Why do your relatives advise you not to take children after you are divorced?

This is because your relatives feel that the child will drag you down, and they are afraid that it will be difficult for you to find a partner with the child after the divorce, but this is a very irresponsible behavior, and they do not consider the child's feelings at all, whether to take the child or not, and it depends on how you and the child feel.

I think you should be a woman, most women divorce relatives will tell him not to have children, because it is difficult for women to remarry with children. This is the current social phenomenon, even if the mother loves her children more, it is more difficult, many men can't accept women, and the conditions that can be accepted with children are basically not better than women.

Because you are divorced, having a child will affect you to find the next one, in this society divorce is actually very deductive, if divorced with a child, it is even more difficult, it is difficult to find a better other half. So your relatives advise you not to take children, and they are also thinking about your future.

Relatives are mainly afraid that you will have no foothold with your children, no economic **, afraid that you will live too hard, and that your children will work too hard with you, and they are also afraid that it will affect your future life.

You are divorced, living alone, there are many troubles, plus you still have to reorganize the family in the future, with children you will encounter a lot of troubles that you can't imagine, family and relatives will also worry about you, in order for you to have a good home in the future, family and relatives: will advise you not to take children, so as not to drag you down.

Divorced relatives advise you not to take children, because you think about it later, because the burden of living with children is heavy, reorganizing the family, and there will be disagreements between the two because of the children.

This may be because many relatives feel that children are a burden and will affect you from finding a second marriage partner.

It doesn't matter what others say, he is your relative, because he is towards you. I'm afraid that you will be stressed and burdened, so I won't let you have children. According to yourself, if you have the financial ability to raise the child by yourself, then if you don't have the ability, it's best not to do it, because you don't have good conditions to bring the child.

Also save the child to suffer.

Family members are planning for your future, and you are afraid that having children will affect you to find a partner in the future. It's easier to find without kids. And there are not so many worries, they are all considered like this for your own good.

Actually, I think most people say this because it is for your future, because it is easier to enter a new life in the future without children, but I think it is more difficult for most mothers.

Because it is more difficult to marry again with a child, relatives think that you need to remarry, and it is difficult to find another one with better conditions, don't listen to others, go along with your own wishes, and don't abandon your children at will.

If you are divorced and don't take children, it's for you to think about it in the future, it's too much burden to take care of children, so that the man is clean, if it's two children, one for each person, anyway, you can try not to have children or try not to have children.

If you are divorced, your relatives will persuade you not to have children, it may be that they are good for you, because having children will be a burden in your future life, so it is not recommended that you have children, which is completely up to you.

Because of the current social situation, it is very difficult to raise a child, you have to work alone to earn money, and you have to take care of the child, maybe no matter how tired, maybe the child will also suffer with you, one day or two days, it is right to persuade you.

First of all, if you take care of children alone after divorce, the financial pressure will be very great, and secondly, many people feel that if you take a child after divorce, it will have a great impact on your future, so many people are reluctant to have children.

Relatives are also for your good, because it is difficult to get married again with children now, so the best way is to be able to be alone, so that you can find the other half that suits you.

So that you can have a better life in the future, and when you marry a husband, you will have no children as a burden. Besides, if you want your children to remarry, watching the episodes on TV will sometimes appear in life.

Because if a woman is divorced, it must be very difficult to find her favorite marriage partner with her own children, and many people are very disgusted with a woman with children, so your relatives have a lot of ideas.

Because now if the children are not too suitable for work, there is no money for the children to spend if they don't go to work, and they don't have much energy to take care of the children when they go to work.

This is because you have children after the divorce, which will affect your next marriage, and the blind date partner is unwilling to raise children who have nothing to do with him.

Because children can sometimes be a drag on you, some relatives will want you to live better after the divorce.

1.You may have to marry someone else in the future, and it will always be not good to have a child, what if the other person treats him badly.

The meaning is simple, it is not very easy to remarry with children. will be persuaded.

The so-called divorce without children is for the purpose of reorganizing the family in the future.

Because it is difficult for a single parent to find a partner for a boy or a girl with children.

Your relatives know about it. After a divorce, it is difficult to find a partner with children.

