Netizens instigated Internet celebrities to commit suicide by drinking medicine, is this behavior le

Netizens instigated Internet celebrities to commit suicide by drinking medicine, and netizens' behavior is not legal and may be criminally responsible. It is reported that my country's law stipulates that even in the live broadcast room, if the remarks of netizens directly lead to the suicide of the live blogger, then it will be characterized as intentional homicide! We all know that intentional homicide is a criminal offense and the sentence is probably more than ten years.

If the comments of netizens belong to the auxiliary rendering of anger, and the broadcaster did not commit suicide because of netizens, then this kind of behavior is also illegal, even if it does not constitute a criminal offense, it also violates my country's "Public Security Administration Regulations", if the family of the Internet celebrity who committed suicide is investigated, the netizen will be administratively detained.

It should be noted that whether it is criminal liability or administrative liability, there will be civil liability, which is obvious! Therefore, you must be cautious when watching the live broadcast, and don't think that there are many people, and some radical language is nothing! Once the law is touched, no matter how many messages you leave a message, even if you look for a needle in a haystack, ** will find you!

Analyse. Let's analyze the suicide of Luo Kitten Maozi, it can be said that Luo Kitten Maozi's suicide was first mentioned by herself! And she took out the pesticide herself and said that she wanted to drink it, and it would be indefinite in the future.

Therefore, Luo Kitten's suicide, she was subjective first, and netizens coaxed later, it can be said that the behavior of netizens belongs to exaggerating the atmosphere, not the main reason for her suicide! In this way, there is a high probability that netizens will be held accountable for administrative responsibility and civil liability, and if a group of netizens are involved in this matter, it is time to be mentally prepared if they have inappropriate remarks! After all, Luo Kitten's family said that they would investigate this matter to the end, and it would definitely not be over!

Civil Liability. So, in this kind of case, what is the general amount of civil liability! Generally speaking, in this kind of case, the civil liability will be around 500,000, which means that the netizens who are coaxing may have to share these compensations equally!

Now you can see the price of inappropriate speech! So don't be reckless!

Netizens instigated Internet celebrities to commit suicide by drinking medicine, and of course this behavior of netizens is not legal!

This behavior of netizens should be illegal, and if this Internet celebrity drinks medicine and dies, all these netizens will not be able to escape the punishment of the law.

It is not legal, this situation is a very serious situation, and netizens need to bear part of the responsibility, and the behavior of netizens has violated the legal boundaries.

It is illegal, such an act is illegal, it is a crime of instigating others, and such people should be arrested for criticism and education.

This behavior of netizens is definitely illegal, and it should not be treated like this, it feels particularly incorrect. Now the man has lost his life.

Of course, you need to take responsibility, no matter what, you shouldn't encourage others to commit suicide, this is very selfish, and you can't let others die for the sake of some excitement.

Of course, you need to take responsibility, these netizens are very selfish, and they also instigated Internet celebrities to commit suicide for the sake of the so-called excitement, and these netizens are also responsible.

There is a need to take responsibility. It can be said that it is particularly incorrect, and such an instigation should not occur.

We must learn to take precautions if we cannot hold them accountable, because if we say it casually, it will have an impact on others, so we must be cautious in our words and actions.

The deceased can be held legally responsible for the heckler, because the heckler has already constituted the crime of indirect homicide.

It should be possible, but the instigator should indeed bear part of the legal responsibility, and is not aware of the danger at all.