After the soldier was captured, why would he rather be executed obediently than dare to rise up and

Even ordinary people who don't often watch TV dramas know that most of the wars in ancient times were fought by soldiers using knives, guns and sticks to achieve their own goals, so the word "king and defeat" comes from here, the victor is naturally the supreme glory, and the defeated side has to compromise to survive, and even the soldiers and soldiers in their own camp will be captured, but they would rather be killed by the enemy than resist, in fact, there are two reasons for this, one is the feudal superstitious thinking of the ancient people, There is also an ancient man who was imprisoned by feudal thoughts. All in all, most of them are because of the clamping of the mind. <>

1. In fact, many people may not have heard the word "killing prisoners", although we often see captives captured after the defeat of one camp in TV dramas, but we don't know the specific whereabouts of these captives, of course, there are also a few TV series that clearly explain their whereabouts, nothing more than two points, some were brutally killed, and some surrendered to the enemy and joined the enemy's camp. In fact, these two are not very realistic, most of the ancient people were more loyal and had their own indestructible beliefs, this is because the ancient people had such thoughts, we have today's China, so it is almost impossible for the defeated and captured captives to surrender to the enemy. The second and most unlikely is to be killed by the victorious side, although this phenomenon is shown in some TV dramas, in fact, such a situation is rare, because the feudal superstition of people in ancient society is more serious, and they think that killing captives is a very inauspicious thing, so they generally do not kill captives.

2. The herd mentality of prisoners of warAlthough sometimes the defeated side has a large number of captured soldiers, it can even form a barracks. But why would they rather put their lives in the hands of the enemy and let others slaughter them, rather than choose to flee or resist? In fact, there is a herd mentality at work, a captive sees that the people next to him do not resist, and he follows everyone's footsteps with ease, and every captive thinks so, no one is willing to come forward, so they can only be killed willingly, and even if they successfully escape, they will be killed as deserters when they return to their barracks, so they have almost no chance of survival.

War has destroyed too many people, too many families, and since there is no way to avoid preventing it, we have to cherish the good life we have now to pay tribute to the heroes who contributed to peace. May there be no more captives in the world.

People are afraid of death. Rather than being executed immediately at a disadvantage, it is better to be captured and survive for a while. Nor will others necessarily execute the captives.

Because even if a soldier successfully resists and escapes, he will be executed as a deserter when he returns to the barracks, so he would rather be executed obediently than resist.

Because they know that resisting is futile, and they will even be killed in advance, it is better to wait quietly for them to deal with it!

Because they know that such a resistance is useless, it is nothing more than to let themselves die faster.

Or is it because I know that I will die if I resist, and there may be a way to live if I surrender.

The main thing is the price of resistance, which is likely to be executed more quickly, the tragic nature of the war.

Because he is doomed to lose, even if he resists, he will be executed.

It should be out of mind that he wants to be repatriated.

Because I knew that there was no chance of winning, I didn't dare to move.

Because the opponent's soldiers are not fools, unless there is an emergency, the victorious side has to clean up the battlefield, the first task is to collect the opponent's first ammunition, document intelligence, statistics of the number of people and results, etc., for the corpse of the opposing soldier, cruelly stab the corpse one by one with a bayonet, to prevent someone from pretending to be dead, merciful dig a big pit, and bury all the enemy dead, so that people can be buried in the ground. - Playing dead in both cases doesn't end well.

Unless the situation is urgent, there is no time to clean the battlefield, or there is no time to carefully clean the battlefield and retreat, then it is possible to escape.

Of course, there is also a situation, that is, the battlefield is in a place with poor living conditions, such as deserts, wastelands, oceans, and the cold, at this time, even if you pretend to be dead and escape because it is difficult to survive alone, it is still death, it is better to take the initiative to be captured, maybe you will not be able to die. In this case, the soldiers of the defeated side preferred to be captured.

Because according to the Geneva Conventions, soldiers who are captured cannot be beheaded, and can enjoy preferential treatment policies, waiting for the two sides to exchange prisoners of war.