm the other party emotionally, rather than then challenge the other party's limits. <>

Usually when I encounter such people, I think they are hopeless, and then choose to be silent. People who say such things can basically be divided into several situations: 1. They are only responsible for their masters, and they look like slaves.

2. No sense of responsibility and lack of professionalism. 3. There is no moral bottom line and lack of education. In general, such people have limited abilities, deformed values and worldviews, survive in their own hysteria, and put themselves on the highest point of fantasy.

In some cases, for example, if the critic is too amateurish, a passerby, or lacks the questioning skills, has a bad attitude, and the professional has no intention or ability to have an in-depth discussion with the critic on the topic, then the professional is not logically wrong, because he is not obliged to answer all the questions and answer the questions, he has not reached an agreement with the critic that he has to follow the critic's topic, in fact, he does not want to talk at all, and because he feels offended, he fights back against the critic in this way. <>

Looking at the essence through the phenomenon, if someone says this to you, shouldn't you think about why first? This is only said when you accuse others of their work for no reason. Speaking is an art, even if others are really bad, remind or advise others in a formal or euphemistic way.

Instead of blaming others for the fruits of their labor with a "I know better than you" look. So when someone scolds you like this, either you turn around and leave, or you really try it and tell the other person that you are really doing a good job. But one thing, keep your mouth shut.

White-eyed to give him food, and said to him: Since you know, don't come and ask me, do it yourself...That's it for me at the same table

Just ignore him, next time I come to you and say that you don't know, and if you can, come to me?

To be honest, I don't really like such people, but if you tell him: then you are still very good. If he really does, he'll feel a little embarrassed, and if he won't, he'll be even more embarrassed, so it's best not to quarrel in this case.

Of course I don't like it, you don't trust this kind of person too much, it's not worth being a friend, he's not sincere. When you meet this kind of person, you have to make a knife mouth.。。

Kiss her and say I'm just trying to see if you can kiss.

I don't like people who are cheap and well-behaved, and if you meet this kind of person, don't pay attention to him.

In the words of the old man!! Hit him.

Maybe I'm kidding you!

Don't listen to them, everyone has their own roots.

Anticipating that the reciting of the Buddha would be swayed by the remarks of those who have studied other methods, the Master of Good Guidance said the following:

and those who believe deeply. Decide to build your heart. Spiritual practice. Never doubt mistakes. Don't be afraid of all other explanations, don't do different things, dissident opinions, and dissent, and retreat, and ask for it. Ordinary people are shallow in wisdom and deep in obstacles. If there are different interpretations, people quote more scriptures.

It's hard to get in the way. Witness to all the sins and obstacles, and ordinary people are not allowed to die. Yun He is difficult to deal with. Achieve faith. Decided to go straight. Don't be timid. Answer. If someone cites scriptures to prove that the clouds are not born. The walker is the cloud. Although the benevolent will prove it

Not raw. Whoever I wish will not be broken by you. Why.

But it's not that I don't believe in the scriptures. It's all faithful. However, when the Buddha said the scriptures.

Disposition. Don't do it. Pair the machine.

Interests. And he said that he had passed the scriptures. That is, it is not to say that the Sutra of Contemplation, the Sutra of Mida, etc.

Time. However, the Buddha preached and prepared for the machine. Times are different. That is, it is said that the interpretation of the Bodhisattva of Heaven and Heaven is said. Today, it is said that the two virtues of the Sutra are dispersed. Only Wei mentioned that after the Buddha was destroyed, the five turbidities and five sufferings and all ordinary people. Testimony lives. For this reason. I am now determined by this Buddhism.

Definitely pursued. Even if you and hundreds of trillions of people can't lead to the living. Only growth makes me confident in my life.

And the one who walks is even more talking. The benevolent listens. I will now decide to believe in your face.

Even if there are many bodhisattvas and arhats in front of the earth, there are even ten directions. All cite scriptures to prove that those who are not alive. I didn't have any doubts.

Only growth makes me pure faith. Why. Righteousness is determined by the words of the Buddha.

Do not be spoiled by anything.

Master Shandao is said to be the return of Mida.

Chanting the Buddha does not have to meditate to read, you can live, sit and lie down, and don't force yourself if you are afraid of chanting the Buddha quietly

It is very good to recite the Buddha, and it is very sacred to be able to believe in the Buddha's Dharma, but you should also study the Dharma more so that you can have a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the Dharma, so that you can have the ability to judge when others talk about the Dharma. It is recommended to listen to the lectures of Master Mystic Realm, in the name of Zen, and the four minds.

The general program for studying Buddhism is to take refuge, to be motivated, to keep the vows, to have the right view, and to stop contemplating. It is very good to recite the Buddha by name, but by reciting the Buddha by name, it is only by practicing meditation, and only by practicing meditation can we stop our troubles and prove that there is no way to endure life, and these things can only be known by studying the Dharma in depth. There is no problem in chanting the Buddha, you should continue to chant, and after studying the Dharma in depth, you will be happier to practice chanting the Buddha.

The benefits of chanting the Buddha are too many.

Don't look around ... This is the end of the Dharma ... Beware of the enchantment ...

There are 84,000 Dharma in Buddhism... Why are there so many of them? Because different beings have different root natures ...

The situation is different ... For example, they are all going to Beijing, some people have money and do not get motion sickness to take a plane, some people get motion sickness and take a train, some people like to make cars, some people love environmental protection and choose to ride a bicycle, and some people may not have much money and want to walk... So choose the method that suits you, and it's best to go deep...

