Students scored 100 points in the test and were rewarded with VIP treatment , why did netizens ask

Because this so-called "reward" is particularly inappropriate! The teacher's obligation is to do his best to impart knowledge to the students and guide the students to establish the correct three views. Such vulgar "rewards" could have serious consequences if they were promoted.

1. Feeding rewards violate the "Code of Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Students", and there are many kinds of rewards that do not need to use such a means of making a decision. A netizen in Guizhou uploaded a paragraph**,**The middle school teacher took the dishes and chopsticks to feed the two students during the lunch meal,The reason is that these two students got 00 marks in this exam, and the students around them were very envious when they saw the teacher's actionsIn fact, not only netizens but also some self-leading authors who are engaged in education do not advocate the practice of male teachers, according to the requirements of China's "Code of Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Students", teachers should cultivate students' independence and autonomy during schoolThey were asked to do their own thing, and the teacher's act of feeding was a clear violation of that requirement, let the children who were originally independent rely on adults again, this kind of action is said to be a reward, but it is actually destroying the child.

Second, treating students differently may cause hierarchical discrimination in students' hearts, and it is impossible for students to establish correct three views. There is nothing wrong with the teacher wanting to reward the student with a perfect score, but this kind of feeding reward will most likely create a disagreement among the children, which will make them think that only the students who study well can be favored by the teacher, and the students who are not good at learning should put up with the teacher's neglectIn the long run, students with good grades may be discriminated against with students with low gradesAt that time, it will be difficult to reverse the situation.

There is also a more terrible situation, that is, in order to get the favor of the teacher, students do something against their will, such as plagiarism in exams or use other means to improve their ranking in the class, of course, this situation will be the worst resultNot everyone can get good grades in their studies, but as long as you do your best in the process of studyingAnd the teacher's approach completely breaks this statement, and re-turns grades into an indispensable thing in students, which is not the desired result of education, and students who learn for grades will be an extremely sad existence.

Finally: Scores are certainly a manifestation of learning knowledge, but as a teacher, you should still treat everyone equally, and this kind of practice of posing for feeding rewards is still moderate, after all, this has gone beyond the reward and has the flavor of show.

This is the differential treatment of students, this is the unfair treatment in education, so that students with good grades have preferential treatment, and students with poor grades are treated unfairly, which leads to the psychological health of students, and forms a life outlook that only uses grades to look at people.

Because studying well does not mean that you have privileges, and it does not mean that you can be treated differently. As a student, learning is only a task, and more important is learning to be a person and learn to do things, so this teacher's behavior is not conducive to the development of children, will breed conceit, and needs to be corrected in time.

Because this behavior of the teacher will make students develop a habitual thinking, that is, "as long as I have good grades, I can become a different person, no matter what I do, there is no problem". This kind of thinking pattern is not conducive to the child's growth and may lead the child down the wrong path.

Students scored 100 points in the test and were rewarded with "VIP treatment", and netizens asked to severely criticize the teacher because this would promote the privilege effect of students, cause inequality between students, and be detrimental to the common progress of students. The teacher's behavior is contrary to the principle of treating every student fairly.

Although the teacher's approach encourages students who do well in the exam, it is also obvious that the contrast will make many students who do not do well feel embarrassed. The criticism of netizens is justified and should be considerate of the emotions of all students.

Because students can get special treatment with a score of 100, which is unfair to other students and is not conducive to equal treatment in education, it is necessary to criticize teachers harshly.

Students score 100 points in the exam, and the teacher rewards them for feeding them personally, this kind of reward cannot be one-sided and unreasonable, it should be said that from multiple perspectives, there will be many different interpretations. A teacher in Bijie, Guizhou, after the student took the test of 100 percent, the reward for personally feeding was spread to the Internet, which caused heated discussions among netizens, some of whom thought that these students already have the ability to take care of themselves, and they are not kindergarten children, the teacher reward feeding is not instilling an idea with the child, that is, as long as the grades are good, there is no need to have the ability to take care of themselves, as long as the grades are good, the teacher or parents should do anything for me. I have to say that netizens' concerns are also right, and there are indeed such concerns.

However, I believe that the original intention of the teacher to reward the children who scored 100 points in the test is not to make the students lose their self-care ability, but to let the children feel the warmth of the teacher, and continue to be surrounded by this warmth to motivate the students to continue to improve.

There is a big problem with netizens' harsh denunciation of the teacher's education method, and I think his approach is not reasonable, but I don't think so. I think that this kind of reward method of the teacher can really make the child feel warmer, and then work harder to learn, because I also felt the warm reward brought to me by the teacher when I was a student, and it has been used to this day.

Therefore, no matter what things have to be divided into two, there is no need to be too up-and-line, in the child's innocent mind, it may not be possible to think that the teacher rewards the feeding, that is, to tell them that as long as they study well, they don't have to take care of themselves. What's more, the teacher's original intention was not like this, so many netizens' worries are really completely unnecessary in my opinion.

It's unreasonable, students will feel embarrassed to be fed by the teacher, it's good to be rewarded for studying well, but you also have to pay attention to the method.

Irrationality. If I were a student, not only would I not want this reward, but I would also deliberately fail the next exam to avoid this "reward" from the teacher. Because I feel embarrassed and uncomfortable.

Instead, a small notebook, a small eraser or even a piece of candy can make us happy for a long time.

Students score 100 points in the test, and the teacher rewards them for feeding them personally and saying that the students are worthy of this kind of service, which I personally think is particularly unreasonable, and instills bad utilitarian ideas and too much distinction between the importance of prompting grades to children who have not yet formed values.

