What is the correct criterion for evaluating right and wrong, good and evil

This standard comes from the worldview and outlook on life.

Therefore, different worldviews and outlooks on life lead to different standards of good and evil.

What is the most correct view of the world, the outlook on life?

This problem led to the birth of hundreds of schools of thought, three religions and nine streams.

Each faction puts forward its own point of view and believes that its own point of view is the most correct.

What is the most correct world outlook and outlook on life? Only you can judge for yourself, there is no absolute rule, automatically judge these things well, and hand over a ready-made answer to you.

Confucianism's right and wrong, good and evil, is the three outlines and five constants, and the morality of a gentleman.

The right and wrong of Buddhism, good and evil, is measured by the amount of interest arrogance, to do one thing, if there is only benefit, that is good, if there are advantages and disadvantages, but the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, it is still good. If it does more harm than good, it is evil. But when it comes to weighing the pros and cons, it is necessary to have strong analytical skills.

The standards of good and evil for the other factions are not clear.

Is that faction's standard good? This needs to be thought about and recognized by yourself.

But when choosing ideas, we should discard all preconceptions, so that we can be objective and fair.

From a social point of view, everyone has their own standards in their hearts, but people are good and bad, and the standards are different. Therefore, the average degree of social acceptance (public morality) should be used as the evaluation criterion for good and evil in this society.

Corresponding to the true nature is good, and contrary to the true nature, it is evil.

You are the standard.

Everyone has a balance in their hearts.

You need to constantly judge others to adjust your balance.

In the end, it becomes the standard of right and wrong in your heart.

It can only be the whole Bible.

John 14:6c And Jesus said unto them, I am the way, and the truth, and the life. If not through me. No one can come to the Father.

Why bother with such a thing......Standards vary by generation, by person, by cognition.

The core of good and evil is nothing more than profit. And this interest can be divided into three levels.

The first is the human being's time of existence. Doing: The more we can prolong the existence of human beings, the better; The shorter the human being, the more evil it becomes.

The second is the world (including things and outsiders). Doing: The more beneficial to the world, the better; The more harmful it is to the world, the more evil it is.

Finally, there is the ego. What you do: the more beneficial you are, the better you are; The more harmful it is to oneself, the more evil it becomes.

Of course, the above is about good and evil, but the heart of good and evil is different.

If evil deeds are done with good intentions (i.e., evil deeds with good intentions), then things are evil and hearts are good; If one does a good deed out of malice (such as seeking something in return), then the deed is good and the heart is evil.

In addition, good and evil also involve personal abilities: the more you try to do good, or try to reduce evil, the better your heart will be; The more recklessly we do evil, or the more we intend to do good, the more evil our hearts become.

The evaluation of good and evil behavior is called "ethical and moral evaluation", that is, the moral evaluation of behavior, judging whether it is "good" or "bad", and whether it conforms to moral norms and value standards. Ethics and moral evaluation are generally based on moral philosophy and ethics, and have a certain theoretical basis and ideological guidance. In social life, ethical and moral evaluation is often used to regulate and guide people's behavior, and it is also one of the important criteria for examining a person's moral character.

The standard of good and evil is also known as the "moral standard". It refers to the criterion of judging and evaluating people's behavior, good and evil, honor and disgrace, or according to the question of moral standards, there are various opinions in the history of ethics: some take "righteousness" as the standard for judging the good and evil of behavior (Confucius, Dong Zhongshu, Zhu Bao, etc.); There are two reasons why some people regard knowledge and ideas as the criterion for judging good and evil is motivation.

First, good and evil are people's subjective cognition, and evaluating good and evil from the subjective will of motive is more in line with the category of good and evil. The sages of the past dynasties are trapped in whether human nature is inherently good or evil, and there is still no answer to the search for thousands of years, but the supreme ascension rarely tells the world one thing, good and evil cannot be objective.

Bodhisattvas fear causes, and ordinary people fear results. Ordinary people pay attention to results, and bodhisattvas pay attention to intentions. Enlightened people can focus on the process and not care about the result, but it is difficult for people who are not enlightened to do so.

Living in the present is actually about paying attention to the process and enjoying the process, but it is easier said than done.

Bodhisattvas (enlightened beings) know that there must be causes and effects, and that the effect will become the cause, and the cycle of cause and effect is continuous, and if you grasp the cause (state of mind), you will know the effect.

Bodhisattvas attach great importance to the state of mind (motivation), and the standard for distinguishing between good and evil is the intention. Good is good, and evil is evil, not the result.

The standard for distinguishing good from evil is very different from that of people who practice enlightenment.

Ordinary people pay attention to the result, the result is good, and the result is good, and the result is evil.

There is a very big difference between people's thinking and understanding between practicing and not practicing, before and after enlightenment.

Spiritual practice is about changing one's thoughts and behaviors. Thinking that you have made a mistake and correcting your mistakes by following the example of a saint is practice.

If you fix yourself, it will affect the family and society. It seems to correct itself, but in fact, it is to transform the world.

Many people want to influence the world, but the way to do so is different.

Smart people only want to change others, only want others to change, and are unwilling to change themselves, which is the main thing in human suffering.

Awakened people change themselves, because they take the initiative to change, so the more they change, the happier they are, the more they change, the stronger their self-confidence, and the greater their contribution to society.

To live in the moment is to be focused and focused. No matter what you do, you do it very carefully and without distractions.

For example, when writing, concentrate on the writing itself, don't think about what others will think after the article is written, don't think about what fame and fortune the article can bring to you, and focus on expressing yourself.

When I do it, I am very engaged, that is, I am fully involved. When you're done, you don't think about it, you just let it go. If you understand this truth, everything you do is a practice, and you will do well.

Don't be afraid to think wrong, don't be afraid to do wrong. Dare to write what others have not written, and dare to write what you have not written.

Some people repeat others and themselves every day. Some people are surpassing others and surpassing themselves every day.

Embark on the road of innovation, the more you write, the newer you write, and the wider the road.

The secret of success is not to be afraid of failure, and the secret of innovation is not to be afraid of making mistakes.

One more failure, one closer to success. One more mistake is one more new discovery. Failure is success, and making mistakes is creation.

The only criterion for judging is the right and wrong of their own actions, good and evil. What do you mean.

Morality is judged by good and evil, and moral standards are also called "good and evil standards.""It refers to judging and evaluating the right and wrong of people's behavior, the measure of good and evil, honor and disgrace, or according to the issue of moral standards, morality is one of the social ideologies. Only moral principles and norms that conform to the laws of social development and the interests of the broadest masses of the people are the objective and scientific criteria for judging good and evil behaviors, and they are the standards of humanitarian morality.