How do you ask questions in the debate on talent and mechanics?

It's important to tell me who you are on and what number of debaters you are. First of all, it is recommended that you think about the argument from the other party's point of view, what the opponent will say, what to ask, how to summarize, and from which point of view if you want to win. If you can't do it, you will definitely be able to defeat the other party, then try to think of some tricky questions, and ask the opponent's defense friend some things about this issue in your life, and record them, so that after asking questions, when the other party asks questions, you can use what you know in these classes to refute him, so that the other party will definitely mess up, and you will succeed.

As for the content of the question, you can look it up on the Internet, and remember, the more tricky the better. Suggestion: Imagine the other person according to your own question, try to anticipate the whole outcome, and come up with a countermeasure to knock the other person down with one blow.

Another thing is to communicate and practice with your teammates more, otherwise it is easy to make a mess.

That's all the advice, I hope it helps, although I didn't tell you what to ask, but these superficial things are fine. It's all hand-beaten.,It's okay to give a reward.,Thank you.,I wish you success.。

What are the specific debate topics?

The general question is that the four teammates have a main line, and you must be clear about the questions prepared by each teammate in advance, and the bottom line of the whole team should be clear, mainly based on the argument of the first argument and the opponent's loopholes to attack or defend.

Debate competition, about professional talents and compound talents. It needs to be comprehensive and professional.

Hello, glad to answer for you! In this impetuous and information age, all kinds of knowledge are coming, all kinds of learning but not refined, and those who know a little bit of everything are called compound talents, but in the long-term development, professional talents are more competitive. The so-called one trick is eaten all over the world, and it is the last word to specialize in the art industry.

I hope my reply will help you and have a great day! 

I'm the one who argues three times.

Hope it helps.

I'm square three times, you have to help me find it.

I'm not the opposite, I'm not the opposite, I'm not the opposite.

OK means your point of view is that there is a need for exams to discover talents?

Right. You help me find a four-way argument.

Debate: Exams are needed to identify talent.

You click on this link to take a look.

If the exam can also be issued, it will be able to dig people

If so, then there will be no Ao Na Zhi Si Li Jiacheng and other dao people They didn't graduate from elementary school.

Discovering talent within is a starting point.

Accommodate the process from 0 to 1 while choosing from 10 to 1. Discovery is the use of talents, and selection may be the burial of most talents. They are a reverse process.

Although exams are required in China, but without exams, there will be no talent discovery in China? Then there is no talent before the invention exam? Don't discover talents, there will be no talents?

Because I think that in today's society, people should be realistic, we should know how many companies are applying for jobs now, and they are also selecting talents in character, so I think the selection of talents does not need to be examined.

I think exams are too absolute. Isn't it time to have quality education? So why? Isn't it because exams aren't that panacea? There are many ways to discover talents! You can recommend yourself!

How did Qu Yuan die? Why did Li Bai go so early???

Do they fail the test or do they fail to get good grades?

Don't say that there are few people like this, at least you only know so few! You must know that there are many people who have not met talents, and now there are even more! They are not non-talents who can't pass the test and are not capable, I can tell you very clearly that they are talents!!

I just can't find my own platform. So I don't think the test is the best way to choose. Therefore, from a higher level of perspective, talents do not need to take exams!

There are many people who have found a better way out for themselves because of their wise job hopping.

Good point. However, in the course of the debate, you may be questioned by the positive side at any time, you who do not need the so-called examination, do not need the so-called selection of talents, do not need the opposite side of this and that, and still go to school every day to study, receive education, take exams, and so on. What should you do? Be prepared in advance.

I think this is a good point, but it has its drawbacks. But not everyone thinks so and will be accepted. Education, how many years. Every year, we shout to grasp reform, grasp education, and constantly add new programs and new regulations, but the effect is in the first place

The difficulty of education has increased, and the level of education has been constantly required to reach new heights, but students are often the victims of it, whether they are excellent students or students with unsatisfactory grades, they cannot test their comprehensive quality, their moral level, and their ...... characterHowever, whether it is a teacher or a parent, they are used to talking by looking at the score and the ranking.

First of all, what is the definition of China's talent standards, it is estimated that there are all kinds of things; Is it an academic qualification? Graduate students at Peking University can only sell pork; Workers who join the society, those with formal academic qualifications are laid off, but those who are left behind are those with no academic qualifications. There are many people who have no academic qualifications and have to postpone their retirement; However, people with the same professional education in our society cannot find a job, is this a society that values academic qualifications?

How many people who are recognized as 'capable' are idle;Now there are people in all walks of life in society, 'the leader says you can do it, you can do it, and if you can't do it, you can do it; If the leader says you can't do it, you can't do it, and you can't do it; And it's not convincing'.

For example. For example, the poet immortal Li Bai said that he was too proud and arrogant, but his conceit and arrogance had capital. "100 Poems on Fighting Wine" made him win great prestige among the people, and finally attracted the attention of the emperor, and Tang Xuanzong decided to appoint "Corporal Lixian" exceptionally.

Gorky did not have a college education, Edison did not graduate from elementary school, and Bill Gates was just a high school student, but they were all outstanding talents.

More than 40 percent of the 100 richest people in the United States do not have higher education.

Personal opinion: Debate is just to select people with advanced thinking If you are in the exam Why don't you get the test questions Do you still need to debate the exam: you can directly put the questions that need to be debated Put it in the test Debate competition: just listen to the most convincing and forward-looking generalizations.