To destroy a German tank in World War II, the Russian army or the Allies had to pay a proportion of

During World War II, German tanks were indeed qualitatively superior to Allied or Soviet tanks of the same period, but German tanks had several fatal problems.

First, production capacity. The German tanks were too complex, and mass production was difficult.

Second, poor reliability. Because the German army temporarily ordered the production of more powerful tanks when it found that it could not defeat the T34 after the war, it can be said that the Tiger and Leopard tanks were produced to fight fires, and they were more urgent, and they went to the battlefield before they could solve all the problems, so they caused the weakness of poor reliability. Its complexity is also one of the reasons for its poor reliability.

But in any case, the German tanks gave their opponents a great shock with their excellent armor protection and powerful firepower. As a result, the Allies and Soviets could only use crowd tactics.

However, in the later period, the German tanks also faced many strong opponents. For example, the Allied Sherman Firefly tank and the Soviet Stalin's series were very tricky for German tankers, but this did not affect the important position of German tanks in the history of tank development.

Flutter. Dude, you're the first one I've ever seen that uses a blitzkrieg. The blitzkrieg was not so exaggerated, the Germans fought Poland for a month and France for 42 days, and except for some direct surrenders, none of them were resolved in a day.

The capture of millions of Russian troops is also an exaggeration. As for the Meng army and the Soviet army for so long, the Allies only officially fought against Germany in the later period, and almost the Soviet army was fighting before, but Stalin's purge washed out many excellent officers and generals, plus many elites were lost at the beginning, the Soviet Union and Germany were inseparable on the surface, but the problem of insufficient resources and productivity in Germany had long been exposed.

The number of tanks is determined purely by productivity, as well as the producibility of tanks. The Allies entered the war late, and the Soviet army was not weak, although its military quality was inferior to the German army, but it could not be said to be bad, and the Kwantung Army, which was entrenched in northeastern China, quickly collapsed under the blows of the Soviet Union. Of course, the USSR had an advantage in equipment.

Germany did not declare war on the Soviet Union, and it took the Soviet Union by surprise, and even went to Moscow (although it did not pay attention to Moscow at first, but at least it began in September). The Germans suffered a setback in Moscow, and after that they were largely undefeated in the Great Battle. Germany has basically entered the defensive phase since the Battle of Kursk, and many troops have been used for home defense, and it is inevitable that the Soviets and the Allies will take time.

No matter how good the German tank is, Germany still lost the war and won the best reputation, but lost the entire war.

Advanced ** in order to win the war and appear, if in order to create this ** and consume a lot of resources and eventually lead to defeat directly or indirectly, then in terms of the overall situation, this kind of ** can only bear the burden of failure, is a failed work, and itself German heavy tanks have many problems, in the later stage of the war German tanks in front of the Allies, especially in front of the Soviets Stalin tanks completely lost their armor advantage, these problems are fatal.

In World War II, Germany relied on tanks to fight the war, and although there were several classics of German infantry equipment, they did not have any obvious advantages compared with other countries (Britain and the United States, etc.). If the tanks no longer have an advantage, what will Mr. Mustache do to sweep most of Europe?

Germany** about 10 million (including civilians). The Red Army lost 4 million deaths, mostly captured and died in concentration camps. About 500,000 died in the United States. A million died in the UK. China has 30 million dead, Japan 7 million dead (including civilians).

Germany lost more than 3,000 tanks, the Red Army 1,800, the British 600, the United States 400, the Chinese negligible few, and the Japanese 1,100.

Throughout World War II:

Mark 1, 1493 units.

Mark Type 2, 1856 units.

Mark Type 3, 5,774 units inside.

Mark 4, 8,800 units.

The Mark 5, also known as the Leopard tank, has 6,000 units.

Mark 6, also known as Tiger 1 tanks, 1,347 units.

Mark 6 modification, that is, the King Tiger tank, 492 units.

As of 1941, (at the height of Nazi Germany), the number of tanks: 5,362, the number of aircraft: 11,030.

Note: All of them, including those that are destroyed, put in the warehouse for long dust.

Data ** Reference.

Throughout World War II: Come.

Mark 1, 1493 sources Mark 2, 1856 Mark 3, 5774 Mark 4, 8800 The above is what we often call tanks 1 to 4 Mark 5, that is, Leopard tanks, 6000 Mark 6, that is, Tiger 1 tanks, 1347 Mark 6 tanks, that is, King Tiger tanks, 492 vehicles.

Thank you for the trouble to adopt!

The most excellent is the IS-2, which some Western historians call IS2M, while the Soviet official refers to the 1944 model in the mid-50s with side skirts and external fuel tanks as IS2M.

Whether a tank is excellent or not, the easiest way is to see if it is still in use after the war is over. Is No. 4 excellent obviously not because no one uses him anymore, the Tiger King Tiger is also not good, and the Panther tank was taken home by France, the Czech Republic and other countries for their own use for several years, and the French used the Panther for a long time after the war. And what about the Soviet T3485?

Apparently the Soviets themselves did not use it. The M4 was just as good, and even Israel used it until the Cold War.

However, almost all of the above tanks ceased production after the war, and only IS2MOD 1944 continued to produce on the assembly line until IS7 left the production line. It shows that the Soviets believed that even the T54 could not completely replace the importance of IS2M, and that it has not been replaced with IS3, 4, 5, and 6 also shows that IS2 is better when all things considered.

The most important thing is rocket technology, the later Soviet satellites in the sky and the American moon landing were all developed on the basis of German technology, otherwise how could communications be so developed now.

In addition, modern fighter engine technology is also German, and the world's first jet fighter was invented by the Germans and is the basis for today's advanced fighters.

At present, the technology without intellectual property rights is basically left behind by Germany.

A lot of recklessness 0 0! The best should be rocket technology and electronics technology, 0 0!

Let's talk about the rocket, space and missile industry first, von Braun, the head of the Saturn V rocket of the US lunar landing program, used to develop the German V series missile. There are also jets, and although the United Kingdom and the United States already have similar engine processes, the TA-183 directly inspired the design process of the F-86 and MiG-15. The axial engines of the Soviet Union were more influenced by Germany, and the submarine industry of the United States and the Soviet Union was affected by the XXI class.

The United States robbed the people, the Soviet Union robbed the equipment.

There is a saying that the United States was more clever at that time, and when they caught the Germans, they shipped them to the United States, and took the drawings and books they found with them. When the United States had almost fished out all the German technicians, the Soviet Union reacted and started to act again, and the useful people were almost all fished, leaving Germany with industrial equipment that it had no time to dismantle and transport.

Throughout, the Soviet Union has been inferior to the United States in small and sophisticated areas. For key disciplines such as electronic technology, it has to be said that this was a mistake in strategy at that time.

However, given the political environment of the Soviet Union at that time, even if the Germans were recruited, it is estimated that few would be able to work and study with peace of mind.