If the woman is the case, they may think that you are too tired to carry it alone, that is, you must be too busy to work and take care of the children, and then it may be easier to find a remarriage in the future.

I saw an article about a woman and her husband divorced, twin boys, one for each couple. Soon, the husband found a divorced woman who had no children. The woman with a boy was ignored because she was carrying a boy, and her mother kept blaming her for not having children for divorce and not being able to find a partner.

She herself was grumpy and took her anger out on her children. The article devotes a lot of space to saying that divorced women should not have children, and also analyzes why many men are reluctant to find a woman with children when they remarry.

The article analyzes the current social phenomena very objectively and realistically. I am a woman who does not bring children, but when a friend introduces me to someone, I will tell people that I have a child, although he is not by my side now, but if one day his father can not take care of his son, my mother has the responsibility and obligation to take care of him, the closest person in the son is his father and then my mother, no matter what kind of changes occur, I am his mother, I want to be able to accept my person, not only can love me, accept me, cherish me, but also accept me as a mother. Some people say that I am too stubborn, and the conditions are okay, why should I put this fact out with others first.

In fact, for parents who remarry, they both have children, is there a difference between the children and not around, in my eyes there is really no difference, they all say that women who do not have children are easy to find a partner, I think I can only say maybe, the two are divorced, and the father or mother who takes the child with him can experience being able to watch the child grow up and take care of the child himself. Fathers and mothers who do not have children change their family affection to another way to care for and love their children. That family affection is not because of anyone, and it can't be erased because of the achievement of a new family.

That's why I say that if you can accept that we have lived a little bit more than others, and that you can face the harm that our divorce has brought to our children, don't cruelly ask a divorced mother or father to draw a line between him or her children. Share on:

If it's a woman, a girl, I suggest you take the child. Because the child is still happier with his mother. If it is a woman and a boy, I suggest that you do not bring children, because the man's family will also be good at taking care of children, because it is a boy, and you will have difficulties in finding your other half with children, and the other half will also have children, and even more so boys.

So that's what I suggest. In the case of the man, if you want the boy to be less strict with you when you find your other half, because you already have the eldest son. Not to mention if you have a well-off family.

But I think it's better not to get divorced if you don't get divorced. Divorce is an indelible harm to children.

Hello, I'm glad to answer your questions, to be honest, mainly from 2 aspects, the first and most important, the economic aspect, whether you can raise yourself, the future children go to college, get married and have children, buy a house, can you afford it. Second, in life, do you still want to get married, because it is difficult to find children when you are married. Mainly from these two aspects to consider.

But divorce is actually very difficult for the child's heart to accept, because the child must want to be by the mother's side, and at the same time have the father by his side. So divorce can be said to be a tragedy for children. But here if I take your personal standpoint, I suggest that you consider these 2 aspects, dear

What you're asking is actually a specious question.

The so-called question of "whether to have children in divorce" is, legally, actually a question of who will take custody of the children after the divorce. It means that from the day the child is born, no matter whether the child's parents "should have" or "should not" when they divorce, the child will always be the child of the divorced party and can never be changed.

Knowing the above facts, then, that is to say, the question of whether a woman should become the guardian of the child after divorce. In general, when a husband and wife divorce, children under the age of two are in the custody of their mothers in principle; For children between two years and under ten years old, the court will decide who should be the guardian of the children according to the actual circumstances of the divorced man and woman, and from the perspective of being more conducive to raising the children; For children over the age of 10, the child must also be consulted. Of course, I'm talking about it from a judicial point of view.

From the perspective of daily life, whether it is a woman or a man, not becoming the guardian of the child is undoubtedly a little convenient for the man and woman to remarry in the future, that is, to start a new family. But as far as traditional "common sense" is concerned, if a woman does not even "want" the child she has born, she will also be accused by society of the lack of motherhood of the child's mother. One of the aspects that praise a mother as "great" is her selfless love for her children.

Think about it, how can a mother who doesn't even want children be called "great" and "selfless"? Of course, there are special exceptions to the situation where it is impossible to afford the support of the child.

If you understand the above, the answer to "should a woman have children after divorce" should be considered clear. What do you think?