During the epidemic, which subway is more likely to be infected with the virus than the bus? 130

Metro, during the epidemic, the subway has a large number of passengers, and the subway has a large passenger capacity. And the bus has a small space but a small passenger capacity, so the subway is more likely.

Subways and buses are also likely to be infected with the virus, because subways and buses are crowded places, so they are more likely to be infected.

The infectious subway is larger, one is airtight than the car, the air is not circulated, and the two passengers are more likely to be infected. During the pandemic, try not to go to crowded places.

Subway, confined environment, underground air conditioning to provide air, can only continue to transport air, can not exhaust the internal gas, which makes the formation of a closed environmental space, so that the possibility of infection is greater than the bus, the bus allows to open the window, can form an air flow to a certain extent, reduce the possibility of infection.

It also depends on whether people keep a safe distance between themselves. However, the bus can be ventilated, and the subway is a closed environment, which may be relatively more dangerous.

If the disinfection treatment is not sufficient, the possibility of the subway is relatively large, and the amount of subway and bus is very large, but in comparison, the subway is closed, but there is no need to worry too much.

It's better to take the bus, because the buses are mostly local passengers, and the passengers on the subway are a little more complicated.

During the first line. In general, definitely. The warmth of the subway will be a little greater, because there are too many people on the subway boat. All of them will be faster.

The possibility of infection on buses and subways is too great! So consider buying a mountain bike! Ride to work! (Since you're scared).

I think it's the subway, because compared to the bus, the subway comes and goes, and the bus is a little bit more crowded.

During the epidemic, where is the bus less susceptible to infection? It would be nice to know sooner, don't be careless.

The subway because of the crowds. Ha ha.

Healthy and happy every day!

Now the subway and buses are disinfected every day, and the number of people on board is limited, and many people don't go out much, so it is safer to wear masks and do a good job of protection when traveling.

The two should be about the same, both are confined space environments. Buses travel on land and may be safer if the windows are open for ventilation. The subway generally runs in the underpass, and ventilation should be carried out through the air supply system.

After the lockdown of Wuhan on January 23, all subway and bus services were suspended. It was not until April 8 that the lockdown was gradually lifted. And all subway buses are fully disinfected.

Therefore, Wuhan is now the safest city. If we say that before the lockdown, I think it was the subway that contracted the virus. Because there is less time for ventilation.

Bus bar, because there are not many cities with a subway, which is in general. However, the air circulation of the subway is not as good as that of the bus, and the demand for the subway is high in densely populated cities like Beijing. Therefore, this problem mainly depends on the **, there is no absolute.

Hello! I feel the same. The buses are relatively well ventilated and can have a small space.

The ventilation of the subway must not be as good as that of land, but it can be relatively safe if it is sanitized well. In fact, as long as we do our own security protection, it is most feasible to isolate the virus.

are all susceptible to infection, and the subway is a little more dangerous in comparison.

Buses are more susceptible to viruses!

Judging from the current epidemic, it is not easy, wear a mask.

During the epidemic, in fact, the passenger flow of the subway and the bus is very large, so it is dangerous to compare with either one, and if you want to be safe, unless you can't do it or take a taxi alone, the probability of the subway and the bus is almost the same.

The subway is safer! Because the people who take the subway are generally regular passengers, the journey is longer. The bus gets on and off too often.

Relatively speaking, buses are ventilated and should be safer. It's okay to go out less, and the home is the safest.

Buses are comparatively safer. Because of personal experience, there are no more than six people in a car. The subway personnel are more concentrated, and there is more contact in and out of the station.

Buses are safer, subways are more dangerous.

If you don't have to, it's better not to go out.

Personally, I think it's all the same, but be sure to do a good job of protection, wear a mask and gloves when you go out.

It depends on the number of people, and we try to choose a small number of people, but we must wear a mask.

There's nothing to analyze, it's all public transport with a mask.

Personally, I don't think it's very safe, but we have to take the bus or subway for life or work, so we must wear gloves, wear masks, keep a distance between people, don't talk to each other, and wash our hands after getting home.

During the epidemic, you need to wear a mask when you go out to a large number of places, and the subway and bus are not very safe.

Personally, I think the bus is safer, after all, its seats are empty, of course, as long as you do a good job of protective measures, wear a mask, wash your hands frequently, in fact, you can sit anywhere.

During the epidemic, it is safer to go out of the subway and public transportation, and public transportation is not so closed after all.

Buses are relatively safe. And the subway space is too closed.

Personal opinion.

1.The bus bar, the bus has seats, and they are all separated from people.

2.There are no subway seats.

It's all public transportation, and it's all in a confined space. Anyway, you bring your mask and go out. I think Wei Xiangqing is about the same!

I think in terms of safety, the bus is slightly better, because the bus window can be ventilated and the window can be opened. The subway is a confined space.

Compared with these two modes of transportation, I personally think that the subway is more risky, after all, compared to buses, the air circulation line is not so good.

Which one is dangerous, in short, which vehicle to choose, please bring your mask and a small bottle of disinfectant, always remember to wear your mask in a place with the highest amount, use your small bottle of disinfectant in the place where you have touched, your own safety is the safety of the whole family

.There are more people in the subway and quite a lot in the bus. I think the bus is safe.

It's all about the same, it is recommended to wear a mask, and it is best not to go out if there is nothing important.

During the epidemic, the bus is more dangerous than the subway. Because of the limited space in the bus compartment, the distance between people is also limited, and a safe distance cannot be achieved. Moreover, the compartment has good airtightness, which is not conducive to air circulation.

In the case of the subway, it has a large space, the distance between people can be stretched to achieve a safe distance, and the air flow is good, so compared to the bus, the subway will be safer.

Subway bar! If there are fewer people, the bus will be better ventilated than the subway.

I think depending on the area, both the bus and the subway are about the same.

It's not safe: As long as there are many people, it's not safe to be so close.

1.Partition seats.

2.In the process of doing it, you will not encounter a large number of **.

3.There is only one trip, there are few seats, and the number of people is relatively fixed.

In fact, it is not safe in a closed space with many people, so it is safer to do a good job of protection, wash your hands frequently, and take your temperature daily.

A few days ago, the joint prevention and control mechanism held a number of press conferences in a row to answer the popular science questions about epidemic prevention and control that netizens are concerned about. <>

Almost, they are all confined spaces, people are still changing frequently, and the point where the bus opens the window is negligible.

The subway has done a lot of measures in terms of epidemic prevention and control, and also has a ventilation system, which is safer than the bus from a safety point of view.

During the pandemic, it is inevitable that taking the subway is more dangerous than the bus.

Is the subway itself underground, and the windows cannot be opened for ventilation, while the bus can be ventilated, so naturally the risk of the bus will be a little less.

Comparatively speaking, the subway is more dangerous than the bus.

I think it should be the subway, the amount of buses is not as large as the subway, and the bus is outdoors, and the windows can be opened for ventilation when the people on the bus are dense, but the subway is large and the space is limited, and the air circulation is poor. Therefore, relatively speaking, there are more people in the subway, and the buses are safer.

Subway, subway carriages can accommodate more people than buses, bus waiting time is too long, the general audience will choose the subway to travel, bus travel may be more inclined to the elderly nearby to buy groceries.

In the morning of big cities during the epidemic, compared with buses, there should be more buses than buses, because buses can open windows to ventilate and the risk is smaller.

Subway, because the subway is fast, the space is also large, and the air circulation is relatively good

It should be that there are more people in the subway.