Interesting facts about legal knowledge, interesting questions about legal knowledge

Law-abiding stories: The watermelon brothers.

In Lilou Village, there are two brothers surnamed Li, who each plant a good watermelon every year. Because within a radius of one or twenty miles, only these two brothers grow watermelons, everyone calls them "watermelon brothers". The land of the watermelon boss is on the side of the east road of the village, and the land of the second watermelon is on the side of the road in the southwest of the village.

Although there was a lot of rain this year, their melon fields were high, and the watermelons still grew big and sweet.

When the melon was just ripe, a team of Chiang Kai-shek's security regiment came over to the east of the village, and as soon as these hungry wolves saw the boss's melon, they immediately grabbed me, and after a while, there was no watermelon left in more than one acre, leaving only a piece of rotten melon vine and melon leaves and leftover melon peels and melon seeds in the field.

After more than 20 days in these security regiments, the Eighth Route Army suddenly came to the village, and coincidentally, this time the Eighth Route Army walked by the melon field of the second child in the southwest of the village. "I'm done with this melon field! The second watermelon thought:

I don't want my life, I'll hide in the melon field and watch his Eighth Route Army pick my melons. The second watermelon sat down under the watermelon shed in frustration and watched the Eighth Route Army coming. Who knows how many troops there are?

You can't see the tail to the north. "This watermelon grows well! The lead soldier said.

And three white melons wow! "I'm afraid that this melon will weigh thirty pounds. "Eat two to quench your thirst."

The soldiers passing by, you and I are more than amazed.

Hearing the Eighth Route Army say that the watermelon is good, the second watermelon's heart hurts like a knife. But he was strange, these people were done talking, and they didn't even stop their feet, and they walked forward with all their strength. The second watermelon turned his head to the west and looked at it, and he couldn't see the head of the team or the tail of the team, so he said to himself

This Eighth Route Army is weird! As he spoke, he stood up, carried a melon knife, ran to the ground and picked up a big watermelon, put it on the side of the road, and cut it with a "thorn". "Eat watermelon, brethren!

The second watermelon called to the Eighth Route Army, but no one answered him. "I'm thirsty when I walk, come and eat a melon! The second watermelon shouted to the other soldiers, but they were all :

Thank you, fellow! I don't eat it. This time, the second watermelon was in a hurry and shouted loudly:

Look at why don't you eat the watermelon cut open in the Eighth Route Army! At this time, a 16-year-old trumpeter asked him: "Fellow!

How much does this watermelon cost? "Don't want money, just eat as much as you want!" The second watermelon said as he picked up the melon and sent it to the little trumpeter, who said again and again

I don't eat, I don't eat! "The feet kept moving forward. The second watermelon was holding the melon, standing by the watermelon field in a daze, and the team still walked forward side by side, with no head in front and no tail in the back.

Louisiana law states that biting with real teeth is a "simple act of aggression"; However, if a person bites with a full mouth of dentures, the crime will be increased to a "serious assault".

The town of Lakefee, Ontario, Canada, stipulates that all birds can sing for 30 minutes during the day and only 15 minutes at night.

A little boy, who had no money to access the Internet, snatched the mobile phone of a woman who was off the night shift in a place without street lights on a dark night, hurried home, and found that the mobile phone belonged to his mother. Ha ha!

How old is the child?

The General Principles of the Civil Law stipulate that a civil subject under the age of 10 is a non-civil actor, so it is not legally responsible for its actions and its guardian bears it.

The General Principles of Civil Law stipulate that a citizen has civil rights from birth, i.e. a breathing infant who is completely separated from the mother's body, and whose rights are exercised by the citizen's guardian when he or she is unable to exercise them.

The other child's crime is a tort in the civil law, and your tying of the child without causing injury to the child is a violation of the personal rights of citizens in the civil law (there is no subjective element of the crime and causing harm, so it does not involve criminal law).

The above is the analysis of the legal solution:1The child pays for the damage to the door.

2.You write a review and negotiate between the parties on whether the child suffers damages, both physical and mental.

From real life, it is better to solve it in harmony and turn big things into small ones.

As for the parents who say that they want to use violence, you can tell them that it will lead to a violation of the criminal law (because you have already gone to the police station to request arbitration, that is, it has legal effect) and that you need to be criminally responsible (there are subjective and objective elements to constitute a crime).

