A thief came into my house to steal something and accidentally fell to his death, I didn t know anyt

There is no need to pay, if you have to pay for it, you will never believe in the law again, of course, if you push him down is another story.

On the one hand, the thief stole your things, you are the victim, if he is not dead, but the things he stole are not very valuable, according to the logic of losing money, we have to make up for the money he did not steal, what is this called? It doesn't make sense to leave it alone, and no country encourages crime.

On the other hand, theft itself is a crime. When a thief encounters a victim or a family member or someone else, his theft may turn into snatching, robbery, or even intentional injury, or he may run away. As long as your self-help behavior does not exceed a reasonable limit, you don't need it, because your behavior bears legal responsibility, but if it exceeds the limit, for example, if someone steals a mobile phone from you, and runs away when they see you, you don't even want a mobile phone, but you want to break someone else's head, you will bear legal responsibility.

Similarly, if the thief falls to his death in an accident during the theft, this has nothing to do with you.

But if there's physical contact with you, that's a different story.

You don't need to be responsible, he must also want to run away, and he will fall if he walks relatively fast, and the injuries he suffered are very reasonable.

In this case, you do not need to be held responsible, because the thief's behavior is at his own risk, and he needs to be held responsible for his own actions.

If a thief accidentally falls and injures himself when he steals something from someone's house, the owner must not be responsible for this, it must be the thief who is responsible, and the thief also bears certain criminal responsibility for the theft.

There is no need to be responsible, because it is illegal for a thief to steal something, and it is not because the owner cannot create a crime of harm to a third party, so the owner does not need to be responsible.

There is no need to be held responsible for this, because it was the thief's own actions that caused him to be injured.

For this question, it is still more interesting, I personally think that the thief burglary, in fact, is a game between the psychological quality of the thief and the psychological quality of the owner, why do you say so? Because this is one of the factors that we can judge whether the owner is responsible or not.

From the thief's point of view, the thief's burglary sounds like a manifestation of "very domineering" and "very powerful", but in fact, as a thief himself, he is also very scared, and he is also frightened and takes risks.

Under normal circumstances, if there is a thief in our house, maybe everyone's instinctive reaction is to be more scared, and they will shout loudly, and at this time, if you encounter a more timid thief, or a thief with a weak heart, as soon as you hear the owner shouting, you will panic first and want to run away quickly. If you jump out of the window in a hurry and fall to your own death, then the owner of the house does not need to bear any responsibility. Because, after all, the thief jumping off the building has no direct relationship with the owner of the house.

Although the owner of the house shouted at the thief, this shouting was not intended to force the thief to jump off the building, but as an instinctive psychological reaction of a normal person, it was a kind of cry out of fear. Therefore, in this case, the owner should not be responsible for the death of the thief.

However, there is also a situation that some homeowners themselves are more courageous, or have better psychological quality in the face of these emergencies, and are more calm, not only will not panic in the face of thieves, but will also chase and beat thieves。At this time, if it is because of the persecution or pursuit of the landlord, the thief has no way to escape, and he has to use the method of jumping off the building to stop the pursuit of the landlord. So at this time, if the thief jumps off the building and falls and is injured, then the homeowner may bear some responsibility at this time, because there is a causal relationship between the thief jumping off the building and the pursuit of the homeowner.

Many people may feel that this is very unfair to the homeowner, because after all, thieves are lawbreakers。As a homeowner, whether it is chasing or abusing a thief, it is a situation of legitimate defense and should not be held responsible.

As a victim, of course, we can use legitimate defense, but we can't defend too much, because after all, there is also a legal liability for excessive defense。So in this case, it is recommended that we should deal with it as calmly as possible, as long as the thief does not personally threaten us, we do not need to put the thief to death, it is okay to pursue it appropriately, but excessive pursuit makes the thief want to "die to make the will" then the gain outweighs the loss.

A thief went to a house to steal something, accidentally fell down, and fell to his death. Does the host family need to be held responsible? Under normal circumstances, it should be irresponsible, for the following reasons:

1. For theft, regardless of whether it constitutes the crime of theft, the act itself is illegal, and any citizen has the right to arrest the thief and hand it over to the judicial authorities for legal responsibility. 2. Whether the thief repents climbing the stairs and falls to his death in order to commit theft, or to escape the arrest of the landlord or others, the nature of his behavior is to evade legal prosecution, and the act of evading legal responsibility should be denied in law; At the same time, the landlord or other people's pursuit and arrest of the thief is not illegal, and the thief can choose to be arrested, but he chooses to take the risk of climbing the stairs to escape, which is his own risk, and the first consequences should of course be borne by himself. The landlord or other person is not at fault in the process and should not be held legally liable.

Accidental injury includes two meanings: accident and injury. 1.The so-called accident refers to the subjective state of the insured, which means that the insured did not foresee the occurrence of the injury in advance or the occurrence of the injury was contrary to the subjective will of the insured, and its characteristics were non-intentional, external and sudden.

2.The so-called injury refers to the objective fact that the insured's body has been harmed by an external accident, which has damaged the integrity of the human body or damaged the physiological functions of organs and tissues. There are three elements of harm: the causative object, the object of the infringement, and the fact of the infringement.

According to whether it is insurable or not, accidental injuries can be divided into non-insurable accidental injuries, special insured accidental injuries and general insurable accidental injuries. Does that make sense?

I don't think you need to be responsible for this, in this case it should be the thief who is responsible for the world's hunger, you can split the cover to call the police, and let the limb police immediately catch the thief, you are also a victim.

You don't need to be held accountable for this because you are also a victim and the thief should take full responsibility.

You are not responsible for this, and you are also a victim in this matter.

should be responsible for copy, because the window is yours, many cases bai, the thief is seriously injured and disabled, you pay for it, and zhi and half dead is the worst you have to support him for a lifetime. And the reason is simple, who let your windows not be properly secured, and can't protect the thief. Repeat a second time, the window is yours so you are responsible for the safety of the thief.

China's laws are still not sound enough, they are all copied from foreign countries or copied from ancient China, and there is no innovation. And foreign laws, because of the national conditions of each country, one of the standards is to protect the bad guys. Ancient Chinese law was to protect the landlords and aristocrats, and then China copied foreign laws to lead to this consequence, and copied the old laws to adapt part of it to become its own, a small part of it increased, most of them did not create their own laws that were more conducive to China's national conditions according to their own conditions, and they could only change the national conditions to foreign countries according to their own national conditions (not all learned), and there are now national conditions, foreign national conditions and Chinese national conditions are obviously two different things, so many Chinese people are tragic.

After all, all kinds of laws in our big China are being tried out, and repeating it twice is a trial trial, understand no, we are a developing country, or the most potential, all kinds of laws are trying to make progress, and there is a lot of room for progress. It will be better for my big China in the future.

Then only think you're unlucky, after all, it's Shengauto, your family said that you fell to death?

No, because the host didn't do anything either.

If the thief's family sues, they will have to pay more or less compensation. The old man went to someone's orchard to steal fruit, fell from the tree and fell to his death, and the family sued the orchard, saying that the fruit tree grafting was too short to climb, what a far-fetched reason, the court actually sentenced the orchard to pay tens of thousands of dollars to the family of the deceased.