What is the impact on the Earth when 300 objects in space are out of orbit?

Updated on science 2024-08-04
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    300 objects have been out of orbit, then there will definitely be an impact on the earth, these objects go out of orbit after going to **, if they go to the earth, it will cause a special harm to the earth.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    If 300 objects in space were to go out of orbit, it would be fatal to the Earth, which is within the solar system.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Three hundred objects are out of orbit, and they will definitely have a certain impact on the earth, and these objects will go out of orbit to the end, and they may also come to the earth and cause harm to human beings.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    When astronauts go to space, they are no longer affected by the earth, and astronauts are equivalent to having no connection with the earth.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    There is no gravity in space, and the Earth's gravity does not work in space and is not affected by gravity.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Yes, for example, astronauts on the space station orbit the Earth at most, which is affected by the Earth's gravity.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The universe is composed of many galaxies, the Milky Way is one of them, the Sun is an ordinary star in the Milky Way, and the Earth is an ordinary member of the Solar System; Because space is the space of the universe, the earth is a part of space

    So the answer is: no; The Earth is part of space

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I don't think it's possible for astronauts to hide in the spacecraft to avoid danger, because the impact is still very strong, and it may blow up the spacecraft.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It should be possible, but the risk is very difficult, after all, the spacecraft also needs time to dock with the space station, and it is difficult to say if the intelligent system of the space station is seriously damaged.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Yes, because the spacecraft can adjust its position to avoid this disaster, and it is dangerous for astronauts to work in the sky.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    OK. The inside is particularly safe, and the design inside has been designed a long time ago, so you can see that the current scientists are very smart.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    First of all, it should be clear that satellites or space junk rely on gravitational force to circle the sky at high speed, and centrifugal force is equal to gravity.

    The thin atmosphere of outer space or other factors can slow down the object, reduce the centrifugal force, and then the object will get closer and closer to the Earth, eventually burning up or crashing into the ocean. The reason why human-controlled vehicles such as satellites do not fall off is because they have their own small engines, which replenish their speed from time to time to get them back to their original orbits.

    And the garbage does not have this treatment, so it slowly gets lower and lower until it burns out. So there can't be anything lingering in space forever. Of course, the very high level of space junk has little resistance, so this downward trend is very unnoticeable.

    In other words, in a hundred thousand years, all the space junk will fall into the atmosphere and burn up.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Space junk is relatively lightweight, at first in a floating state, and eventually will be affected by the earth's gravity to fly to the earth, and burn up when passing through the atmosphere, the relative weight of the satellite is large, and after losing power, it is quickly transported to the earth by the earth's gravity.

  14. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It can reduce the launch of satellites, and also pull back all the satellites that failed to launch, so as to reduce the generation of space junk.

  15. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    We must continue to improve science and technology, try our best to infiltrate lead, do not launch satellites with a relatively short lifespan, and choose satellites that can be used for a long time. The self-destruct program of the Guardian Planet can be installed appropriately.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    First of all, it is necessary to reduce the man-made items left behind by space missions, but ** rockets are a good choice.

Related questions
23 answers2024-08-04

Density is an inherent property of an object, which does not change with changes in the environment, that is, the density of an object does not change in space.

17 answers2024-08-04

There is kinetic energy, which is the force when an object is launched into space! >>>More

5 answers2024-08-04

In 2054, the earth's population will increase dramatically, and people without homes will be everywhere. The architect built a space city, and the space city is a city built in the sky, so that human beings have a place to live, but they found another thing, how to get on the space city. The architect thought about it for a long time, and finally made a flying machine and a passage to fly to the space city!

6 answers2024-08-04

Edwin Hubble (also known as the father of galactic astronomy) One of the famous figures of modern cosmology and the founder of extragalactic astronomy, he established Hubble's law. >>>More

16 answers2024-08-04

This sentence is followed by: a person who is good for the people. >>>More