Otherwise, take a plane, and before you get on the plane, you have to change to the train, but the train goes out not long after you get off and change to a car, and you don't know where to sit, whether you take it in the opposite direction and go down and change your walk... I'm lost in this way, let alone when I'm going to Beijing... No matter what method you encounter, you must know that there will always be suitable sentient beings, all of whom are to be admired...

But what method did you choose, and if you think it is suitable for you, don't give up, and keep going on this path... If you like chanting Buddha, then go and see more things about the Pure Land Method... Take a look at the teachings of the Pure Land Sect masters such as Master Yinguang and Old Master of Pure Space...

There is a difference between today's chanting of Buddha and what the Buddha taught in primitive Buddhism. As the Stars said, you don't know a lot about Buddhism, including the history of Buddhism, or even know nothing. When you talk about meditation, you mean meditation.

In fact, there is no such thing as inappropriateness, and there are 40 ways of stopping meditation taught by the Buddha, including chanting the Buddha, that is, the Buddha following the recitation. It's just that the Buddha's recitation at that time was very different from the Buddha's recitation today.

The Buddha's advice to practitioners is that solitude is best. In meditation, there are also so-called 'sitting', 'lying', 'standing', and 'walking'. When you talk about meditation, you're just sitting in meditation.

There is also standing meditation and walking meditation. In addition to zazen, there are also walking meditations. So there's nothing to frighten about, only your own ignorance and ignorance are scaring you.

You can go to the Path to Enlightenment** to see it. You'd better take a closer look.

In the Dhajagga Sutta Sutra, the Buddha said, "When you encounter calamity, you should only think of me, and then remember: The World-Honored One is indeed an arhat, an enlightened being, a clear deed, a good death, a worldly solution, a supreme master, a celestial teacher, a Buddha, and a world-honored one.

Here the Buddha has made it very clear that we should remember the merits of the Buddha, and the more we are afraid, the more we should remember the merits of the Buddha, and we will definitely not say that the more we practice, the more we are afraid.

Practice does not have to be meditation, but it can also be practiced, and even if you meditate, you can find a posture that you feel fit, such as sitting cross-legged on a stool if you are not used to it, and so on.

The practice of remembering the merits of the Buddha is called Buddha Meditation, in which a practitioner can first find a Buddha statue that he likes, focus on the Buddha statue and cultivate his joyful mind, then think about the meaning of the ten merits, and then find one of the ten merits that he likes the most and concentrate on it.

Of course, there are 40 ways to practice meditation, all of which can be practiced anytime, anywhere, while sitting, lying down, or walking.

It is clear from your question that you don't know much about other methods of practice and don't know much about the purpose of the Dharma, so it's a good idea to learn a little bit about the basic concepts of the Dharma.

It is recommended that you first read Venerable Mahinder's Do You Know Buddhism? 》

Our teacher, Shakyamuni Buddha, knew that in the current period of the end of the Dharma, "the evil teacher said the Dharma, like the sand of the Ganges". Tell us the four laws: 'According to the law, not according to the people, according to the righteousness and not according to the words, according to the righteousness and not according to the righteousness, according to the wisdom not according to the knowledge', to be able to abide by this teaching, although the Buddha is no longer alive, it is no different from the Buddha in the world.

What is the law? Classic. We discern good knowledge, and the decisions of good knowledge do not contradict the meaning of the scriptures; It doesn't matter if the words are different, the meaning can't be wrong, this is 'according to the meaning and not according to the language'.

But we must take the scriptures as the criterion, and the meaning of good knowledge determines that it does not contradict the scriptures, and if it violates the scriptures, it is not good knowledge. Therefore, the four laws are our guidelines. We don't believe some people's blogs, we only believe what the Buddhist scriptures say.

You don't have to be afraid, those who really study Buddhism must have the protection of the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, the protection of the dragons and gods, and the demons cannot disturb them.

Recite the Buddha honestly, survive in the Pure Land, without doubt, without interference, and without interruption.

The senior brother's heart is not stable enough, so everyone is like the same and is easily influenced by others.

Explain that your faith in the Pure Land sect is not enough, listen to the scriptures more and build up your faith.

How can you be afraid of chanting Buddha? It is just pure to recite alone, I may be a little afraid if I don't recite the Buddha alone, but senior brother still has to start with knowledge!

Just concentrate on Amitabha. Now is the end of the Dharma period, there are all kinds of situations, I can't because of one or two blogs and affect my heart of reciting Buddha and cultivating Buddha, no matter what others do, I only concentrate on Amitabha Buddha, which is the most convenient way to practice.

You all know that if you don't want to meditate, don't practice, who said that chanting Buddha is not good? If there is no superiority in the Dharma, if you concentrate on chanting the Buddha, you will definitely be able to pass away. This is what the so-called Tibetans mean by one teacher, one dharma, and one honorable.

First Teacher: Follow a good person to learn the Fa for life; One Method: Practicing only one method in your life (such as specializing in the Pure Land and reciting the Dharma); A Zun:

If every practitioner learns the Pure Land and recites the Dharma today, and tomorrow they go to learn other Tantric Dharmas, they will not be able to cultivate anything. Therefore, the landlord will concentrate on reciting the holy name of Amitabha Buddha, if you think what I said is reasonable, please fold your palms and sincerely recite Nam no Amitabha Buddha ten times, may you become attached to the Dharma and practice as soon as possible to become a Buddha.