The man was killed while attending a class reunion, and all 27 people were found responsible, how ca

Don't discourage alcohol at dinners, don't pour alcohol, discourage others from drinking too much alcohol when appropriate, and find a substitute driver for someone if they are drunk or take him home in person.

Safe dining means that you should not be persuaded to drink indiscriminately, and if others can't drink or have a physical illness, you can't force others to drink, otherwise you will be responsible.

The premise of safe dining is that everyone drinks as little as possible, and do not persuade others to drink at the wine table, because everyone at the table is also responsible.

I believe that if you are unwell, you must be taken to the hospital in time to be able to do a good job of resuscitation.

Preface: When friends and family have dinner together, it is inevitable that they will drink some wine. In Jiangxi, a man died of drinking alcohol after a dinner, and the family of the deceased sued the projector in court, demanding more than 1 million yuan in compensation.

When everyone sees such news, they will feel very scary, is it necessary to be responsible for just drinking with others? I don't think this is reasonable, but we also have to judge it according to the actual situation. <>

I believe that when you see such news, you will be curious about how the local judge decided. According to the court, citizens have the right to life and health, and if they need to fulfill the obligation to remind when drinking together. In this incident, because the people who drank together did not remind Peng to drink less.

Therefore, it is necessary to take the initiative to bear civil liability, considering the degree of fault of both parties, and the drinkers at the same table shall jointly bear 30% of the compensation liability according to the size of their respective fault liability. When drinking, you must make a reasonable estimate of your physical condition. <>

If you like to watch the news, you must be very aware of the increase in compensation cases caused by the act of drinking together. Under normal circumstances, this compensation should be borne by the parties themselves, because their own physical condition is only known to themselves, and it is difficult for others to make any judgments from it. However, there are also cases where you need to bear certain responsibilities.

If you know that someone else can't drink alcohol, you are responsible for this behavior. If you are not discouraged from driving under the influence of alcohol and taking a shower, you will end up in a traffic accident, and the person who drinks with you will also be held responsible. <>

I believe that everyone knows their physical condition best, and if this kind of behavior is borne by the same person who drinks, it doesn't seem particularly reasonable, because Iwaki is a gathering of friends and wants to drink and chat happily together. We must drink alcohol according to our actual situation, and if we can't drink, don't force ourselves.

This move is unreasonable and illegal, because they are just ordinary friends, and they don't say how much wine this man drank in the cherry blossom shed, I don't think the family should ask for this.

This move is actually quite legal, mainly because everyone drinks at a table, and one person actually slaps him to death. This kind of thing doesn't usually happen at a wine table. But the attacker is Heng Slippery, and if he dies, he should be inseparable from everyone at the wine table.

It's unreasonable, and it's very unlawful. You should find out why your husband died. This should not be done.

Don't pay a penny to the drunkard's family, the drunkard loves to drink, so eat the fruit you brew yourself.

No relationship with any other person.

1. Is the owner of the car responsible for the death of the borrowed car?

The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "when the owner and user of a motor vehicle are not the same person due to leasing, borrowing, etc., and the liability of the motor vehicle party after a traffic accident occurs, the insurance company shall compensate within the limit of liability of the compulsory insurance of the motor vehicle." For the insufficient part, the user of the motor vehicle shall be liable for compensation; If the owner of the motor vehicle is at fault for the occurrence of the damage, he shall bear the corresponding liability for compensation. ”

Accordingly, to determine whether the vehicle owner is responsible, it depends on whether the vehicle owner is at fault for the occurrence of the damage, such as leaving the vehicle to be driven by a person without a driver's license, knowing that the vehicle is defective and may cause damage to others. If there is a fault, the corresponding liability shall be borne in accordance with the above-mentioned legal provisions, otherwise, no compensation shall be required.

2. If the vehicle that chased the accident was not forced to stop, should the vehicle itself be compensated for the accident?

According to the relevant provisions of China's Road Traffic Safety Law, if an electric vehicle finds an electric tricycle causing an accident, the correct way is to remember the license plate number or remember the shape of the electric tricycle, and immediately call the police for processing. The practice of electric vehicles chasing electric tricycles to stop is not advisable and is not supported by law. As for the practice of electric vehicles, their behavior does not comply with the provisions of the law, and they are liable for certain civil damages.

3. If you die of drunkenness at a dinner party, will the people at the same table be liable for compensation?

The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if the parties are not at fault for causing damages, the parties may share the civil liability according to the actual situation. That is, even if you are not at fault and someone at the table dies drunk, you have to lose money and share the loss.

First: Don't persuade others to drink, don't toast, and keep valid evidence that you didn't persuade to drink, including recording the whole process, taking pictures of your own ** and ** that you didn't drink, to prove that you didn't drink and didn't persuade you to drink.

Second: Repeatedly persuade the people at the same table not to drink, at least 3 times, and keep valid evidence, such as recordings, finding witnesses, special emphasis, etc.

Third: Deliver the drunk person home safely and hand it over to his family and tell him to take proper care. In this process, try to retain evidence, such as recordings and finding one or two people at the same table as witnesses.

Fourth: If a drunk person does something that may be dangerous, discourage him in time, such as not letting him ride a bicycle or going home alone, and keep evidence to prove that he has indeed done his "best of his duty".

Only by doing the above 4 can the people at the same table be completely exempted from responsibility, otherwise even if you don't drink and don't persuade you to drink, you can't tell your innocence and can't get out of the matter.

In Hunan, there is a man who has dinner with everyone, and then he died because of drinking, in fact, drinking at the table should become a particularly common social etiquette, because everyone eats and drinks small wine, which can also make the atmosphere more active, but everyone's tolerance is definitely different, so I think it is necessary to control the amount of alcohol.

