Debate tournament material about partial talent , first aid!

It's good to take a look at this.,The composition is very easy to write.,Generally speaking, people who can speak and understand the way usually write their essays quickly.,It's just not good to say it.,Think about it yourself.,You can't always rely on copying.。

?Top Gun ( 2000) ?Eagle Strikes the Sky (2001).Ask Your Heart (2002).

Knowing the difficulties and retreating from the current affairs for Junjie, he will accept the risk when he sees the good, do not make unnecessary sacrifices to the risk cost, and debate from these aspects Classmates, the so-called debate competition is to use what the other party said in the debate to seize his loopholes to refute, you need to think quickly, logically, and have a wide range of knowledge, there is no perfect answer, you can only give you such an idea, you want to rely on the Internet to rely on others, you are not qualified to debate, or simply change people as soon as possible.

This debate was debated in '99 between the University of Malaya and the University of Macau, and the process is recounted as follows: Pro: The University of Malaya Network Brings People Closer to the Opposition:

University of Macau Internet Makes People More Distant Chair: Does the Internet bring people closer or more distant? That's what we're going to do today based on the results of the pre-match draw.

No one spoke at the party, all on their phones.

I don't communicate with my family.

First, the Nanjing Peng Yu case, as well as several similar cases that occurred later, the Wan Xin case in Chongqing, the Peng Yu case in Nanjing, and the Li Kaiqiang case in Zhengzhou, did indeed play a negative role in social morality to a certain extent.

On December 15, 2010, Xiao Yusheng, a veteran cadre in Shenzhen, fell in the community, and no one stepped forward to help him, and died more than 20 minutes later. The security guard said that it was not indifference, and he was afraid of taking responsibility. Many people in the post mentioned that they were greatly affected by Peng Yu's case, and they were afraid that their kindness would not be rewarded!

The case is costing the whole of society dearly, and everyone can be a victim!

Second, there are indeed unhealthy tendencies in the current social atmosphere. "Good people are not rewarded", "bad people are rampant", speculators benefit, and those who help others "shed blood and tears". College students saved people and sacrificed themselves bravely, but they were ...... by unscrupulous corpse diggers who "demanded a price for corpses".The extremely unhealthy specimens of reality are full of estrangement and indifference between people.

The third is that "helping the needy" and righteousness and courage have become scarce commodities, and the corresponding appearance is the decline of morality, and the deep-seated reason is the rupture of social trust bonds caused by the weak rational power of citizens' contracts.

Don't worry, everyone has a satellite positioning, so you can see the old man fall and quickly help him up.

Some of the theoretical points can be as follows.

1. What today's society needs is comprehensive talents, and what is advocated is all-round development, and people with sound morality, intellect and physique can make greater contributions to the society, and at the same time, it is easier to realize their own value and be more likely to succeed.

2. The barrel theory That is to say, the final capacity of a barrel is not determined by its longest plank, but precisely by its shortest plank, and it can be said that a person's great achievements often depend on the degree of correction of his shortcomings, rather than the degree of play of his strengths.

3. The harm caused by the shortcomings to a person's success is far greater than the success that can be achieved by a person's strengths.

There are many examples.

About the first argument.

We can discuss the current direction of human resource development from the perspective of the national education policy.

We can also start from the "three products" of college students and discuss that those who are partial to virtue and have no talent are called defective products, those who are partial to talent and no virtue are called drugs, and those who are not virtuous and talentless are called waste products.

All in all, it's not right to focus on any of them, and it's hard to succeed.

The second argument.

The most realistic example of the college entrance examination The average of each subject in the college entrance examination is the king students who are partial to the subjects are generally difficult to successfully enter the school of their dreams.

In addition, according to the authoritative IDC company, in the United States, by 2005, the total cost of employee training will reach 11.4 billion US dollars, and the president of GE McNeil, known as the "best manager" in the United States, declared that GE's annual employee training expenses will reach 500 million US dollars, and will increase exponentially. Hewlett-Packard has an in-house education program on management practices, and this training program alone costs millions of dollars a year in research funding. They study not only the content of education, but also which type of education is more acceptable to people.

In essence, employee training is to increase the capacity of these "buckets" and enhance the overall strength of the enterprise through training. In order to improve the overall performance of the enterprise, in addition to the training of all employees, it is necessary to pay more attention to the development of "short boards" - non-star employees.

There are a lot of companies that believe in this theory and look for it.

About the third argument.

This argument requires concrete examples.

For example, Guan Yu has no force and strategy, but he lacks the cultivation of being good and good, and finally loses Jingzhou and walks to Maicheng.

For example, Cao Cao can be said to be both civil and military, but when he was recruiting Zhang Xiu, he was killed in battle because of his lust, and General Dian Wei and Cao Ang's eldest son almost became a ghost under the sword.

And so on -- there's a lot of examples of that in history, and you can sort them out.

As for the manuscript, I don't know what number of debaters you are, but every debater's manuscript is different.

However, I suggest that you can still write the manuscript yourself, which can be regarded as a kind of exercise for yourself, not only to improve your ability, but also to be more familiar with the manuscript, and to perform better on the spot, so that you will not read the manuscript all the time.

What a coincidence, we just debated this here, and our opposing argument is to accept it when it is good, and we won. Are you the opposite? Is the positive side going to take advantage of the victory to pursue?

I don't know how to say it, you need a lot of examples, keep asking him with examples. It is also necessary to explain that it is not unmotivated to accept when it is good, and it is stagnant, and it does not mean that it cannot be continued, but to rectify, consolidate, and recuperate, which is the final referee's comment. It's like building a house without building a floor to reinforce it, rather than building it to the end in one go.

If you go too far, of course, you will accept it when you see it.