Strictly implement the principle of one household, one house , if there are houses in both the city

Yes, as long as you don't move your hukou out, or a rural hukou, then you can build a house on a homestead or buy a commercial house in the city, and there is no direct connection between the two, so don't worry. <>

If your hukou is still in the countryside, then the homestead.

Yes, you can inherit, all your property in the countryside is valid, but as long as you move out of the hukou, you will no longer enjoy some of the welfare policies in the countryside, but you can enjoy some of the policies brought to you by the city. Because many parents have moved out of the household registration because of the problem of their children's schooling, after moving out, especially in the later stage of the child's household registration, it is impossible to go back to inherit the rural homestead, because the homestead is collectively owned, and the last person in the family in the rural area, if there is no more, the homestead will be recovered to the rural collective ownership. <>

But now many rural people are buying houses in the city, as long as you don't move your hukou, it will not affect you to build a house in the countryside, your homestead is still your homestead, no one has the right to deprive you of the house that still belongs to the village, what belongs to you is yours.

But there are many places where he still has a limited purchase order, which means that if you want to buy a house in the city, you must settle in the city, otherwise you can't buy the house in the city you want to be in. In fact, now the country is also vigorously developing rural areas, and many people have given up their rural hukou for the sake of their children.

It's a pity that you have lost your homestead for such reasons, but there is no way to crack the air, the future of the child is also very important, and the parents have far-reaching plans for the son. <>

If the conditions in the home allow, you can buy a house in the city, at least if you want to live in the city in the future, it is more convenient to have a place to stay, as long as the policy allows, you need to know what you care about most? It is also necessary to understand some local policies, because this thing varies slightly according to different regions, and it is roughly the same.

This is not considered a violation, and a farmer's house in the countryside is not counted in the commercial house, so it is also okay to buy a house in the city.

If you have a homestead in the countryside, you can theoretically buy unlimited houses in the city, but many cities have a limited purchase policy. Therefore, under the principle of satisfying the principle of "one house for one household", rural people can go to the city to buy houses, and the houses in the city and the houses in the countryside are not illegal and legal. ”

Farmers buying houses in the city are not considered illegal, and buying a house in the city is buying a commercial house, which has nothing to do with rural homesteads.

1. A rural villager household can only own one homestead, and its area shall not exceed the standard prescribed by the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government. 2. Villagers in rural areas should build houses in strict accordance with the approved area and building standards, and it is forbidden to build without approval and occupy more than the area of the homestead. 3. If the house is built in a different place after approval, the original homestead shall be returned to the village collective in strict accordance with the requirements of "building new and demolishing the old".

4. Rural villagers who apply for homestead land after selling, renting, or donating their houses shall not be approved. 5. For problems such as the excessive area of the historical homestead and the "multiple houses per household", it is necessary to classify the high hardship in accordance with the relevant policies and regulations. 6. In areas where per capita land is small and cannot guarantee that a household owns a homestead, the county-level ** can take measures to read the sedan chair on the basis of fully respecting the wishes of farmers, and ensure that the villagers in the countryside have a place to live in accordance with the standards stipulated by the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government.

In this regard, in order to prevent the land from being illegally built and occupied, the state has introduced a policy of one house per household, that is, each family has only one homestead, and it is no longer possible to build houses at will as before. If there is a need to build a house, it is necessary to go to the relevant housing and urban development department to apply for the purpose of building a house, and also provide relevant materials for Ming Tangerine, and the housing and urban development department must pass the review and approval before construction. Once it is found that the house is built indiscriminately without relevant documents, the ** department will demolish the house and impose a fine.

First, Yu Zhengliang can only have one house per household, second, boys under the age of 18 can only be counted as one household, third, if there are two boys over the age of 18, even if there are two households, fourth, to build a new house, the old house must be demolished, and fifth, to get the permission of ** town transport.

According to the first paragraph of Article 62 of the Land Management Law, "if a rural villager has only one rural homestead, the scope of its housing base shall not exceed the requirements of the provincial, autonomous prefecture or municipal district". Paragraph 4 requires:

Rural villagers** and houses are rented out and then apply for homesteads, which are not permitted. "It can be learned from the Land Management Law that a rural household has only one rural homestead in the village, and the Land Management Law does not require rural households to have conflicts with rural houses after buying houses in cities, nor does it require villagers to have rural homesteads after buying houses in cities, so rural households buying houses in cities is not a violation of the current policy of "one house per household".

