-
Summary. Dear, hello, I'm glad to answer for you how much HiSilicon Kirin 960 is equivalent to Snapdragon is Snapdragon 820 processor Kirin 960 is equivalent to Snapdragon 820 processor, Kirin 960 is a processor launched by Huawei, Kirin 960 adopts 8-core design, composed of four A73 large cores and four A53 small cores, GPU is Mali G71 MP8, and the processor is built using 16nm process technology. The Kirin 960 is equivalent to the Snapdragon 821.
Compared with the Kirin 960 and the Snapdragon 821, the Huawei Kirin 960 CPU is more powerful, and the multi-core performance exceeds the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 by a large margin, while the GPU is still slightly inferior to the Adreno 530 on the Snapdragon 821. It can be seen that the Kirin 960 and the Snapdragon 821 have their own focuses, the Kirin 960 CPU is stronger, and the Snapdragon 821 GPU is stronger. In terms of actual game performance, although the GPU theoretical performance of the Snapdragon 821 is stronger, the operation of the game requires not only GPU rendering, but also CPU computing, and the Kirin 960 benefits from a more powerful CPU, and the performance is better than that of the Snapdragon 821.
Hurry up. Dear, hello, I'm glad to answer for you how much HiSilicon Kirin 960 is equivalent to Snapdragon is Snapdragon 820 processor Kirin 960 is equivalent to Snapdragon 820 processor, Kirin 960 is a processor launched by Huawei, Kirin 960 adopts 8-core design, composed of four A73 large cores and four A53 small cores, GPU is Mali G71 MP8, and the processor is built using 16nm process technology. The Kirin 960 is equivalent to the Snapdragon 821.
Compared with the Kirin 960 and the Snapdragon 821, the Huawei Kirin 960 CPU is more powerful, and the multi-core performance exceeds the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 by a large margin, while the GPU is still slightly inferior to the Adreno 530 on the Snapdragon 821. It can be seen that the Kirin 960 and the Snapdragon 821 have their own focuses, the Kirin 960 CPU is stronger, and the Snapdragon 821 GPU is stronger. In terms of actual game performance, although the GPU theoretical performance of the Snapdragon 821 is stronger, the operation of the game requires not only GPU rendering, but also CPU computing, and the Kirin 960 benefits from a more powerful CPU, and the performance is better than that of the Snapdragon 821.
-
The gap between the HiSilicon Kirin 960 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821: The performance is different, the running score is different.
First, the performance is different:
The HiSilicon Kirin 960 has 8 cores, of which four large cores are A73 architecture, which is also the first time that a commercial processor has used the latest A73 architecture, and the four small cores are still A53 architecture.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 is a SoC that is more used in mainstream flagship mobile phones, using a four-core independent KRYO architecture, large core, small core, GPU uses Adreno 530, and the frequency has reached 653MHz.
Second, the running score is different:
The two mobile phones selected for the benchmark comparison are almost identical in terms of configuration, one is the Snapdragon 820 processor 6GB RAM+64GB ROM, and the other is the Snapdragon 821 processor 6GB RAM+64GB ROM, so the test results are still relatively representative.
Antutu test data shows that the total score of the Snapdragon 821 mobile phone is 163546, while the total score of the Snapdragon 820 mobile phone is 142114, and the performance is indeed stronger than the Snapdragon 821. In terms of comparison of individual links, Snapdragon 821 has almost achieved comprehensive suppression, especially in terms of CPU, image computing and 3D performance, Snapdragon 821 has obvious advantages.
Parameter configuration. The Snapdragon 821 processor has a built-in four-chip Kyro quad-core architecture, with two high-frequency cores at the highest frequency, two low-frequency cores at the highest frequency, and a GPU frequency of 650MHz. As a comparison, the Snapdragon 820 of the previous work, the main frequency of the two high-frequency cores is, the main frequency of the low-frequency core is 624MHz.
In other aspects, the Snapdragon 821 and 820 are the same, both are equipped with X12 LTE modem baseband, support, up to 600Mbps downlink high-speed network, upload up to 150Mbps, carrier aggregation support downlink 3*20MHz, uplink 2*20MHz.
The above content reference: Encyclopedia - Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
-
980 is better. There is a very simple way to distinguish the quality of the processor from the 980 to the 960, which is to look at the number and the first digit represents the positioning, which is the high-end, mid-range, and low-end. The 9 in the Kirin processor represents the same high-end first digit, and then look at the second digit.