There may be a situation at the dinner table, when drinking to a particularly happy time, some people especially like to persuade others to drink, so that in fact, others are not easy to refuse, but it is true that they can't drink, if they refuse, they may lose that person's face, but if they don't refuse, their bodies will be uncomfortable.

And at that time, the man who died of overdose was invited to a dinner in a person's house, after drinking, in fact, this person may have some drunken state, and he was also sent to a restaurant to rest, at that time, there was still a person next to take care of it, and when he found an abnormality, he immediately dialed 120, but it was very unfortunate that after 120 came to first aid, he still did not rescue it, after identification, The deceased was due to the fact that the trachea was filled with a large number of figures, which indicates that the messenger had vomited before his death, and it is very likely that the vomit entered the airway and caused obstruction and suffocation.

And this court judgment is also because the deceased was drinking by himself, and after his body was already drunk, he did not stop drinking, so this situation actually needs to bear this responsibility, and finally the law also considers that both parties are at fault, and then will judge that the people who drank together according to the size of the responsibility, and then need to bear the 30% compensation liability, of course, the deceased's family feels that the 6 people who drank at this table should bear full responsibility, Therefore, the appeal was filed again, but it was rejected by the court.

I think the most important thing is that you should know that you don't let your body test your alcohol consumption, and you should know best how much you drink.

If there is such a compulsive persuasion at a table, and there is a person who knows that others can't drink, but still keeps letting others drink, or a drunk person goes to drive after drinking, and then exercises vigorously, and the person at the same table does not stop these situations, then he will be held responsible, and if someone is drunk and has no way to control his behavior, as a drinking friend at the table, he has a duty of guardianship, and must send the drunk person to the hospital or home.

Yes, they have an obligation to persuade men not to drink so much, and they have an obligation to send men who drink too much home.

Yes, there must be accountability. Because I have a clear relationship with these people, I may end up going to the police station to make a corresponding oral record and transcript.

It is definitely necessary to be responsible, and at this time, you may go to the public security bureau to do a corresponding investigation, and you may even issue a certificate.

Summary. The deceased themselves generally account for 30 to 50 per cent of the responsibility.

Drunk to death at a dinner party, do you need to be responsible for the meal?

Please eat at one table, but drunk and die at another.

It was us who passed away at 2 o'clock after leaving the hotel.

This is also subject to a certain amount of liability.

During the period, there was no persuasion to pour wine, etc., before the guest left, he also asked the colleague who left later to take him home, and more than 1 hour later, the colleague sent him to the hotel, accompanied by a person.

The staff of the hotel and the hotel have repeatedly reminded the colleagues who were with him to send him to the hospital to sober up, and the colleagues all said that this person would be fine every time he drank too much and slept well, and was not sent to the hospital.

Where there is no act of persuasion to drink, and there is a safe return home, it may be claimed not to be responsible.

The colleagues in the back did not send him home, but sent him to the hotel.

When it was close to 2 o'clock, the colleague who accompanied him found that he was not breathing, and he called 120 but did not come back.

This still needs to bear a certain amount of civil liability.

What percentage is the general situation.

Description: Just the guest party, different tables, no persuasion to drink, before leaving, there are a few colleagues to go home together.

This is subject to liability.

How much responsibility does the deceased have for himself?

The deceased themselves generally account for 30 to 50 per cent of the responsibility.

1. The class reunion was killed, and all 27 people were sentenced to responsibility

Many people have participated in class reunions, in the reunion classmates recall the past, talk about the future, can not avoid drinking during the banquet, but drinking should also be moderate, some people like to persuade drinking, this is not a thing.

According to reports, Zhang attended the annual class reunion, during which the classmates were advised to drink, knowing that he was going to drive back, or persuaded to drink, Zhang drove home alone, had a car accident, and died after rescue efforts.

After the incident, Zhang's family sued 27 party participants, six classmates each paid 5,250 yuan in compensation, and 21 students each paid 3,150 yuan in compensation, which I think is reasonable.

2. My opinion on this matter

I think it's reasonable to deal with the results of this treatment. This classmate went to a party and drove home alone after drinking, and the other classmates should have stopped it, and they didn't stop it, which caused the consequences.

The party members have the obligation to remind, admonish, take care of, and help the drunk driving classmate, but they have not fulfilled this obligation, so they should pay for their wrongdoing, and they should be liable for compensation.

3. Knowledge about alcohol persuasion

The first is compulsive persuasion, knowing that the other party cannot drink, or knowing that the other party is sick ——— the other party has clearly stated that the other party is unwell, but still persuades the other party to drink, and bears all the responsibilities caused by the persuasion;

The second is knowing that the other party has lost or is about to lose the ability to control himself when he is drunk, and there is a danger when no one takes care of him, and the sober drinker fails to deliver the drunk person safely, and the drunk person will bear the corresponding responsibility once the accident occurs;

4. Cherish friendship, treat friends well, and advise friends not to drink excessively

Friends are the wealth around us, so we have to be kind to friends, the party is a very beautiful thing, how much wine can be drunk in the party, should not be persuaded to drink, if there is an accident because of the persuasion of alcohol, it will be a lifetime of unease, cherish friends, treat friends well, and drink in moderation.

Reasonable, they did not fulfill the co-drinker's duty of reasonable safety care and corresponding specific obligations such as care and protection, and should be liable for compensation for Zhang's death.

I think it's reasonable that this classmate went to a party and drove home alone after drinking, and the other classmates should have stopped it, and they didn't stop it, and in the end, it caused this kind of consequence.

I think this result is very reasonable, because the class reunion is voluntary and not forced.

I think this result is very reasonable, after all, everyone is a participant in the class reunion, and as long as they participate in eating, drinking, and drinking, they should be responsible for the deceased.