Is Li Yongle s Math 1 question more difficult than the real questions of the graduate school entranc

660 has some over-the-top questions, if you don't want to do it or the difficulty can be put aside, if you want to be similar to the real exam questions, it is recommended that you first look at the proposition of the cross-examination education teacher Zhang Yu's basic tutoring series, in addition, it is more difficult to review, and then simulate the real questions when it comes to the sprint, otherwise how to get a high score in the real questions? You say no.

Yes, it's really difficult, especially the one with the most difficulty, but it's the best to lay the foundation, and many people use it, including myself, so at first, you will feel uncomfortable so you have to come on. 660 is not easy to say that it is the foundation, but I have studied 80% of the basic questions of this year's exam questions, which are about the same as above, and this is only for the choice of fill-in-the-blank questions. If you still have to grasp the basics, you have to read Li Yongle's review book carefully.

Watch it at least twice! Talking about experience, I hope it will help you, just calm down. I wish you success in your postgraduate entrance examination!

Cyma 74, the diligent person is the master of time, and the lazy person is the slave of time. Someone asked me why I should go to graduate school? Maybe it's small, but I really want to change my fate, review the information gong zhonghao search:

Seven Steps Online Lessons".I spend the least amount of time in the subject of politics.,Outline analysis to deal with multiple-choice questions feels enough.,The knowledge points are very complete.,There's a part of the timeline to memorize or something, I made up a slip and limerick.,If you have time, you can take a look at Xiaocao.,It's also a very concise book.,Basically no nonsense.,It's also very recommended.。

Each teacher's books have their own merits.

First of all, Mr. Li Yongle's practice book is 660, which mainly includes choice and fill in the blanks, and is arranged in the order of advanced mathematics, linear algebra, probability theory and mathematical statistics.

Secondly, Mr. Tang Jiafeng's 1800 is mainly arranged according to the difficulty of the questions, which mainly includes choice, filling in the blanks and answering questions, which is suitable for the basic stage of postgraduate examination review.

You can go to the market and look through it and buy it according to your wishes, but no matter which book you make, you must understand and understand it thoroughly.

calf 23, the prime of life will not come again, it is difficult to make a day and then the morning, timely encouragement, the years do not treat others. Tao Yuanming's struggle is indeed not easy on the road, but the dawn is ahead, the information is here, Gong Zhong search: "Seven steps online class".

..Find your own special place to review (the advantage of finding a research friend is that two people are embarrassed to be lazy, and they will study when the time comes; The advantage of not looking for a research friend is that you are more free, you can control your own time, and you will not be disturbed by your own pace. It's up to you to decide).

I haven't done Li Yongle's book, but briefly talk about Tang Jiafeng's 18001, which has many topics. It's really a lot, under normal circumstances, I start preparing for the exam in May and June, if I do 1800, the time is a little too late, and it is a waste of time and a little bit unfinishable.

2. High repetition rate of questions. It's not that there are the same topics, but that there are more than ten or twenty questions about the same knowledge point, and the focus of doing the questions is to grasp the routine, and it is not very meaningful to do too much, and the postgraduate entrance examination should focus on efficiency.

In my humble opinion, don't raise the bar...

I still have a few days to take the test, take a small time to talk to you, the essence of the sea of questions tactics is that you first understand the knowledge, when you need to use a certain knowledge point, you can immediately think of and use it correctly, otherwise I can guarantee that you will forget those questions, you must make the meaning of each knowledge point very clear, otherwise, in the end, you will do the real question, you are still blind. As for which teacher's book you said, it's not a big problem, I'm with Zhang Yu, you can refer to their lecture style and then decide.

Li Yongle's high mathematics, and a linear algebra are a must-see, especially linear algebra, and the basic question type line algebra is in it.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary, a whole book is enough, Tang Jiafeng's talk is detailed, but there are too many questions, if you don't understand it, it's all in vain.

The Tangshen 1800 is worth doing all over again.

Li Yongle 660 is a bit difficult, and it can be done in the middle and late stages.

Linear algebra with Yongle the Great).

Someone has told you that if you finish the whole book, you can use any of the exercise questions, and the key is the real questions for the graduate school entrance examination. Recommend Zhang Yu's real question solution. Doing the real questions thoroughly is the king. Workbooks only broaden your horizons and increase your proficiency.

I have passed the past questions twice in 32 years, done thoroughly, and the postgraduate entrance examination is guaranteed to be at least 130+

Let me tell you about it: I was admitted to graduate school in mathematics 141 when I was in graduate school, and the whole book I used to review the graduate school entrance examination at that time was Shuangli's book, and the difficulty made you doubt life, because of the high difficulty, there will be no more problems in the later review, and the questions in the male will not exceed the difficulty of that book. I don't know much about the 1800 of the sugar ah edge, it seems to be simple (basic) in three stages, consolidation, and elevation.

Haven't done it, seen it. It doesn't have much to do with the choice of books, the main thing is that you can study any book thoroughly, then you will be fine. The amount of knowledge is enough, and then the appropriate amount of questions, plus the real questions, will be on 130 casually

Li Yongle's 660 is actually good, and every question is very attentive.

Tang Jiafeng's is better, all questions are divided into question types.

Just do the question, the latter is better.

If you have good ability, it is recommended that Zhang Yu's 1000 questions.

No matter which one is done well, the key is to master and review.

It's good to buy a whole book and do it, it's actually pretty much the same.

