The doll opened the door at school, and the door lock was broken, and the teacher called the parents

Personally, I think that this is unreasonable, because you have to look at it first, if it is said that the child deliberately made it, and then the door lock is broken, the teacher asks the child's parents to compensate for the claim, it is very reasonable, because the child deliberately broke it, alas, if it is broken under normal use, then the parents do not have to claim, because the door lock will always be broken, alas, the school also has this kind of business, to replace the better door lock, so there is no need for parents to claim.

It depends on the specific situation, if the door lock is about to be broken, and the child just breaks it at the moment of opening the school door, it is not right for the teacher to claim compensation from the parents, but if the child deliberately destroys the door lock and causes the door lock to be broken, the parents should compensate.

I think it makes sense. While the doll opens the door at school. The door lock is broken. The teacher called the parents to claim compensation. Dolls don't have an economy**. The doll is underage again. Parents are the first guardians of the doll. It makes sense for teachers to do this.

It's really unreasonable, but parents should still go to school, ask about the situation at the time, and then discuss with the teacher, compensation is still possible, but it should be clear that the child did not deliberately break the lock, and can be compensated, but the responsibility should be clear, and the child cannot be wronged.

If the doll did not deliberately break the door lock, but opened the door normally and caused the damage to the door lock, the teacher should not call the parents to compensate, because the teacher's practice is neither reasonable nor reasonable, let alone legal.

If the door lock is really deliberately broken by the child, then it is okay for the teacher to ask the parents to compensate, if the child is careless, or the lock is originally problematic, then it should not be compensated.

I don't think it's reasonable, the door lock in the classroom is used by many children, and it is a public vulnerable property, no matter who it is? As long as it's not intentionally broken, you don't need to accompany it.

I think it is unreasonable for the teacher to ask the parents to claim compensation, because the doll did not intentionally break the door lock, and the parents should not compensate for it.

Although it is not very reasonable, for the sake of their children's impression at school, parents will generally take the initiative to compensate.

Hua Hua opened the door at school, the lock was broken, and the teacher asked the parents to claim compensation, I want to ask. Does that make sense? I think. Doll unlocks the door at school. If it is broken, the teacher will ask the parents to claim compensation. It's unreasonable, and it's okay if it's a child who deliberately breaks it.

Of course, this is reasonable, but if you want to rule out one reason, it is whether the lock was broken by your child, or whether the lock was broken in the first place.

If it was a child who deliberately caused damage, I think the claim is reasonable. If not, I still think it's unreasonable.

This is a public facility issue, and I think it should be the whole class to accompany it, because the child is only responsible for opening the door, but the door lock is broken, and the child should not be responsible.

If the doll opens the door normally but the door lock is broken, this situation should not be compensated by the parents.

You should first ask your child what is going on, and then negotiate with the teacher at school, but in order for the child not to be embarrassed by the school teacher, it is best to compensate.

This depends on the situation, and I think we need to make a judgment based on the reason for what happened! But many times children make mistakes, and parents should pay for it!

The school is a place of consumption, students spend money, what kind of lock can be broken, it is not the student who destroys, and it is not the same thing for students to lose money to the place.

Reasonable, or unreasonable, depending on the situation.

It's not destruction, it's possible to touch porcelain.

If the child accidentally breaks the classroom door at school, the teacher asks the parents, how should the parents tell the teacher?

If the child accidentally breaks the classroom door at school, parents should contact the teacher in time, explain the situation and apologize to the teacher, and express their willingness to bear the cost of repair. It can be expressed in one or more of the following ways:1

Submit a repair plan: "We have found the repairman related to the door, they have analyzed and given a repair plan, and we have contacted the repair time." ”4.

The child accidentally locks the school door, which is the child's own responsibility. Children should respect the school's rules and do not operate the school's doors and windows, especially not locking them. Although the child has no intentions, it is still his responsibility.

At the same time, schools have responsibilities. The school should regularly check the use of doors and windows, and publicize the child's condition, so that the child can know the correct way to use the doors and windows, as well as precautions, to prevent such incidents.

In addition, parents have responsibilities as well. Parents should give their children the right guidance not to operate the doors and windows of the school without permission, especially not to lock the doors to avoid accidents.

In short, if the child accidentally locks the school door, the child himself is the most responsible, but the school and parents are also responsible for fulfilling their respective responsibilities.

It depends on the specifics of the situation. If the child himself locks the school door, the child should bear the responsibility for the filial piety; If the school itself does not lock the door and make it bright, the school is responsible.

If the school door lock is broken, whether the student needs to lose money depends on the school's regulations and the specific situation.

Often, if the school door lock is damaged because the student is using it incorrectly, or if the student violates the school's rules, the student may be held responsible. In this case, the student may be required to reimburse the school for the cost of repairing or replacing the door lock.

However, if the damage to the door lock is caused through no fault of the student, but is caused by natural causes or other non-student causes, the student is usually not liable for compensation. At this time, the school should be responsible for dealing with the problem of the damaged door lock and repairing or replacing the door lock.

In short, whether the student needs to bear the responsibility of compensating the high school for the damage of the door lock needs to be judged according to the actual situation and the relevant regulations of the school. Students are advised to follow the school's rules and communicate with the school to understand the specific situation and solutions when they encounter similar problems.