Why did the United States fight Shuria? Why is the United States fighting Syria

This must be helped, if you don't help, not only will China's ** and oil plummet, but other allies will also look down on you, and you will want to cry without tears when you are really alone. The war of the United States is happening in all oil countries, and it is those countries that he has no real power to control, because oil resources are limited, and the country's economic development is a necessity, there is no development without oil, and all the oil is controlled by military means, and it controls the global economy, China's oil demand is growing, which will lead to the first oil market, and the United States, which has always regarded China as an adversary, has long been deliberately trying to suppress China, the South China Sea issue, China's once forbearance and restraint, the United States did not succeed, China's hundreds of billions of big orders allowed the United States to transfer the war, but for the time being, after Australia's U.S. Marines settled, the United States completely surrounded China in the South China Sea, and now it is the Middle East.

Why is the United States fighting SyriaRussia made a tough statement, don't want to run after the fight.

The United States will not directly invade Syria.

Since the end of World War II, the United States has carried out all military operations aimed at invading China. It can be divided into three stages:

The first stage (1945-1949): the support of puppets** and the elimination of democratic regimes.

The second stage (1950-1975): invasion of Korea and Vietnam, invasion of China.

The first two phases need no elaboration.

Phase III (1983): Global Strategic Deployment.

There are two aspects:

First, the army opened a strategic channel for invasion from the Pamirs;

Second, the Navy opened up the Pacific Ocean to enter the Caribbean Sea through the Panama Canal, then entered the North Atlantic Ocean through the Grenada Waterway and the Haitian Waterway, entered the Mediterranean Sea through the Strait of Gibraltar, entered the Red Sea through the Suez Canal, and entered the Indian Ocean through the Gulf of Aden.

Syria is between the two strategic channels of the United States, but it is not on the two strategic channels, for the United States as long as it controls Turkey and Iraq, it is best to control Syria, it does not matter. Therefore, the United States will support **** to engage in sabotage, and even be happy to see **** subvert Syria**, but it will never directly invade Syria in any case.

1. In order to show muscles and maintain beauty.

The hegemon of copying the country is righteous, and by the way, he maintains du

International law, after all, it is very inhumane to use chemicals against civilians in war, and more importantly, Syria has also been caught, which is really unlucky.

2. It is definitely related to oil: by striking Iraq and Libya, the United States has an advantage in buying oil fields in these two countries, which can only be said to be not ugly for the Americans. Sinopec built a refinery only to buy oil and refine it locally, and transporting refined oil products can reduce costs.

But do you know which oil companies are coming from to get the oil you buy? I estimate that most of them are oil companies from European and American countries. Do Chinese oil companies have oil rights in Iraq and Libya?

I don't know.

3. To meet the interests of arms companies.

The above is my little opinion, if it's not right, I hope you don't spray me!

Euro. It's about hitting the euro. Let the money flow to the continental United States.

Why is the United States fighting SyriaRussia made a tough statement, don't want to run after the fight.

Hegemonism, a hooligan relying on his height and strength on the road, does he need a reason to beat someone? What bullshit chemistry ** is an excuse, Syria's chemistry ** is all filmed in a photography studio by the West to support the White Helmets of the Free Army. Is there an axiom in the West?

The United States is standing on the moral high ground, and now that IS is being shouted and beaten by everyone, and there is no one behind it, the United States officially deployed troops in Syria under the pretext of attacking IS. As a matter of fact, we can see at a glance what kind of collusion the United States has with IS.

In the past, when IS was rising, the 800-strong IS army chased the tank division of 20,000 regular troops (trained by the United States), and the personnel of the tank division threw the ** and ran away. The equipment was completely given to IS.

Why is the United States fighting SyriaRussia made a tough statement, don't want to run after the fight.

