Can the Discipline Inspection Commission handle a case alone, and can the Discipline Inspection Comm

The Commission for Discipline Inspection cannot handle cases alone, and must follow the procedures for discipline inspection and supervision in handling cases

1. Carry out external investigation from the clues of the case source; 2. The Standing Committee of the Commission for Discipline Inspection shall discuss and file the case, issue a notice of case filing or a notice of supervision to the party group of the party committee of the unit and myself, set up an investigation team, conduct a preliminary investigation of the case, and write a preliminary investigation report; 3. Submit an application to the discipline inspection organ at the next higher level, and upon consent to take necessary measures (including "shuanggui" and "two fingers") or ask the party committee at the same level to cooperate with the public security, procuratorate, auditing, finance, and other units or departments in the investigation, and further obtain strong evidence (including investigation records, investigation certificates, copies of public security procuratorial inquiry records, relevant accounts, bills and copies, and physical objects), and all materials must be stamped and signed. Fingerprints must be stamped where there are changes. Go to the organization or personnel department to copy the personal information of the subject of the investigation, and the organization department will seal it and take effect; 4. The investigation of the case is completed and the investigation report is written; 5. Form meeting materials, and ask the respondent to sign the opinion and name and affix the fingerprint; 6. Require the respondent to write a written review; 7. The investigation team of the Commission for Discipline Inspection shall send two or more people to the party branch or party committee where the subject of the investigation is located to convene a special meeting to listen to the opinions of the party members and comrades on the handling of the subject of investigation one by one, and to vote by a show of hands.

The Party branch to which the meeting belongs shall form the minutes of the meeting and the handling opinions into a written report to the Commission for Discipline Inspection. If the subject of the investigation is the secretary of the party branch, he shall be exempted from voting at a meeting, and the party branch to which he belongs shall issue a certificate and submit it to the discipline inspection commission at a higher level. 8. Classify all circumstantial evidence materials, investigation reports, meeting materials, personal review and case filing and investigation procedure materials, and send them to the case trial room for trial.

In strict accordance with the "Disciplinary Regulations", the "Supervision Law" and the "24-character" policy, the case is to be handled qualitatively and disciplined. 9. Notify the subject of the investigation to conduct a trial conversation, inform him of the facts of the violation of discipline and the handling of discipline, and request a signature and stamping. If they are party members and cadres at or above the deputy section level, they should also be studied and decided by the meeting of the standing committee of the party committee at the same level.

10. Issue punishment documents. Send a copy of the disciplinary document, the investigation report and the personal review to the organizational department for archiving. The punishment documents shall be sent to the person and the Party group of the Party committee to which he belongs, and to the relevant departments; 11. The investigation and trial of the case are concluded.

The investigation file and trial file materials are stored in separate volumes.

Where it is not, there are generally specific provisions, and the case must be handled in accordance with the provisions. Generally, several people will form an investigation team to investigate, and one person will definitely not work.

The Commission for Discipline Inspection cannot collect evidence alone.

After preliminary verification, the discipline inspection and supervision organs have taken Qing Minyin and the targets of supervision on Party members and cadres.

Suspected of violating discipline or violating the law or committing a crime abusing public office.

Disciplinary or legal responsibility is required.

shall file a case for review and investigation.

Those who report to the Department of Approval for approval of the case shall already have some facts and evidence of violations of discipline or violations of law or crimes abusing public office, and have the documents to conduct a review and investigation.

Where the requirements for case filing are met, the undertaking department shall draft a report for approval of the case filing review and investigation, and upon review and approval by the principal responsible person for the discipline inspection and supervision organ, and report to the principal responsible person for the Party committee at the same level for approval, the case shall be filed for review and investigation.

The decision to file a case for review and investigation shall be announced to the person being reviewed and investigated, and the principal responsible person for the Party committee (Party group) to which the person under review and investigation belongs.

The principal responsible person for the discipline inspection and supervision organs shall preside over the convening of a special meeting attended by the relevant responsible persons of the discipline inspection and supervision organs for the review and investigation of persons suspected of serious violations of discipline or violations or crimes abusing public office, to study and approve the review and investigation plan.

The relevant responsible persons of the discipline inspection and supervision organs approve the establishment of a review and investigation team, determine the plan for reviewing and investigating, and the plan for external investigation, and approve matters such as inquiries into important information and the seizure of assets involved in the case.

The principal responsible person of the supervision, inspection, and review investigation department organizes research and puts forward review and investigation interview plans, external investigation plans, and disposition opinions and suggestions, examines and approves general information inquiries, and checks and reviews the investigation and evidence collection.

Except for particularly major and complicated cases, which should be handled by a deliberative group of two or more people.

Provisions of the Discipline Inspection Commission of the Communist Party of China on the Working Procedures for the Trial of Cases of Party Member Violations of Discipline".

Article 9: After the trial departments of discipline inspection commissions at all levels accept a case, they shall promptly designate a person to handle it. Except for cases where the circumstances are simple, two people should generally handle it, and especially major and complicated cases should be handled by two or more people, and one of them should be designated to preside over it.

This is a two-fold problem:

One is the natural level

After a case is filed against the subject of discipline inspection and supervision, all violations of discipline and laws by a person shall be investigated.

The other one is the practical level

In fact, it is impossible to find out all of a person's violations of discipline and law.

The first reason is that any power requires the consumption of corresponding resources, even with the most drastic measure - lien. The maximum period of retention in custody is 6 months, and the establishment of a special task force is also limited in terms of human, material and power resources. It's impossible to find out completely.

Especially for those who have more problems with violations of discipline and laws and regulations.

Clause. 2. Even if the subject of discipline inspection and supervision has full willingness to explain all violations of discipline and laws and regulations. It is also because of the long time, vague memory and other factors, it is impossible to remember it completely.

Clause. 3. The second situation - the subject of discipline inspection and supervision has the complete willingness to explain all violations of discipline and laws and regulations, which is very difficult to occur. Even those who seem to have fully cooperated with the discipline inspection and supervision will have something to hide.

The first defeat. Fourth, there is no need. Most of the criminal acts have been identified, and the penalties for violations of discipline and regulations will not be higher than those for criminal acts.

Moreover, each of the violations of discipline and regulations requires a large amount of evidence to verify and corroborate. There is no need to find out all the violations of discipline and regulations.