What is the meaning and efficacy of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 processor?

Increase recognizability.

1. Qualcomm's positioning of the Snapdragon 652 650 chips is a high-end platform processor that provides the ultimate mobile entertainment, which is second only to the Snapdragon 820 in the Qualcomm product series, but the 652 650 is comparable to the Snapdragon 800 series in terms of function and performance, depending on the current mainstream flagship processor as a competitor, and even in a lot of reports, the Snapdragon 652 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon 810 in some performance.

2. The new mid-to-high-end processor, the original code name was 618 620, and it may have been changed to 650 652 because of the stronger performance, mainly because the large core uses the A72 core, which is said to be much better than the large core A57 core on the 615, and the GPU has also become Andrew's Antutu running score has exceeded the sub-flagship Snapdragon 808.

3. In terms of processor architecture, Snapdragon 650 adopts a 28nm manufacturing process, consisting of two A72 cores + four A53 cores, and the highest frequency is equipped with Adreno 510. It supports dual-channel LPDDR3 RAM, with a maximum frequency of 933MHz, supports full 4G dual SIM dual standby for the whole network, and supports downlink CAT 7.

The latest mid-to-high-end CPU produced by Qualcomm in the United States, in terms of processor architecture, Snapdragon 650 adopts 28nm manufacturing process, consisting of two A72 cores + four A53 cores, and the highest frequency is equipped with Adreno 510. It supports dual-channel LPDDR3 RAM, with a maximum frequency of 933MHz, supports full 4G dual SIM dual standby for the whole network, and supports downlink CAT 7. In terms of architecture, the Snapdragon 650 is a few points stronger than the 808, but with a slight reduction control.

And the Snapdragon 650 on the Redmi Note 3 is not weak at all, the performance of the Snapdragon 650 can be said to be completely killed Snapdragon 808, the implication is that the 360 released yesterday**2999 The cool mobile phone geek version is going to be slapped in the face, just used on the thousand-yuan machine, but the 650 This newly listed CPU should not be underestimated!

1.Qualcomm renamed the Snapdragon 618 620 to the Snapdragon 652 650, and there is no change in hardware and performance, but the naming has been adjusted, and the reason is mainly to increase recognition, because of the hardware and sex

The new Snapdragon 652 650 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon 800 series, and in terms of functionality, it also includes almost all the features of the Snapdragon 800 series. 2.Qualcomm's positioning of the Snapdragon 652 650 chips is a high-end platform processor that provides the ultimate mobile entertainment, which is second only to the Snapdragon 820 in the Qualcomm product series, but the 652 650 is comparable to the Snapdragon 800 series in terms of function and performance, depending on the current mainstream flagship processor as a competitor, and even in a lot of reports, the Snapdragon 652 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon in some performance First of all, the Snapdragon 652 650 uses Arm Cortex A72+The 64-bit multi-core architecture of the A53 is made on a 28nm process, while the difference between the 652 and the 650 is that one is 8 cores and the other is 6 cores, and the others are exactly the same.

The Adreno 510 GPU supports APIs such as DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES, as well as Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC), which means that less bandwidth is used to transfer data of the same size, so the computation is more expensive and the details are more detailed.

Judging from the comparison of the CPU parameters of Peiyuan mobile phones, Snapdragon 625 and Snapdragon 650 have their own highlights, of which Snapdragon 625 has a more advanced 14nm process, higher specification network support, and also adds dual cameras and fast charging support. The highlight of the Snapdragon 650 is that it is equipped with a higher-spec GPU, supports dual-channel memory, etc.

In terms of CPU performance, Snapdragon 625 is not inferior to 650, the main reason is that Snapdragon 625 can run at the highest frequency of octa-core full blood, and Snapdragon 650 is composed of two sets of quad-core architectures after all, plus the frequency is slightly lower, multi-core efficiency is naturally discounted, the following is a comparison of running scores.

Judging from the benchmark test, although the single-core performance of the Snapdragon 625 is not as good as that of the Snapdragon 650, the multi-core performance is much better.

From the perspective of comprehensive performance, the Snapdragon 625 can be compared to the Snapdragon 650 in terms of CPU performance, but its first disturbance GPU performance is quite different from that of the Snapdragon 652. The Snapdragon 625 integrates the Adreno 506 GPU and only supports single-channel LPDDR3 memory, while the Snapdragon 650 integrates the Adreno 510 GPU and supports dual-channel LPDDR3 memory, and in terms of GPU, the Snapdragon 625 is about 60% of the 652.

