The thief stole something from my house and was stoned to death by falling from the chandelier, and

According to normal people's thinking, thieves are originally an illegal profession, and thieves come to my house to steal things to damage my rights and interests, so why is the head of the household still responsible if the thief is injured in the process of stealing?

This matter should be treated in two waysFirst of all, if it is clear that the thief's behavior is true and it happened in the process of stealing, the fault lies with the thief, and the homeowner should not bear any responsibility. But if the thief's family sues the homeowner for special infringement and does not admit that the thief stole something, then it will be difficult for the homeowner to tell the story, and the trouble will be big.

If the owner of the house is chasing the thief in the back, the thief runs in front, and the two people do not have physical contact. If the thief falls to his death, then this is an accident and the owner of the house is not responsible. The death of the thief was entirely caused by the thief's own actions, and he could not blame others.

If the owner of the house has a dispute with the thief in the process of chasing the thief, and the thief falls to his death in the process of tearing with the owner, then the owner of the house should bear a certain amount of fault responsibility. Thieves should be punished for stealing things, but the death of thieves because of a dispute with the owner of the house clearly has undue consequences. For the death of the thief, the owner of the house should bear certain tort liability.

As for the judgment of whether the head of the household is at fault for the thief stealing something and falling to death, the following two points are mainly considered:

First, whether the perpetrator violated the obligations expressly provided for in laws and administrative regulations. For example, the law sets standards of conduct in a particular area, and the actor is negligent if he violates these standards;

Second, whether the perpetrator violated a reasonable person's duty of care. The duty of care of reasonableness mainly refers to the degree of care that most people should achieve in a given situation.

In this case, the residence is a place of isolation from the outside world, and trespassing without permission would be suspected of violating the law, seriously suspected of committing a crime, let alone trespassing based on other criminal intent. At the same time, because the house is different from the public property, the cleaning of the house floor is not a mandatory obligation of the law, and the owner of the house has done his own need, and it is impossible for him to foresee and will not foresee that there will be a thief burglary at night and the thief's death due to the slippery road.

The homeowner's legal duty of care towards the entrant:

1. Invitees. For invitees, homeowners have a high duty of care. If the invitee is injured, the homeowner is liable for tort.

2. Licensee. In the case of the licensee, the homeowner has a general duty of care. If the licensee is injured, the degree of fault of the homeowner must be considered.

3. Unscrupulous intruders. The homeowner has no duty of care in the event of an intruder. If an intruder is injured, the homeowner is not liable.

In Chinese law, the judgment of fault and causation is related to the above-mentioned legal principles.

I think you should immediately choose to call the police and put this matter in court to deal with it, because this is an accident, and the thief came to your house to steal something, he has already violated the criminal law, and the family's request for compensation from you is unreasonable, and you need to use the law to protect your rights and interests.

It should be prosecuted through the law, it is necessary to protect the scene at the time, and it is also necessary to leave evidence of the thief's theft for the police to deal with, and this matter has nothing to do with it, so it cannot be compensated privately.

You should take the initiative to apologize, so that there will be a good solution, if you don't call the police, the other party may blackmail yourself, or even lie to yourself.

You sue the family of the thief and the baby, burglary, and ask them to pay for the damages.

You look for manufacturers and decorators, and you want 2 million!

You didn't nail the chandelier properly, and there were no safety tips, so you are responsible

This family is also crazy about money! They should compensate you for your losses!

By the way, whoever dies is justified, his family members come to ask for money, you will die to show him, will he still get the money?

You can ask their family to compensate for the damages, can your house still be lived?

There is no need to pay, if you have to pay for it, you will never believe in the law again, of course, if you push him down is another story.

On the one hand, the thief stole your things, you are the victim, if he is not dead, but the things he stole are not very valuable, according to the logic of losing money, we have to make up for the money he did not steal, what is this called? It doesn't make sense to leave it alone, and no country encourages crime.

On the other hand, theft itself is a crime. When a thief encounters a victim or a family member or someone else, his theft may turn into snatching, robbery, or even intentional injury, or he may run away. As long as your self-help behavior does not exceed a reasonable limit, you don't need it, because your behavior bears legal responsibility, but if it exceeds the limit, for example, if someone steals a mobile phone from you, and runs away when they see you, you don't even want a mobile phone, but you want to break someone else's head, you will bear legal responsibility.

Similarly, if the thief falls to his death in an accident during the theft, this has nothing to do with you.

But if there's physical contact with you, that's a different story.