A few small questions in history, about some problems in history

I don't know if you want to listen to the official answer according to the authoritative Marx's theory of historical materialism in China or if you want to hear other opinions, if you want to hear the official answer, please refer to the upstairs, I guess you will be interested in different voices.

1.The success of the October Revolution in one night shows that there is little resistance, and why the resistance is small shows that he made a major compromise, that is, the popular elections were held immediately after the victory of the "revolution".

2.There are two kinds of reforms, top-down and bottom-up, Martin Luther can die well, which shows that he has the support of others, at that time, there were many countries in the German national region, and the church and secular state forces fought with each other, and some vassal states provided protection to Martin Luther at this time, using Martin Luther to oppose the church forces, for details, please refer to the fourth episode of the first season of the German documentary film "The Germans", "Luther and the Nation".

Varies from country to country. Different countries have different national conditions, and if the conditions are met, the revolution will break out in an instant.

Reforms do not have to be top-down, and some reforms have the support of the people and also need a mass base.

1.The social conditions of the time dictated.

2. Martin Luther created a three-legged trend of Protestantism, Catholicism, and Orthodoxy. The church also resisted, but there was also resistance and help from the British royal family that allowed Martin Luther to escape. For details, see the book "Major Reforms in the History of the Hunan Edition".

1.I don't know.

2.Because no matter how small the territory is. People are still Chinese, and although they occupy the land, it is impossible to kill the Chinese people, so China will not be destroyed.

For example, the Qing Dynasty Manchus destroyed the Ming Dynasty. But it's still China, and all the ethnic groups in China are fighting, and there are no foreigners, how can they be wiped out?

3.I don't know.

4。People have been killed by opium, and the Chinese think they are strong. The Qing Dynasty is known as the country laid on horseback.

And for the first reason for foreign tribute, there are two reasons. 1, the emperor does not know the power of **. 2. If a large number of people use and produce the ** tribute of small countries, how can there be a big Qing face.

5.Cixi is a hexarian who does not care about the country, only about herself.

There are so many questions, you don't give a penny, hey, I don't want to type.

This is an exam question: the original question is: It can be said that this is a political question better than a history question. And the point of view is wrong. 37 "In the process of social development, the masses of the people are the 'dramatists' of history, and the heroes are the 'playwrights' of history."

a.Historical Idealist Perspectives bHistorical Dialectical Perspective.

c.Historical Materialist Perspectives dHistorical determinist perspectives.

Proposition Analysis] The knowledge points assessed in this question are: the role of the masses and heroes in social development.

This argument sets the masses of the people against the heroes and runs counter to the basic principle of historical materialism, that the masses of the people are the creators of history. As the decisive force of history, it should be said that the masses of people are both historical"People in the play", and historical"Playwright"。Historical materialism does not deny the important role of heroes in the creation of history, but heroes are all created and emerged in the practice of the masses, and their historical role must be closely integrated with the practice of the masses and become history together with the masses of the people"People in the play"and historical"Playwright"。

Heroes will achieve nothing if they are detached from the masses. This view in the stem separates the two, exaggerates the role of the hero, and is therefore an idealist view of history. Therefore, the correct answer to this question is option A.

This sentence is one-sided, heroic tasks play a role in advancing and delaying history, and it cannot be said that history is created by heroic figures.

History is made by the people! Without the people, heroes are heroes.