Two students are fighting, and one person throws something and smashes public property, who is respo

It must be the responsibility of the person who loses something, fight and fight, make trouble, what is the matter of throwing things, just make a small difference between two people, and whoever makes it must be responsible.

The responsibility is mainly on the student who lost something, but the other student is also responsible, so it's not one person's fault.

Of course, the classmate who lost the thing is responsible, although it is two people fighting, but there is only one person who acts of vandalism, and it has nothing to do with the other person, so it is only the person who lost the thing that should be compensated.

Whoever loses something is responsible. No one else has anything to do with it. For public property is broken by things that have been thrown away.

Both parties are responsible for this kind of thing! However, one party bears the primary responsibility, and the other party bears secondary responsibility, if the public property is not valuable, it may be criticism and education, and if it is a more valuable item, it must be financially compensated.

And two students fight, and one person loses something. Break the official business. In this case, they should all be responsible, of course, they are all responsible for breaking official business, and of course they are responsible for breaking official business. Bigger. You shouldn't be fighting in school or classrooms.

The responsibility is the one who broke the thing, and he should be liable for compensation, after all, it is the thing he threw that damaged the public property. The other guy was just making a fuss but didn't break anything.

Two students are fighting, one person throws something and breaks the public property, the main responsibility lies with the student who threw the object, and the secondary responsibility lies with the other student.

That must be to break that person, because he broke it with his hands, and it was wrong to throw things, one thing is one thing, and the compensation must be broken to that person, but both must be criticized.

This is obvious, of course, it is the responsibility of smashing things, after all, smashing things is definitely wrong, and smashing public property is just a mistake on top of a mistake.

Two students are fighting, one of them throws something and breaks the official business, the main responsibility lies with the student who broke the thing, but the other student also needs to bear a small part of the responsibility.

Two students are fighting, one person loses something, and the official business is broken, of course, both students are responsible, so they should take the initiative to write a review and apologize to the teacher for compensation.

Since it is two people fighting, then both people are responsible, but the severity of the responsibility is different, and the responsibility for breaking things is heavier.

Both people are responsible, just big or small, the primary responsibility lies with the one who lost the thing, and the other party has secondary responsibility.

This responsibility is generally divided into primary and secondary responsibilities. I am responsible, of course, for the person who lost it, because it was his subjective consciousness that was damaged because of him. But the other one also has a certain responsibility.

The responsibility should lie with the student who threw something and broke the public property, and he is directly responsible.

Both are responsible! The student who threw the object is primarily responsible.

Two students are fighting, one person throws something, and the official business is broken, let's also bring water, under normal circumstances, it should be the one who loses something, this is the main responsibility, and the other should also have secondary responsibility.

If two people don't fight, then the other person won't lose anything, so when we play, we must go to a more spacious place.

If two students are fighting, then one person throws something and breaks his official duties, and the responsibility should be shared equally by both people, because these two people are caused by the fight.

Hello, two students are fighting, one person throws something and breaks his official duties, of course, the responsibility lies with the student who threw something.

Two students fight, one loses something, and breaks the official business, both students are responsible, but the classmates who lose things are still bigger.

Whoever throws something and smashes public property is primarily responsible, but both people are responsible for a fight, and the other may be secondarily responsible.

Two students are fighting, and one person breaks something on official business, so I think the responsibility should be two people, or according to this person, it is also very understandable, after all, two people broke it in the process of fighting.

The responsibility of two people, if it is not a fight, will not break the public property.

For two students to fight, one of them lost something, and my aunt was broken, I think both of them have to compensate for this thing, after all, it is because you broke it in the process of fighting.

If two students smash public property because they fight with each other, then both of them should admit the corresponding responsibility.

Whoever breaks it must be his responsibility, and whoever loses it must be his responsibility.

This may be like this if both people are in charge, because after all, these are the people who did it.

That must be the responsibility of the person who threw things and smashed public property.

Summary. But after all, it's the two of you who made a fuss, so you two have to pay joint and several liability.

Two students are fighting, and one person throws something and smashes public property, who is responsible?

Hello, the lawyer is at your service.

Both students are responsible.

That's what I'd like to ask.

Of the two, who is more responsible.

The responsibility for overturning public schools is a little greater.

But it was because of the fight caused by the two.

So the responsibilities of both parties are about the same, huh.

In my case, he came after me and threw things at me, and I didn't want to mess with him, and a big water bottle flew and the TV was broken.

Did you have a verbal dispute?

No, he is the active party.

Then his responsibility is relatively greater.

But after all, it's the two of you who made a fuss, so you two have to pay joint and several liability.

However, the main compensation for TV is still paid by him.

It's just 28 open.

Something like this.

Okay, thank you, thank you, solve my doubts for the day.

You're welcome, it's my pleasure to serve you.