The higher the number, the newer the processor and the better the performance in general.
PS: The Kirin processor has been relatively poor for a long time, but the Kirin processor has made great progress in each generation, especially in the past two years (Kirin 980 990), and the progress has been rapid. So although the 960 and 980 are both high-end processors, the gap is still very huge.
-
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 and HiSilicon Kirin 920 are both in terms of parameters:
In terms of CPU, there is not much difference between the two, with the 920 having slightly higher performance and more power saving.
In terms of GPU, 801 is Adreno330, 920 is Mailt628MP4, in terms of performance, 801 has more advantages, but Mail series GPU has good compatibility and is easier to drive than 330.
In terms of network, 920 has more advantages, and there are others, both of which are almost the same, and the parameters are 920 highs.
The 801 uses a 4-core KRAIT400 architecture CPU, and the single-core performance is superior, between A9 and A15.
The 920 uses 8 A7A15 large and small core architecture CPUs and a co-core, because these 8 cores can be turned on freely, so it will not heat up as much as Samsung's dual quad-cores, and the co-core can collect sensor data with ultra-low power consumption.
-
One: The gap is about 15% of the performance of Qualcomm or Samsung's processors in the same period, and second: the computing is 960, and the graphics processing is definitely 820.
Reason 1: Although the HiSilicon Kirin 960 processor is based on the architecture and main patented technology of the international ARM company and then produced by TSMC in Taiwan (it will not be produced in China), it can also be named a domestic title, and the performance is not very optimistic, especially in the international and industrial circles. Each generation of HiSilicon Kirin processors came out with a high profile, advertising how good the performance was, but later it turned out that it was still not good, especially difficult to compete with Apple, Samsung, and Qualcomm processors at the same time.
This time, it is said that the CPU single-core and multi-core performance of the 960 processor is excellent, but the comprehensive performance of the chip is not only these 2 items. Huawei processors have never dared to use the world's authoritative and famous test software 3DMark to evaluate. In the 3DMark software, the performance of the HiSilicon 950 955 processor is similar to that of Qualcomm 800 or Samsung 5433, and the 960 is difficult to catch up even if the performance is more than 100% higher than that of the 955, and the gap is about 15% of the performance of Qualcomm or Samsung's processors in the same period.
2: In the environment where flagship mobile phones at home and abroad are invariably equipped with Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, Huawei mobile phones equipped with Kirin chips are unique. It is true that Huawei's Kirin chips have made significant progress in recent years, from the world's first LTE Cat6 standard Kirin 920, to the first 16nm Finfet Plus process Kirin 950, and then to the first thousand-yuan 16nm Finfet Plus process Kirin 650, Huawei Kirin has gained a firm foothold in the chip industry.
Now there is news that Huawei's next-generation flagship will be equipped with Kirin 960 chips, we might as well talk on paper through some specifications of **, and see how far Huawei Kirin is from Qualcomm Snapdragon.
955 synthesis is not as good as 820, CPU single-core performance is weaker than 820, but due to 8 cores, multi-core performance is better than 820, the fatal point is GPU, GPU is far weaker than 820 GPU, and 821 is the high-frequency version of 820, it is conceivable that 955 comprehensive is not as good as 821.
One is more expensive and the other is more expensive.
Advantages and disadvantages of HiSilicon Kirin processors and Qualcomm Snapdragon processors. >>>More
Summary. Hello, I'm glad to answer for you, Snapdragon is a series of CPUs produced by Qualcomm. Qualcomm is a manufacturer, and the current top is the Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm currently has two series: Snapdragon and Kirin. >>>More
The Snapdragon 660 and Kirin 970 are very different. These two processors have at least four generations of right. And the Kirin 970 is the best processor on the market right now, and it's capable of handling eight things at once. And the Xiaolong 660 can only handle four. <>
Increase recognizability.
1. Qualcomm's positioning of the Snapdragon 652 650 chips is a high-end platform processor that provides the ultimate mobile entertainment, which is second only to the Snapdragon 820 in the Qualcomm product series, but the 652 650 is comparable to the Snapdragon 800 series in terms of function and performance, depending on the current mainstream flagship processor as a competitor, and even in a lot of reports, the Snapdragon 652 is close to the previous generation flagship Snapdragon 810 in some performance. >>>More