Without the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, how would world security be affected?

Updated on international 2024-08-01
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    It won't be. Today, there are basically no secrets in nuclear power from a technical point of view, and the real problem of nuclear power without universal equipment is not independent design and development, but follow-up matters such as independent manufacturing, equipment, storage, decommissioning and destruction, which involves a large amount of capital investment, which is not something that ordinary small countries can afford. The collapse of the former Soviet Union led to the influx of a large amount of nuclear materials into the international black market, and there was no chaos?

    In contrast, the biochemical **, which has a small investment, fast assembly, and difficult to verify for dual-use, is the first choice of these small countries, so it is also called the 'poor man's atomic bomb'.

    As for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the 1968 NPT only limits the number of States parties: "States Parties that possess nuclear weapons will not assist other States in acquiring such States"; The "non-nuclear** States parties will not solicit or accept such assistance or manufacture of them, and they will accept a safeguard regime to prevent the conversion of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes into nuclear**. In return, the parties undertake to advance and have the right to participate in the peaceful uses of atomic energy.

    The problem is that the signatories to this treaty are either countries that already possess nuclear technology (these countries have no interest in granting their own nuclear technology) or countries that have no need for nuclear technology at all (like West Germany at the time).

    The treaty is not binding on countries that are not signatories. Israel, India, Pakistan, Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, and China did not accede to the treaty at the time.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    If it weren't for him, the world might be destroyed in the Gulf War, or, now that all countries are engaged in a nuclear race, the equipment will be more and more advanced, where will peace come from?

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    There are relatively few countries that have not acceded to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons**, represented by the DPRK. North Korea acceded to the treaty in April 1985 and withdrew in January 2003. As of January 2010, there were 189 States parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

    The purpose of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons is to prevent nuclear proliferation, promote nuclear disarmament and promote international cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The Treaty is the cornerstone of the international nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation regime and an important component of the post-war international security system. Since the conclusion of the Treaty, positive results have been achieved in promoting nuclear disarmament, preventing nuclear proliferation, and promoting nuclear energy for the benefit of mankind.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The regimes of the big countries are relatively stable, unlike the two-headed coup d'état in three days like some countries. This is also for the sake of the safety of all mankind. In addition, it is impossible and undesirable to achieve a nuclear-free world at this stage, and if all nuclear warheads are really destroyed, the conventional equipment of the United States will surpass that of other countries by more than one generation.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was established in 1953Year 12Month, American **Dwight DEisenhower presented to the eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly".Atomic Energy for Peaceful Uses".

    I. Background to the Treaty

    During World War II, in order to promote Japan's early surrender, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, and the buildings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed after the atomic bomb**, many people disappeared in the heat wave, and the survivors also had many sequelae, and the resulting huge power made all countries in the world secretly shocked and began to invest in the research of the atomic bomb, and then the Soviet Union successfully detonated the atomic bomb in 1949, and other countries followed, Neither the United States nor the Soviet Union wanted to leave the use of the atomic bomb in the hands of a third party, so they negotiated in secret.

    2. The importance of treaties to humankind

    The Treaty is the legal basis for the international disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation system and an important guarantee for the safety of global life after World War II.

    On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty, on March 10, 2020, the foreign ministers of China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States highlighted the importance of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) to all mankind in their joint statement.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons" was proposed by the United States in July 1968, and his proposal effectively prevented global nuclear proliferation, stopped a large number of countries from researching nuclear weapons, and ensured world peace to a certain extent!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was put forward in 1968, and its great significance is that it is conducive to reducing the number of nuclear weapons, saving the people of the world from nuclear threats, and maintaining world peace and tranquility.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The Treaty, which was proposed in 1968 and entered into force in 1970, was concluded with the aim of avoiding the danger of nuclear war as much as possible and taking measures to ensure the security of all peoples.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    After the conclusion of the UN review, many people also expressed great regret over the result, and China also expressed regret over the fact that the "NPT" was not adopted during the review. The United States, on the other hand, is very happy, and the reason why there is such a move is also because the United States' nuclear weapons are more advanced than other countries, and in the 60s of the last century, the two major powers of the Soviet Union and the United States showed their nuclear weapons in the arms race, and the size of these nuclear weapons is also frightening. And Russia is also the only country that has raised objections, and the Russians have not objected to the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, but because there is an additional element in this treaty, and this content is also unacceptable to Russia.

