Ask for an opening statement for a debate competition, and our debate topic is ,,, real talent is mo

Of course, it is more important to do than to say, but practice is the most important. A few tips for you. Isn't talking on paper a good example?

If you just talk about it without actually doing it, you won't succeed! Do you see a man who walks the world with one mouth? Even if there is, his success is not down-to-earth, and one day he will fall off a cliff Let's take the debate tournament as an example Some people may say that the debate tournament is said by mouth, but is this a fact?

I have also experienced that it is impossible to successfully debate without prior preparation, so prior preparation is practice, that is, doing, isn't it? Moreover, every celebrity, their successful experience tells us a truth: success is done with both hands!

Success is made with hard work. Let's read English and talk about things! If you want to learn English well, just by talking about it&uot;If I want to succeed, I want to learn English well&uot;You've learned it well, is this realistic???

Only if you continue to practice listening, speaking, reading and writing can you make progress, so, of course, doing is more important than speaking.

Finally, I wish you success! Come on, because this Friday, I also have a debate competition topic about the teacher occupying the class, if you are interested, come and give me a trick, my question is "debate master, please come in, should the teacher occupy the subclass" Come in and give me some ideas!! Thank you.

It can be said that Zhao Kuo's idiom of talking on paper is the most historically good but useless example...

Summary. Everyone knows the battle of Changping, Qin and Zhao, both of which were the most powerful countries at the end of the Warring States Period, it can be said that only Zhao can compete with Qin for the world, but as a result, Zhao appointed Zhao Kuo, who can only talk on paper, this person is full of theories, and has read a lot of books, but in the end, the final battle of Changping was lost, and Zhao has no ability to confront Qin since then.

In the debate competition, we are the opponent, and our point of view is that practice is more important than theory, and we urgently ask for a debate, thank you.

Approximate number of words.

A two-minute argument.

Ok, my point of view is that practice is more important than theory, right?

Well. It's the opposite.

I am the opposing side of the three arguments, and my practice of TV is more important than theory, so I will give you an example.

That's it up front.

A debate. You can change it to a debate.

Then what is the point of view that makes the opponent believe it?

Instance. Everyone knows the battle of Changping, Qin and Zhao, both of which were the most powerful countries at the end of the Warring States Period, it can be said that only Zhao can compete with Qin to compete for the world, and Zhao appointed Zhao Kuo, who can only talk on paper, this person is full of theories, and has read a lot of books, but in the end, after the most stupid battle of Changping, he lost, and Zhao has no ability to confront Qin since then.

There are many such examples in history, so it is said that practice is more important than theory, and it is necessary to learn to be flexible, not only theoretical, not flexible.

Can it not? Eat whales] [eat whales].

1. Edison, Newton, Van Gogh, etc., you can take a closer look at the biographies of these celebrities. Many people in foreign countries are regarded as geeks, and there are only them, and why they are called geeks is because they act abnormally, but they are not abnormal, but they are not accepted by the world (interpersonal relationships are not good). Really accomplished people are better than ordinary people, and their thinking must be different from ordinary people, of course, interpersonal relationships are not good.

Chen Jingrun of China. There are many more in China. The so-called interpersonal relationship is also a kind of ability, can you name any people who will not succeed only on interpersonal relationships?

You can't! And when we look at the world, we can see people everywhere who rely on real talent and learning to leave a name for eternity! Even the little Bush family has the ability!

Dude, right?

2. I think it's not that interpersonal relationships aren't important, but that interpersonal relationships themselves need real talent to learn, and it's a course that needs to be learned.

Interpersonal relationships lack real talent and learning, just like duckweed floating on the water, which can stay in every position on the water, but every position cannot take root.

Interpersonal relationships can only provide a chance, if there is no talent to learn, the most relatives will not keep you, on the contrary, often make the relationship embarrassing in the end, no practical learning can only be a momentary courage, of course, there is strength to be competitive, there is a relationship in the strength of course is the best, because the strength can get the greatest trust to play, give you the opportunity to prove in advance, but it doesn't matter that you can only rely on strength, solid strength is fundamental, because there may be strength in the work to develop relationships.

