Who is to blame for quitting smoking? Do you support quitting smoking for all?

Support the people of Quanjing to quit smoking.

Tobacco can damage almost all organs in the body, and quitting smoking can effectively stop or delay the progression of smoking-related diseases. Studies have found that the risk of death in patients with coronary heart disease is reduced by about half after 1 year of quitting smoking, and it continues to decrease with the extension of quitting time, and the absolute risk of death in patients with coronary heart disease will be similar to that of people who have never smoked after 15 years of quitting;

Smoking cessation and prevention of secondhand smoke exposure are the most important means for the prevention and treatment of COPD, and smoking cessation is the only proven way to effectively delay the progressive decline of lung function. Smoking cessation also reduces morbidity and mortality from stroke, peripheral vascular disease, pneumonia, and gastric and duodenal ulcers. Therefore, quitting smoking is an important part of various smoking-related diseases.

I am particularly supportive of quitting smoking for all.

Smoking, itself is your own business, others have no right to say anything, but if you smoke, this matter affects other ** different. It affects the health of others, and I heard that secondhand smoke is even more harmful than third-hand smoke. And those who smoke a lot, and the breath that comes out of their mouths and hands are third-hand cigarettes.

I think maybe my life is too idealistic, I think this kind of thing is not good for the body, not good for the environment, not good for anything, why should I have him even if sometimes it is to refresh myself? There are also corresponding alternatives, and there will definitely be foods or corresponding measures that do not harm the body, but can also bring this effect and effect.

One thing that comes to mind is that the tax paid on this tobacco is still very high every year. Probably, the state is considering the development of this economy, so it does not say that it is completely and completely banned. So, if our country says that the development is comprehensive enough, and there is no need to pay taxes or have other particularly good national industries, then I think that this smoking, maybe the state will stop it even more.

Hello, I am a supporter of quitting smoking for all, because on all tobacco sales boxes will be written that smoking is harmful to health, so how to quit smoking is a very good thing. The following aspects:

The first is that quitting smoking is conducive to the development of our body in a better direction. Because it is written on the cigarette box that smoking is still healthy, this is a real thing. Excessive smoking may have an impact on our respiratory and lung functions.

So quitting smoking is a good thing. At the same time, it is good for my health and reduces a lot of expenses.

Second, if all the people quit smoking, then our whole world, or the whole country will become a silent place, if smoking, more or less second-hand smoke, may also infect some diseases, or cause adverse effects on the body, then if we say, smoke-free, then our whole people, at least in this area, are very healthy.

Thirdly, I support quitting smoking because I am also a smoker at the moment, and I am also thinking about quitting, and then I can save one. At the same time, the body will get better, walk a little harder, and then have the idea of quitting smoking.

I'm very much in favor of quitting smoking for all, because:

1.The nicotine and other harmful substances in the smoke can cause certain damage to the lungs and oral cavity when inhaled into the lungs, and in serious cases, it can also lead to lung cancer, throat cancer, and oral cancer;

2. The harm of second-hand smoke is not less than that of direct smoking, and inhalation of second-hand smoke will increase the incidence of chronic diseases, especially for pregnant women and children;

3. Smoking can also cause cardiovascular system diseases, such as coronary heart disease;

4. Smoking will also lead to a decrease in appetite and anorexia, which is not good for the health of the body in the long run, so it is necessary to quit smoking as soon as possible. Therefore, for the sake of my own health and the health of those around me, I support the whole population to quit smoking.

Smokers vs. non-smokers.

For the sake of health, I support smoking cessation for all.

Smoking is certainly not good.

Second, if the whole population quits smoking, it will definitely affect the country's tax revenue.

However, the impact should be positive rather than negative.

Because, quitting smoking requires a process, the average person from the decision to quit smoking, to quit smoking successfully, at least a few times to a dozen times, and even dozens of times to quit smoking unsuccessfully, and a standard smoking cessation ** process, generally takes three weeks to a month.

During this period, the person who quits smoking may stop smoking, but he will spend the money he saves elsewhere, although the tax rate on other goods and services is certainly not as high as the tobacco tax rate.

Under normal use, it will not cause so much damage caused by tobacco use! So spending money on goods and services that have nothing to do with tobacco should be net for the state.

Many people's answers only see the huge profits and taxes of tobacco, but do not see the huge losses caused by tobacco use, and the profits and taxes and the national fiscal revenue are completely different things, because the profits and taxes include not only the financial revenue brought by tobacco to the country, but also the profits of tobacco itself. Based on the global average, tobacco taxes are $1 per income.

Support the national smoking ban, the whole people quit smoking, smoking has a hundred harms but no benefits, whether it is a great waste of money and health, especially smoking not only endangers their own and their family life and health, second-hand smoke is the health of countless innocent people, it can be said that 90% of the people in the country are against smoking, strongly demand a comprehensive ban on smoking, this is a benefit to the country and the people, for the benefit of generations to come.

People now advocate pollution-free healthy food, vegetables should be green, food is natural without pesticides and fertilizers, drinking water should be pure mountain springs, but the air quality is due to some people uncontrolled, regardless of the occasion of smoking, causing great pollution, resulting in some susceptible people suffering from various respiratory diseases, difficult to eradicate, so that the number of hospital patients increases, medical costs increase, become a malignant soul ring, especially smoking is more harmful to children and women, the elderly, they are inconvenient to move the position, passive smoking is obvious, Deeply affected and have no avoidable measures, only rely on the best strength, rely on the strong constraints of the system, rely on severe punishment, stop some people's bad habits, improve their taste of life and healthy living habits.

They are addicted to smoking, almost unable to extricate themselves, relying on their own strength and will, it is impossible to achieve a fundamental change, only the guidance of the policy, the call of the system, the timely and severe punishment, can gradually eliminate the harm of smoking, so that people can live in a sunny, fresh air, fragrant and fragrant world of flowers.

First of all, the existence of cigarettes has promoted economic development, China has become the world's largest cigarette consumer, the total number of smokers accounts for 1 3 in the world, and the smoking age is developing towards a lower age. It is very common for men, women and children to smoke on the street, but because considering that the current tobacco tax accounts for more than 10% of the income and solves the employment problem of a large number of people, if the whole people quit smoking, it will definitely affect the development of China's national economy and will also lead to the loss of jobs for some people, so it is not supported.

In the tank. Smoking is different from drinking alcohol and eating junk food, because secondhand smoke can actually cause harm to others, while the former is mostly harmful to oneself.

Smokers often know the dangers of smoking, but because most of them deliberately reduce their psychological acceptance of the dangers of smoking, non-smokers, after accepting the publicity, naturally have no good impression of smokers, and even cause conflicts.

But in fact, the harm of smoking is greater than many people think, for example, the junk food, barbecue, etc. you listed, in fact, including smog, car exhaust, etc., are not as harmful as long-term smoking.