    Because it is a basic treaty, all member states of the United Nations need to pass this treaty to be implemented, and Russia has always been more supportive of treaties on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Because the number of nuclear weapons of many major countries is also relatively staggering, but this time in the United Nations review, Russia chose to stand up against it, in fact, it is understandable, because this content is very unfavorable to Russia, and the manipulator behind the scenes is the United States. <>

    The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant has been under the control of the Russian army for a long time, and in the agreement, Russia was required to hand over important facilities to Ukraine, and it also stated that in this military operation, Russia's approach to Ukraine is incorrect. This is also deliberately done by the Americans, in order to set a trap for Russia, and Russia will also be smeared. <>

    The United States has always been in a leading position in science and technology, and its economic development is better than that of other countries, so it is more experienced in making nuclear weapons. Nuclear ** is also very amazing in the deterrent side and the big brother, if these nuclear ** are not controlled, once the consequences are unimaginable, but the United States has always wanted to develop a powerful nuclear **.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The United States likes to make trouble the most, and if this treaty is not passed, it will aggravate the situation between Russia and Ukraine, which is a profitable practice for the United States.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The main reason is that if the nuclear treaty is passed, all countries will use nuclear weapons to know clearly, and the United States will not be able to act so recklessly with a fierce argument, and he is also afraid of the impact of nuclear ** on him, so it is said that they are the happiest.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons** is the world's most important nuclear arms control treaty, and the failure to adopt the review means that some Member States voted against it.

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also known as the "Non-Proliferation Treaty", is the world's most important nuclear arms control treaty, which was opened for signature on July 1, 1968 in Washington, Moscow and London, respectively, when 59 member states signed the treaty.

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons** consists of 11 articles, the main contents of which include: nuclear states cannot directly or indirectly transfer nuclear weapons or nuclear installations to non-nuclear states, nor can they assist in their production; Non-nuclear States pledge not to develop, not to accept, not to seek to acquire nuclear ** or nuclear devices.

    According to the agreement, the treaty will last for 25 years, during which time meetings will be held every five years to review the implementation of the treaty. There are already 191 countries that are party to the Treaty, and it must be unanimously adopted by those 191 States in order to implement it.

    Recently, the United Nations review of the "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty" ended, but the result was a regrettable failure of 190:1, the review failed to pass, and Russia voted against.

    Russia has always maintained that the United States, Russia, and other countries that possess nuclear weapons, in particular, should strictly control their number or reduce them on the existing basis.

    But this time, the Russian side voted against, what is the reason why Russia can insist on voting against it despite the votes of other countries?

    Obviously, this treaty is aimed at Russia, and behind this is the United States. The content of this treaty is: to guarantee the control of Ukraine over the Zaporizhzhya NPP.

    In fact, the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant has already been occupied by Russia, and with this treaty, Russia must hand over the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant. This proves that Russia's military actions against Ukraine are illegal.

    Naturally, the Russians will not agree, this is a trap deliberately set by the people of the United States, and it will not be long before it will be used by the West to smear Russia.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In fact, it is a peace treaty that restricts military warfare, which means that there may still be many countries that want to provoke war and do not want to promote peace.

  14. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It's a kind of peace treaty, and I think that if it wasn't passed, it means that there are some countries that they might want to attack other countries with nuclear weapons.

  15. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) is a fundamental treaty that applies to all 191 member states of the United Nations, and must be approved by all 191 member states before it can be implemented.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Among the following countries that have not acceded to the NPP, the following countries are amusing ().

    a.Japan. b.North Korea.

    c.Iran. d.United States.

    Correct answer: B

Related questions
27 answers2024-08-01

Flowers and trees will flourish, rivers, lakes and seas will be more beautiful, the air environment will be good, animals will thrive, the biological chain will not be destroyed, and it will be completely natural. >>>More

54 answers2024-08-01

There will definitely be a lot of stability, there will be no more football hooligans, and there will be no more football riots, but one thing is for sure that there will be some yo-yo riots or hooligans, anyway, it will definitely not be idle, is it idle, there must be something to do! Why else would so many people do it!

26 answers2024-08-01

If there is no Confucius.

There would be no Mencius, Xunzi, Mozi, Zhu Xi, Wang Yangming! If there was no Confucius, there would be no Confucian thought spread to the outside world, and there would be no aristocratic spirit in the West today! Without Confucius, there would be no idea of benevolence and democracy, and there would be no democratic election system in the world! >>>More

16 answers2024-08-01

If there is no helplessness in life, then life is meaningless, what people do is smooth sailing, what do people still learn! What is the point of living? I have experienced a lot of things, and sometimes I think about why God is so unfair to me, and whether it is too cruel to torture me again and again! >>>More

7 answers2024-08-01

If there is no love in the world, there will be no meaning in human life. >>>More