If a mother abandons her child, should her child resent the mother when she becomes an adult?

Will a mother abandon her child so brightly, there was once a saying that tiger poison does not eat children. This is very easy to understand, that is, the tiger is very vicious, but it will never eat its own children, so you are the mother here, will you abandon the child? I think there will definitely not be more, and neither will the parents, maybe the reality you see will have some people who feel that he has abandoned his child, but maybe he is forced to be helpless at this time, and he has chosen the current situation and heart of him that you see, he will never abandon it.

Man is selfish. When people's self-interest is affected, they often choose the aspect that is most beneficial to themselves. Therefore, the mother didn't want her child to drag herself down, she knew that she was still young and could remarry.

So, the mother chooses her own interests and forgets her responsibilities as the mother of her children.

Lack of responsibility and morality.

Man is a strange creature who can be "accidentally" broken by his previous principles when he loves this home the most, or he can be trapped in this "cage" called home for the rest of his life.

Because people often care about themselves the most, and they are the easiest to ignore themselves. When a woman has put too much effort into her family, and suddenly the pillar of the family falls, what can she do? She has already given that home in the first half of her life, can't she keep it for herself in the second half of her life?

From the child's point of view, it is "abandoning his own child", "sorry" for his own child, and not letting the child have maternal love.

Sometimes we really don't know how low the bottom line is.

In front of her own happiness and the happiness of her children, her happiness becomes the pain of her children. But that person, or Jing Bang He, can have the hardships that his children don't understand, or he may really have no conscience, and he really doesn't want to be "morally kidnapped". Who prescribes that parents must sacrifice everything for their children?

Who said that to raise a child, you must be widowed for your father? Does it have to be a person who is fortunate to pull the child to grow up? She doesn't want to be cumbersome, can't she?

She really doesn't have the ability to do it herself, so why not let her children be abandoned and raised by the state? If the child had not been abandoned, no one knew if the child would have complained to her mother for "giving birth to such a family" when she grew up? Will she feel that her mother is useless, or even that she will always have children abuse her mother?

Why not let yourself go at the beginning and let the children blame their parents?

We don't know the whole picture of what happened, who knows what the parties think and why?

Don't persuade others to do good deeds without suffering them.

Only personal views are different, don't like it)

Summary. Kiss, such a mother is incompetent, her own flesh and blood can be ruthlessly abandoned, let alone others, oh this is irresponsible behavior, such a mother will not have a good life <>

<> mothers who abandon their children.

Kiss, such a mother is incompetent, her own flesh and blood can be ruthlessly abandoned, let alone others, oh this is irresponsible behavior, such a mother will not have a good life <>

<> kiss Xiaobai has read a sentence! Parents who are focused on their own physical and emotional upbringing have a clear message to their children: "It doesn't matter how you feel, it's just me." ”

Children also have the right to be children. They have the right to play around and behave as they pleases in childhood, and they don't have to worry about being blamed for it. Of course, as the children get older, parents will also let them share some of the household chores and take on some of the responsibilities, but these must not come at the expense of childhood.