3. If a person does not have real skills, even if he has a good interpersonal relationship, it will not be tenable. Interpersonal relationships are established by one's own more contact and communication, if there is no real talent to learn, what to use to communicate with others, unless interpersonal relationships are established by sycophants, shouldn't it? If you don't have real talent and you can't do anything, who else will cooperate with you, and then there will be no interpersonal relationships to talk about.

If you don't have real talent and real learning, it will be difficult to integrate into this social family, and if you can't integrate into this society, you will not be able to establish good interpersonal relationships.

4. The importance of real talent and real learning lies in the fact that real talent and real learning is a guarantee. A person with real talent and learning may encounter all kinds of difficulties, but he can rely on his own ability and hard work to get out of this predicament and live his true colors. But if you don't have real talent and real learning, then when you encounter a predicament, you can only passively rely on and beg others - whether others will give you face again, it is difficult to say.

The importance of real talent and real learning lies in the fact that real talent and real learning is a kind of self. Real talent will not run away, it is always in your body, hands, heart, when you need it, you can use it handily, you can make it useful for you - although it may not have an immediate effect. And "interpersonal relationships" are unstable, they come when there are interests, run when there are no interests, come when they are happy, and disappear when they share hardships - they really can't be counted on.

Although ability is also important, ability is an internal thing, which cannot be seen from the outside, so why so many companies need to look at academic qualifications, there is no way to do it.

You say you have the ability, how do I believe it, how do you make me believe it, the ability is seen by work practice, who do I give a job opportunity to now??? You would say, to those who have the ability. But who is capable?

I can't see it from just one side.,As a last resort.,I can only give the job opportunity to someone who has the ability (not someone who is necessarily capable, because I can't judge the ability).。。

Therefore, it has caused the current fact that looking for a job depends on academic qualifications and educational background.

Because I can't directly judge who is capable at once, and people with a good educational background have a high probability of being capable, of course, not so absolutely.

Looking at academic qualifications and educational background is also the most direct and efficient means for the personnel department to select talents.

For an unfamiliar applicant, a Ph.D. from Tsinghua University is always more capable than a person who didn't graduate from high school???

Now, academic qualifications are important, but more importantly, your educational background, that is, you graduated from that school, because there are more and more people with high academic qualifications,,, so in order to choose the best ,,, school background is also a bargaining chip in the competition.

Education, good educational background, just like a person's appearance. Do you say that people are handsome, beautiful and useful??? It's definitely useful, it's definitely good, it's good-looking, it's useful for everything you do.

Wouldn't it be better if you were good looking, capable, and kind?

People who say that their looks are not important are either hypocritical people, and if they want to leave, they are ugly people. People who are not good-looking will say that looks are not important. The heart is important, and the appearance is also important.

Education is like a person's appearance, and ability is like a person's heart. Both are important, and the importance of appearance is sometimes higher than that of the heart, because people often judge people by their appearance!

What are the prerequisites and fundamental guarantees to ensure that the goals can be achieved smoothly and efficiently?

I won't tell you what basic information you want to prepare to check, I ask you directly, you can also ask yourself, what is the academic qualification, is an experience, what is the experience for you, what is more important to you, what is more important to the employer, for you, the experience of the perception of what moves your heart is important, but for the people who need your ability, the ability behind your academic qualifications is more important, and the academic qualifications are interpreted differently by different people. If you don't have a background for this debate, you have to set a background for yourself. Academic qualifications are a certificate, what these pieces of paper can give us, a certificate given by a third person, just like the guarantee of a bank loan, whether the credibility of the person is more important or the guarantee is more important, it goes without saying.

Look through the substance, see the actual effect, and don't be affected by everyone's comments.

In the second debate, you should have sharp teeth, quick reaction, quick thinking, good at attacking, quick wit, and find the loopholes in the opponent's debate. Again, I would like to reiterate my point of view.

Saying is more important than doing, this is the positive view, how do you think the positive side will make a statement? This argument is not good for the positive side, because it does not change the objective existence in any way. The opposing side should be good at taking advantage of it.

The other person may emphasize that both saying and doing are important, but saying is more important than doing. But what's the matter? Say, show the intention of doing it, so as to better cohesion, so that the team can better understand, so that it is easy to execute.

If we don't make it clear, we won't have a goal to strive for, and it will not be conducive to the development of action.