I feel that this kind of reward is unreasonable and misleading to students. In this way, the teacher does not have a sense of majesty, so that the child has a sense of balance with the teacher, and even feels that he is a level higher than the teacher, which I don't think is advisable in this way.

I don't think it's reasonable, many students may feel that this kind of reward is not motivated at all, and they will also feel that they don't want to get this reward and deliberately don't study hard, I think we should choose some incentives that students are interested in.

Irrationality. I won't ask for this kind of reward, after all, the division commander is different, it's better to keep a distance, and you should still grasp the measure.

Students score 100 points in the test, and the teacher rewards them for feeding them personally, although this reward is reasonable, but it is too naïve and a little unimaginable.

Students score 100 points in the exam, and the teacher rewards them for feeding them personally, which is very reasonable and can inspire the child's confidence to study hard.

3. Not everyone wants to be fed, and the reward set by the teacher is also to encourage every student, and also hope that all students can do their best to get the reward. But to be honest, the reward of the teacher's feeding is not liked by all children, because being fed is not a capital worth showing off. Some children also don't like teachers, so naturally they don't like the reward of teachers feeding them, and even let those children who hate teachers deliberately get bad grades.

Regarding the fact that the teacher rewards the candidate with 100 points in the test and feeds the food himself, I think that as long as he is a student, he feels happy, and if the reward he wants to get is this, then why not the teacher.

I think this behavior is very wrong, there are many ways to encourage students to score 100 points, and this kind of feeding behavior should not be used, because students themselves should eat independently.

In fact, this is just a reward for the teacher, and it can be seen that the teacher is actually very concerned about the students' grades and is willing to use this kind of reward.

I think the teachers are very caring. In order to motivate students to learn, he came up with this idea so that students would be motivated to learn.

It's not right. Teachers should keep their distance from their students, as they are easily criticized by society and bring negative news.

I think this shows the encouragement of the teacher to the child, and it is a very good way to encourage the child to keep up the good work in a very kind way, which is better than some material rewards.

02. Netizens disagree with this method and feel that it is too embarrassing. First of all, many netizens don't understand this teacher's approach, it's just 100 points in the test, and you don't need to be fed with a reward, if you take a 100 point in a class, it depends on how you can feed it. And the children are all big, they don't need to be fed at all, and people can eat by themselvesWhat's going on?

But I want to say yes.,It's really okay to be rewarded like this.,Let's think about it.,Isn't it much better than giving a candy and a book? The teacher uses the simplest way to reward the students in the class to see, in addition to getting the teacher's attention for studying hard, they can also be fed by the teacher himselfIt's so powerful.

For example, when my niece goes to kindergarten, she reads textbooks aloud every day, and she is full of motivation, and whenever it is time to read, she will remind adults to read textbooks aloud. And her motivation is that the teacher said that the children who complete their homework will be rewarded with a little red flowerHow many small saffron can be exchanged for toys

03, finally. In fact, the teacher's original intention is really commendable, he didn't think it was so complicated, probably just to let other children learn seriously and compete with each other in this way, forming a positive learning environment. As for netizens who suspect the teacher's show,Rest well.

It's an improper method, the teacher's behavior is very bad, the student has hands and feet, and can eat by himself.

Improper method. Encouragement is a good thing, but it really doesn't feel good to encourage yourself to feed, and such encouragement is very controversial.

The method is not appropriate, the student scores 100 points, and the teacher should motivate the student in the language and in the usual educational process, and should not feed the student personally.

It's an improper method, the students have grown up and can eat by themselves, and there is no need for the teacher to feed them.

I think it's a bad method, because it's a reward method that is incomprehensible and doesn't give people the essence of it.

A teacher in Bijie, Guizhou personally fed the students to the fire, these students who were personally fed were because of the test 100 points, I thought this was a very controversial behavior, but I didn't expect that the following are all praises, although I can understand that the teacher's starting point is good, but no one will really ask questions about such behavior? <>

1, test 100 points of VIP treatment This happened in a kindergarten, ** in the picture you can see the teacher feeding a few children bite by mouth, the whole picture is happy, around also cast a lot of envy of the children, when someone asked why the teacher did this, the teacher said that the children work so hard of course to reward them, must let them enjoy the senior treatment, this treatment is to feed in person. <>

The teacher's intentions are good, and in most people's perceptions, spiritual rewards are better than material rewards, but is this really the case? It can be seen that this kindergarten belongs to a relatively poor kindergarten, and the surrounding facilities seem to be relatively simple, but why create a view that material rewards are more vulgar? It is not too much for poor children to crave some material rewards, and it does not necessarily have to be anything valuable, so it is good to reward children with small picture books or something.

2. Material rewards are not necessarily vulgar if they are not unreasonable if they are poor and carry out spiritual rewards, but this kind of spiritual reward is reflected in feeding, which may not be wise, self-care and hands-on eating is something that every child should learn, and it is strange to treat it as a reward, the only point of this reward is that it can be envied by peers and children, and I don't think it is a very praiseworthy thing. <>

In fact, there is a misunderstanding in the current mass education, that is, the material reward will make the child materialistic, in fact, many times it is just that the reward person overemphasizes the material benefits, and there is no problem with appropriate rewards, after all, there is a reward for hard work, and self-care and eating is the ability that every kindergarten child should learn, and it may need to think twice about it as a reward.

The teacher thinks that this is a reward because generally speaking, the relationship between teachers and students is more serious, and there are not so many intimate actions, and being able to feed in person also promotes the friendship between teachers and students.

Because the teacher feels that feeding the students in person is an encouragement to the students and a concern for the students, it is also a reward.