Hope the above is helpful to you!

Hello: It's very simple. Don't overthink it.

1 The principle is that each party is responsible for its own mistakes.

2 If the other party breaks the door, he should pay compensation. The other party is rude to your uncle and uncle, and you should apologize.

3 You, it's wrong to detain a child, it's enough to apologize. No money should be lost. First, there is no property loss on the other side; Second, there was no personal injury; Third, there is no solatium for mental loss. So, you don't have to lose money.

4 As for the review, the police lack legal knowledge, so let him go. It has a little, very little effect on you.

5 Look at it this way, have you lost?

1. As far as your behavior of tying up a child is concerned, what you did was indeed wrong, and the police station is still right to deal with you, and you should actively cooperate as well. However, your actions do not constitute illegal detention, but are only ordinary civil disputes, and if you think that the police station has handled it unfairly, you can reject their handling opinions.

2, the child's parents still want to beat your uncle violently and push your uncle with their hands and feet. You can ask the police station to handle it as well.

3, For there is a father, there is a son. Such naughty children are only educated by their parents, so I think that in this matter, you are currently patient and let them, they feel that they have been cheapened, and they will not learn from it and change the way they educate their children, and when they realize that the child cannot be disciplined, they will feel that it is too late, and the child is not far from going to prison.

4. It is recommended not to be knowledgeable with such a person, such a parent himself is not educated, let alone his children!

The child comes and breaks down the door of your house, is destroying the property, and you can ask his guardian for compensation. You tied the child's hands for nearly one hour, which is an infringement of personal freedom, and you are suspected of illegal detention, even if you did not hurt the child, if you continue to do so, it is the crime of illegal detention. The police station asks you to accompany him with money (maybe compensation for mental damages) + write a review, which is a lenient treatment for you.

Governing the law stipulates; unlawfully restricting the physical liberty of others is to be detained for between 10 and 15 days and fined between 500 and 1,000 RMB; where the circumstances are more minor, they are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days and fined between 200 and 500 RMB

It is not a matter of resigning one's fate, but it is the result of your excesses, and it should be taken as a warning.

For the first time, it's not right for you to tie that child's hand, to unlawfully restrict someone's personal freedom, but he broke down the door of your house.

You can claim civil damages, and you can also claim damages if you have caused harm to your side in the course of the use of force.

LZ must remember that next time you must not be so impulsive, the crime of illegally restricting the personal freedom of others is not light, and you will be held criminally responsible.

You are not unlawful detention, unlawful detention is the holding of hostages for 24 hours. Previously, it was the child's fault, you can ask his family for compensation, but if you help the child's hand, you must enter the bureau, you need to apologize and compensate, if you insist on not apologizing and compensating, you may face detention.

You have a weak sense of the law, and you will get angry with children, which is a bit immature.

In civil disputes, it is good to be reasonable, and there is no need for any legal provisions. Even if you make trouble at the police station, it's okay According to Article 238 of the Criminal Law, the duration of illegal detention lasting more than 24 hours constitutes the standard for filing a case.

Unlawful restraint of another person is subject to criminal liability.

You are a general civil dispute that is easy to resolve, and you can't be illegally confined as long as you tie up your child's hands for a certain amount of time. You also mentioned that the other party threatened you, and you can explain the situation to the police station. The best outcome is mediation between the parties.

It's not right for you to tie a child's hand, to restrict someone's freedom, or to detain someone unlawfully, and he will break down your door and make his family lose money.

It's definitely not right for you to do that.

Interesting? You call this fun.

Because it is a traffic accident that causes death, the classification is set as a major accident: it refers to an accident that causes the death of 1 to 2 people, or seriously injures more than 3 people and less than 10 people, or the property loss is between 30,000 yuan and 60,000 yuan;

In the case of a major accident, it is sufficient for the public procuratorate and judicial department to file a lawsuit against the perpetrator, and the victim's family may not hire a lawyer, and the public procuratorate and judicial department may provide assistance and provide relevant evidence.

Is it a verdict that the poor man deserves?

Money is weird, but it's not so weird as it is.

The court still hears the case mainly on evidence, and if there is evidence that can prove the illegal acts of the other party, the court will still hear the case notarily.

Lawyer Cao Chunlei.

You're exaggerating the lawyer's abilities.