Here's where the Snapdragon 625 and 650 stand in the phone's CPU ladder diagram, as shown in the image below.

All have their own advantages and disadvantages, but overall there is not much difference.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 processor is a processor designed by Qualcomm for high-end mobile terminals. The processor consists of two Cortex-A72 cores and four Cortex-A53 cores in a six-core architecture.

The Snapdragon 660 is manufactured using a 14nm process and is equipped with an octa-core kryo core for performance. Qualcomm promises that the Snapdragon 660 will have a 20% improvement in performance compared to the Snapdragon 653.

The speed of processing has increased.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 is ten percent faster than the Snapdragon 650.

However, the same mid-level processor from Qualcomm, the increase of 10% is not too obvious.

The processor of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 series is the fastest processor in the phone.

If you have a need for games, you can choose the 650 (there are fewer models of the 650 at present, which has been replaced by the 652 653).

If you have requirements for battery life, you can choose 625 with a more advanced process.

1. Compared with 650, the 625 is launched in the past, so the relatively new 14nm process is adopted, which brings lower power consumption and some new functions (refer to the figure below);

Second, its own 625 positioning is lower than 650, although it is an 8-core processor, but it is 8 A53 cores, and 650 is 2 A72 large cores + 4 A53, 625 in terms of CPU and not much cheaper, GPU 625 uses Adreno 506, 650 uses Adreno 510, GPU performance 650 is much better (refer to the figure below).

In terms of performance, the Snapdragon 650 crushes the Snapdragon 625 The Snapdragon 625 chip itself is not built for performance The Snapdragon 625 focuses on power consumption and battery life If you play games, use the Snapdragon 650 and don't play games, and the Snapdragon 625 is also a good choice The power consumption of the Snapdragon 625 is very low, and the battery life is longer with the same battery.

The 625 is relatively lower than the 650, so it adopts the relatively new 14nm process, which brings lower power consumption and some new functions (refer to the figure below), but the positioning of the 625 itself is lower than that of the 650, although it is an 8-core processor.

Looking at the picture and speaking, Snapdragon 625 has the latest 14nm process power consumption on Snapdragon 625 is ahead, and on the CPU Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core full blood operation, but it is only comparable to Snapdragon 650.

On the GPU, the Snapdragon 650 directly crushes the Snapdragon 625, but in the Snapdragon 625's higher-spec network support, in addition to adding dual cameras and fast charging support.

625 is relatively 650 compared to the previous launch, so the use of the relatively new 14nm process, brings lower power consumption, as well as some new functions (refer to the figure below), but itself 625 positioning is lower than 650, although it is an 8-core processor, but it is 8 A53 cores, and 650 is 2 A72 large cores + 4 A53, CPU 625 is not much cheap, GPU 625 uses Adreno 506, 650 uses Adreno 510, GPU performance 650 is much better (see figure below).

A ** evaluation).

Therefore, if you have a need for games, you can choose the 650 (there are fewer 650 models at present, and it has been replaced by 652 653).

If you have requirements for battery life, you can choose 625 with a more advanced process.

The 650 is more powerful, but it consumes a lot more power.

625 performance is average, but it is more power-saving, depending on your actual use, if you want to have a long battery life, you will be 625, and if you want strong performance, you will be 650

In terms of overall performance, the Snapdragon 652 has an average score of 72,318 points, and the Snapdragon 625 has an average score of 68,463 points.

The average single-core score is 7666 points for the Snapdragon 652 and 4034 points for the Snapdragon 625.

GPU Benchmark The Snapdragon 652 has an average score of 16,588 points, and the Snapdragon 625 has an average score of 9,766 points.

Snapdragon 650 has stronger performance with two A72 large cores and Adreon510GPU blessing Playing games is more stable But the Snapdragon 650 process lags behind TSMC 28nm The power consumption is relatively high While the Snapdragon 625 process is advanced 14nm The main power saving performance is relatively weaker The CPU part is all small cores A53 Adreon506GPU is only two-thirds of the 510 Lacks a large core The game performance is a little worse If you play games, it is also recommended that the Snapdragon 650 has stronger performance Choose the Snapdragon 625 for daily use, which consumes less power and has stronger battery life.

The 650 performs better, with 2 A72 high-performance cores;

625 only has A53 cores and no A72 cores, and the performance is much lower, and the advantage is that it adopts a new 14nm process, which has a lower power consumption.