Cao Cao s different views, talk about his understanding of Cao Cao

1.Cao Cao commanded the world in the name of the emperor, and also absorbed a large number of talented strategists.

2.Good at using soldiers, the correct advice of strategists.

3.is good at writing, and the son he has cultivated is also talented.

After the fiasco in the Battle of Chibi, Cao Cao was not at a loss, but said with a smile"Now the north is still under my possession"and laughed three times to show his optimism about setbacks.

In"Chen Lin"In one case, Cao Cao did not kill the people who betrayed him, but also wanted to reuse the talented people, which shows that Cao Cao was tolerant.

In Cao Cao's will, he did not mention national affairs, did not say grandiose words, and only talked about some family trivialities, which showed that he was magnificent.

Cao Cao was an outstanding politician, military strategist, writer, poet in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, and a Han Chinese. In terms of politics and military affairs, Cao Cao eliminated many separatist forces, unified most of northern China, and implemented a series of policies to restore economic production and social order, laying the foundation for Cao Wei's statehood.

Cao Cao built water conservancy in the north and solved the problem of lack of military rations, which played a certain role in the recovery of agricultural production. Employing people on the basis of merit, recruiting the middle and lower strata of the landlord class, restraining the strong and strong, and strengthening the centralization of power. The socio-economic development of the areas under his rule has been restored and developed. Fine Art of War, author of "Sun Tzu's Brief Explanation", "Military Book Pick-up", "Mengde's New Book" and other books.

Good poems, such as "Traveling in Artemisia" and "Watching the Sea", express their political ambitions and reflect the suffering life of the people in the late Han Dynasty, with majestic spirit, generosity and sadness. The prose is also clean and tidy. He is the author of "The Collection of Emperor Wu of Wei".

In order to make a reasonable evaluation of historical figures, we must pay specific attention to the following points while adhering to the principle of historical materialism:

1 Specific Historical Context. The background is a big stage for the activities of historical figures, and if the same activities of the characters are in different historical backgrounds, then different evaluations can be made.

2. Determine the evaluation criteria. When we look at a character's activities or actions, we can't be emotional, and we can't think about it only from a moral point of view. Rather, it is necessary to see whether it is conducive to the development of productive forces, social progress, and national unity.

3. Prevent generalizations. It is usually said that no one is perfect, which means that the evaluation of the character should be divided into two and be comprehensive and objective. For historical figures, it is necessary to consider his class and the nature of the times.

4 Overcoming the Heroic Perception of History. Figures who have made achievements in history are created by the times, and at the same time, it is necessary to recognize that the personality characteristics of the characters have a certain influence on things.

5. According to the effective information provided by specific materials, it is necessary to overcome the stereotype and comprehensively analyze the viewpoints of the materials and the relevant knowledge of the teaching materials.

6 The evaluation of historical figures must be based on historical facts, and must not be subjectively assumed or groundless. That is, to evaluate historical figures on the basis of possessing a large number of historical materials.

Let's take the evaluation of Cao Cao as an example to illustrate:

First, it is necessary to pay attention to distinguishing between the image of Cao Cao in literary works and the real Cao Cao in history. In literary works, due to the influence of the "theory of loyalty and treachery" and the idea of "orthodoxy" (correct name), Cao Cao was scandalized and rated as a traitor in troubled times. It is positioned as a "white face" on the theatrical stage.

The problem lies in the fact that literary works are detached from the specific historical environment of the time, and more often use personal feelings as the criterion for evaluating historical figures, which violates the authenticity and objectivity of evaluating historical figures.

The second is to distinguish between "for politics" and "for literature" in Cao Cao's historical acts. Politically, Cao Cao coerced the power of the powerful and the Son of Heaven to order, paid attention to the development of production, acted only by merit, mastered military strategies, and strategized. Literature has opened up a new atmosphere of Chuang'an literature, and his works have been passed down through the ages, such as "Short Song Xing", etc., which have far-reaching meanings.

The third is to distinguish between "orthodox" ideas and the objective or subjective progressiveness of historical figures in China's social progress. The decline and collapse of the Eastern Han Dynasty was not Cao Cao's fault, nor was it Cao Cao's ability to save, and the crime was not in charge, but Cao Cao's war of annexation and annexation certainly brought hardship to the people, which was excessive. The idea of "orthodoxy" cannot be used as a criterion for evaluating historical figures, and only by clearly understanding the role played by historical figures in social development can we correctly evaluate a historical figure.

Fourth, pay attention to Cao Cao's efforts to unify the world, especially the Battle of Chibi. This is premature. The demand for reunification is the progress of history, but it runs counter to historical objectivity, insists on going its own way, and fails to achieve it.

"Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is generally considered to be an official history, so many people think that his authenticity is very high; "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is **, it is literature and art, of course, there can be a lot of fictional components, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is the idea of respecting Liu and degrading Cao, and it is derogatory to Cao Cao, the real Cao Cao is a military strategist, a writer, and a poet. Cao Cao once annotated "The Art of War", and the version of "The Art of War" that is now circulating is Cao Gong's annotation, Cao Cao's literature has a great influence, and the three fathers and sons of the Cao family are very influential in our literary history.

The evaluation of Cao Cao in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is, of course, that the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" should be objective and accurate, but it does not mean that the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" has a fair evaluation of Cao Cao.

You can refer to Cao Cao's "Short Song Xing", which shows his thirst for talent. Cao Cao made great contributions to the north at that time, made great achievements in governing the north, and contributed to the later unification to many extents.

Politician, writer, military strategist.

Cao Cao was fine with the art of war, good at poetry, expressed his political ambitions, and reflected the suffering life of the people in the late Han Dynasty, with majestic spirit, generosity and sadness; The prose is also clean and tidy, opening and prospering Jian'an literature, leaving a valuable spiritual wealth to future generations, known as Jian'an style and bones, Lu Xun commented that it is "the ancestor of transforming articles". At the same time, Cao Cao is also good at calligraphy, especially Gong Zhangcao, and Zhang Huaijun of the Tang Dynasty rated it as a "wonderful product" in "Book Break".

At the same time, Cao Cao's "meritocracy" was also the highlight of the time. Cao Cao employed meritocracy, broke the concept of the clan, recruited the middle and lower class figures of the landlord class, suppressed the strong and strong, and strengthened the centralization of power. The socio-economic development of the areas under his rule has been restored and developed.

Between Emperor Guangwu of the Han Dynasty and Emperor Wen of the Sui Dynasty for 600 years, no one came out on top.