It's not that Russia and China always oppose the United States, the Middle East is originally the territory of Islam, the United States insists on making a Jewish Israel in the Middle East, and then the Middle East region starts to fight non-stop, the United States keeps muddying the waters, and it is a sovereign country, you know, the Middle East is oil-producing, is the lifeblood of the global economy, it turns out that China's national strength is weak, and the demand for oil is not very high, so it doesn't matter about the Middle East, now it's different, more than half of China's energy is imported from Iraq in the Middle East, A mess in the Middle East will affect China's economy, so we have been seeking stability in the Middle East, the United States is of course not allowed to do this, so you see now China is trying to protect Pakistan and Iran, because with these two countries China can import Iraqi oil from the land pipeline safely and at low cost, and China has a lot of high-profit business in the Middle East, how to say, foreigners say that Chinese are only interested in doing business, this is no exaggeration, no one wants to go to that place, only Chinese used to do business, As for Russia, his Black Sea Fleet has a port in Syria, and Syria buys a lot of equipment from Russia, and there is a major one, that is, both China and Russia are protecting Iran, Syria is a buffer, if Syria falls, then Iran will be below, and if Iran falls again, then Russia and China will be driven out of the Middle East, China's oil will be gone, the economy will collapse rapidly, and it will directly threaten the security of the CIS.

I've been thinking about this question for a long time, we have to look at the evidence first.

The evidence now has the following: 1 US lawmakers said that Obama did not test any evidence that it was in the interests of the United States to attack Syria. From this, it can be seen that the problem lies with Obama, and the congressman is confused.

Since it is Obama, we must analyze Obama.

Obama said that the military in Syria must be authorized by Congress, but members of Congress do not know why he is sending troops. And Obama believes that it is in the interests of the United States to send troops to Syria.

What exactly is in Syria that can be in the interests of the United States, I can't think about it, and my answer is that there is no at all.

But I finally thought of it, the euro. Syria is a Mediterranean country, very close to Europe. The United States attacked Syria in order to return funds to the United States, and the fundamental purpose was to hit the euro.

Let the money think that Europe is not safe, and if they are going to find a safe haven, they can only come to the United States, because the United States is the safest.

The ultimate goal is to destroy the euro.

The first is to consume some munitions, increase the operating rate of the US arsenal, and increase the employment rate; The second is oil, which is also the most important reason.

It is not possible to do without interests, and it is not enough to have interests alone. Fighting and fighting are nothing more than the above two items.

Lack of money, **research and development** must be useful.

Since the United States suspects Syria of private nuclear research**.

You. Are you a month? Together at home,

The reasons are as follows: **[Seven points to say].

1.Ensure the stability of the petrodollar and maintain the foundation of US hegemony. I think that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan did shake the stability of the American petrodollar in the short term, but because the Soviet Union itself had sunset, it could not control Afghanistan for a long time, but dragged itself down.

The situation in the fight against Syria today is basically the same, that is, to maintain the hegemony of the dollar.

2.Prevent the formation of an arc of "Shiites". If the United States does not intervene in Syria, then in the future, Russia and the ** army will smoothly eliminate the remaining opposition militants in the Eastern Ghouta region, then since then the arc of "Shiism" has been formally formed, and then it will fight Israel by supporting Palestine, and further defeat the United States' staunch ally in the Middle East, second, Turkey is currently standing with Russia and Iran, and NATO's pressure on Russia in the south will be weakened. If Syria is abandoned, the initiative will be lost strategically.

3.Strike at Russia's living space and prevent Russia from taking back Ukraine. Looking back, we can know that Russia sent troops to Syria in exchange for Ukraine, and in a sense, Ukraine may be more important.

However, the United States and NATO do not want to lose Ukraine, so the two sides have been in a stalemate, and this attack on Syria is also to further force Russia to submit and compress Russia's strategic space.

4.Article** [Seven Points to Say], you can pay attention to this, there are a lot of analytical things on it, not bad, quite profound.

Why is the United States fighting SyriaRussia made a tough statement, don't want to run after the fight.

The United States is relatively strong, and Syria will beat him if it is disobedient, so we are glad that we can be so stable in one of the top two countries, and salute the dead warriors and leaders