You can choose which one to say, you can take a look first.

It's really hard to say how many percent this is, but 10 percent.

Anyway, 400 questions are indeed more difficult than real questions.

Give yourself a score in the process of doing it, and see how many points you can get, more than 100 points are very good, and the questions in it are done several times, which is very classic.

It's more difficult than the real questions in the graduate school entrance examination, but there are a lot of summaries, which is good for review. If you want to get a high score, you need to have this kind of inductive book. Personally, I think it's better to look at Li Yongle's real questions.

Judging from my experience in reviewing for graduate school entrance examinations, Er Li's book is easier than the real questions, and Chen Wendeng's mathematics is difficult.

In fact, there is no so-called order of doing questions, but (according to my own feelings), the knowledge points in the 660 questions are not easy to grasp after reading the book. The knowledge points of the 660 questions are more comprehensive, and there are very few questions (although only the choice to fill in the blanks) only one knowledge point is tested, so I feel that after reading a chapter of the "Whole Book", do a chapter of "660 Questions" in the choice to fill in the blanks (it is written in the order of the chapters, it is easy to divide the chapters by yourself), although you will still encounter questions that will not be known, but you can consolidate the knowledge points summarized in the "Quanshu" better, and it will also help to master some methods in the "Quanshu".

Achieving 135 points is no easy task, and it is the way to go by integrating the textbook. However, few people have the patience to fully understand advanced mathematics, line generation, and generalization, so everything is done for the sake of taking the test. The books I made at that time were basically Li Yongle's, and the books were very good.

I don't know what your current level is, but just relying on "The Whole Book" + "Basic Pass 660 Questions" + real questions, without fully understanding the ins and outs of each theorem, it is not realistic to take the 135+ test. To achieve a high score, you must strengthen your test-taking skills. Li Yongle has a book of "100 Questions", all of which are big questions, with a certain degree of difficulty, and it is difficult to say how similar it is to the real questions, but it can be used to practice and practice hands, and see more about the methods and angles of solving questions.

In the college entrance examination, "special topics" are often used to explain, so Li Yongle's "135 Points" is still somewhat enlightening to look at in the sprint stage. It is necessary to repeat the past questions, but it is also necessary to have a certain amount of mock questions. Li Yongle's "400 Questions" is used by many people, but this set of questions is more difficult, a little higher than the average difficulty of postgraduate mathematics in recent years, mainly used to check and fill in the gaps, and practice the time to do the questions.

It's also good to have a booklet of formulas for graduate school mathematics, and it's easy to remember the formulas if you have nothing to do, and some methods of area division and line integration are easy to remember. It's not good to recommend someone else's book if it's not used.

Books are still ancillary, it is difficult to say that the topic is pressed, in fact, the changes of these books are very small every year, even if they are like "400 Questions", the annual change will not exceed 50%. Therefore, some of the knowledge points and some topics in Li's book may be relatively old, and superstitious books are useless. If you want to improve your test-taking level, you still have to rely on your own summary, accumulate experience in doing questions, and turn other people's summaries into your own things in the process of doing questions, so that it is possible to get a high score in the examination room.

We are opposed to the tactics of the sea of questions, but the fantasy of the textbook can only be on paper. To choose a topic, you should still choose some high-quality ones, and don't be led astray by some low-quality exercise sets. Based on a certain amount of exercises + repeated practice of past questions + self-summary, I believe you will get a high score!

The real questions have only been used by Li Yongle, which are classified and summarized, and there are also sets of questions in the front, and the back is the classified answers, which can be used as a topic, which is more convenient.

Good luck!

Note that there is a fundamental difference between the two books!! It wouldn't be redundant if there were about two copies!

I've done both of them, so as a rule of thumb: I will review the whole book first, although the book is thick, but I will do 20 pages a day, it will take about 4 hours, and it will not take a few months, and I can definitely complete it. Review the whole book is basic, there are formulas to explain, there are exercises, this is not enough to do once, it is best to do a few more sides, pay special attention to the first time you did not make the topic, to know why you did not make it, is it not thought of the idea of the topic or carelessly did not count correctly, if you do not think of the idea, you know, what information you see in the future, what ideas to think of.

Personally, I think Li Yongle's review book is relatively simple, or you can try Chen Wendeng's review book. The problem is not to do more, but to master the knowledge and know your weaknesses. Before September, I recommend that you read every question in the book.

Let's talk about the foundation 660That book is all about choosing to fill in the blanks, and it must be done after the "Whole Book", because it is all about 15 years of national and school exam questions! (In the early years, the school was self-proposing) is relatively difficult to write than the "Complete Book".

It's best to do this 2 to 3 times as well. Get it done in September to October. It says that it is "Basic 660 Questions", but it is based on the choice to fill in the blanks, but often the multiple-choice questions are more active over the years, and they do not necessarily have much foundation, and they are also the places where points are lost and gaps are widened.

In November, buy a book of past past papers, which are the fundamentals. From '98, it was conducted in the form of a mock exam, and a paper was completed in 2 days. After that, I have to review the questions that I didn't do well from time to time. In the sprint stage in January, do a few sets of mock questions to practice your feelings.

I'm only 130 in math, and I hope you can do better than me to reach your own goals

I feel pretty much the same. There are a lot of these three books, and the others are pretty much the same. I'm also preparing, and I'm listening to what my brother said. Reference.