Although many villagers have already bought houses in the city, they are still agricultural, so it is not a violation of the current policy of "one house per household" in the village. Houses in the city are commercial and residential buildings, as long as there is money, anyone can buy them, and there is no limit to how many you can buy. Therefore, as long as the people in the village have money and the ability to work, of course, they can also buy houses in the city.

Compared with the commercial buildings in the region, the rural homestead is collective land, and the villagers did not attach importance to the rural homestead before, so they can buy and sell freely, and they can also apply to the villagers' committee for a new rural homestead. However, in recent years, the situation of agricultural land being occupied by rural homesteads has become more and more serious, and in order to avoid more agricultural land being occupied, the current policy of "one household and one house" has been implemented.

The implementation of "one house per household" in rural areas is to protect basic agricultural land and provide security for agriculture. In particular, the just-announced requirement of "eight prohibitions" for self-built houses in rural areas is very well established, and the situation and problems of embezzling farmland to build houses are resolutely resisted. In the past 20 years, the real estate industry has promoted the rapid development of social economy, but it has also produced many problems, such as housing prices and high consumption.

And the situation caused by this is some in the countryside, for example, the situation of self-built houses in the countryside has a hard time maintaining the basic agricultural land. However, the purchase of houses by rural households in the city refers to commercial and residential buildings, which is an individual behavior that improves economic development and stimulates consumption, and needs to be encouraged. In recent years, it has not been said that authoritative experts have encouraged farmers to buy houses in the city, digest and absorb the pressure of the housing market, and improve the urban economy.

A household and a house also has a particularly big advantage is that it can be recycled, if the original rural homestead user dies, the self-built house on the top is merged into the group after the collapse and then used for distribution, but also to ensure that every rural farmer can have a house to live in, compared with the big city, many young people have worked hard for half a lifetime, just to be able to buy that suite, diligent and diligent all their lives just to be able to repay the loan, to Xiao Zhao said, if the city is uncomfortable, why not come back to see, at least there is an area that can shelter you from the wind and rain, So that you won't have to live in your own house with such a big result.

No violations. The nature of the two is different, in the countryside the homestead belongs to the collective, in the city to buy a house belongs to the commercial house.

No violations. The nature of the two is different, and now there is a clear limit on the number of homesteads, which is only for homesteads.

There is no violation, this is in line with the relevant regulations, and many places encourage farmers to buy houses in the city and live in the city.

Owning a house in the countryside and a house in the city does not violate the relevant principle of "one house per household". What we need to know is that this policy is mainly aimed at the principle of rural homesteads, so the tool of constraint is rural homesteads, not urban commercial housing.

According to the provisions of the Land Management Law, the ownership of rural homesteads belongs to the village collectives, and as long as the household registration of the village collectives is obtained, the homestead land of the village collective will be used free of charge, and a house will be built on this basis, but the requirements of only one homestead and one house must be met for each household registration. Now, with the continuous development of the rural economy, many peasants have become wealthy and have purchased real estate in the county and cities, while the rural houses are still preserved.

The policy stipulates that rural homesteads are not allowed to be bought and sold, that is, they cannot enter the market, and there is no environment for going to the countryside to buy land and build houses! And you are a city hukou, and you can't buy a room. In fact, many places now encourage farmers to buy houses in the city, and now our urbanization process is in progress, and many rural people go to the city to buy houses is also in line with the law of development, and now many rural villagers have bought houses in the county and probably in the city.

Because life in the county and the city is relatively convenient after all, and it is also the general trend of future development, the population in the village will be less and less in the future. However, the medical, educational, transportation, and cultural facilities in the county and cities are much better than those in the rural areas, and the general trend in the future will definitely be that more and more people will live in the county and cities. To sum up, "one household and one house" means that a farmer can only have one rural homestead, and there is no need to eat miscellaneous.

In the rural areas, one house per household should be strictly enforced, and those who speculate in houses, those who circle houses, and those who have 2, 3, or even 7 or 8 houses in the cities should not be constrained in the strict implementation of one house per household? How to enshrine the principles of fairness and equality?

How many houses are legal for people in the city, but one house for people in the countryside? Artificially created human ranks! Fairness is hopeless!

It's just that there is nothing to do with farmers, how can you take care of the dozens of rich houses in the city, and see if the housing prices are still high for one household in the city.

If one household and one house in the countryside violates the law, then the county people will not violate the law if they have a few houses, which is not a kind of discrimination.

At present, the rural peasants are still living a poor life, so why don't they give the peasants some development?

You should check the people who have a lot of houses and how they got the houses, this is the right way.

The policy of one household and one house is good, but one household with multiple houses is too wasteful of national land, and there are too many idle houses in rural areas, so the state should take action to deal with it.

The unified method of urban and rural areas implements one house per household, and the penalty for building more must be demolished, so that it is fair.

This is the law of irrationality! The city can have hundreds of sets of house speculation! There is not enough housing in the countryside!

It is for the sake of insurance in the future, and it is reasonable to say that it is a violation, but forced demolition is even more of a rule, which is a problem left over from the system that cannot be solved.

If the people only choose rural housing, give up the commercial housing in the city! Then the country's finances will collapse.

The houses built by farmers are saved little by little, and one house can be supported, but the hope of demolition is reasonable, and it is hoped that the country will give a unified and reasonable demolition, and it is really not easy for farmers.

Does the rich house of the city's shantytown reform count! It's time to stop this kind of wealth-making!

The peasants have reached the point of no return!

One house per household in the countryside. Early in the countryside, the people of the village can buy and sell homesteads. Now it's a house. Is the city a house with one floor?

This kind of thing is not actually a violation, it is very standard.

The houses in the city were bought by laborers with their hard-earned money from developers.

Strictly implement the one-household-one-set system in the city, effectively stop housing prices, effectively stop lawbreakers who make money by speculating in houses, and effectively resist the hot evidence of farmers' eyes.

More than one house in the countryside is considered a violation, and more than one house in the city is called worry.

The source of this policy is: Article 62, Paragraph 1 of the Land Management Law stipulates that a rural villager can only have one homestead per household, and the area of the homestead shall not exceed the norms of the rules of the province, autonomous region and municipality directly under the Central Government. According to the fourth paragraph, if a rural villager sells or rents a house and then applies for a homestead land, it shall not be approved.

Due to historical reasons, there are still many more houses per household. Nowadays, people often talk about the reform policy of one household and one house in the countryside, which is slightly different from the formulation of the land management law. The Land Management Act says that the request for a homestead is one house per household.

Today's change is a measure of change that respects what once constituted a multi-family home. The purpose is to improve the efficiency of the use of land for rural construction, avoid land fees, and strive to make full use of surplus homesteads.

At present, this reform is fundamentally in the stage of mapping and piloting, which is the general direction of homestead management in the future, but there are very few real forced repossession and even fines. After all, it is necessary to respect ideals and ensure stability, that is, this is an advocacy, not a coercive policy of change, and this is a long-term and gradual process.

Since the village homestead is collectively owned, the leading power in this matter lies with the village. In some villages, the surplus homesteads of rural households have been recovered for compensation and factories, stores, hotels, etc., have been built to fully revitalize the application; There are also reclamation of agricultural land, the application of the policy of linking increase and decrease, and the sale of land use indicators for profit. In short, it just doesn't cost the land.

Rural homesteads are generally less approved and accounted for more. As far as the countryside is concerned, this is very normal, because the land originally belonged to the peasants at the time of the land reform, and later became a collective, and the peasants were not given a discount to buy shares when they joined the cooperative, which is equivalent to taking it away for nothing, and later the homestead had to be approved by the county and township. Directed by the consumer team, its use is only to repair housing, as the land is only the right to use, and there is no exchange of mortgages and other functions, generally speaking, the approval of the construction of the point of land is complete and insufficient, the consumer team in the land is only a lot more, farmers are still expanding the point year by year after the construction, some expansion is in the surrounding pioneering, now if the homestead exchange, mortgage, sale right, that must be willing to Chi Qiao to set the norms of individual per capita or per household qingnuke, and then to stop measuring it, more than the local how to do?

I think it is best to issue homestead certificates to farmers according to the current practice of occupying the area of peasant housing. It is better not to allow the choice of retreat, nor to charge fees for over-occupation, so as to respect the ideal and not increase the peasants' contributions.