Has Einstein s theory of relativity been fully verified by now?

To put it simply, the general theory of relativity, founded by Albert Einstein more than a hundred years ago, is a theory of gravity that describes the gravitational action of celestial bodies in the universe. The special theory of relativity is a new theory of straight space-time proposed by Albert Einstein in 1905 entitled "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies", which is different from Newton's view of space-time. "Narrow" means that it applies only to inertial frames of reference.

So how is the theory of relativity verified? It's simple in theory and, of course, proven in practice.

The theory of relativity is divided into special relativity and general relativity, and a very important point in the special theory of relativity is the principle of time dilation, which has to be verified, and the GPS positioning system we use every day is the best verification!

There is also the special theory of relativity's description that mass and energy are the same thing, and the two can be converted into each other, which is well illustrated by the conversion of mass into energy by losing mass in nuclear fusion!

The verification of the general theory of relativity is relatively long, but it has also been verified, from the precession of Mercury's perihelion, to the bending of light rays through massive celestial bodies, as well as the discovery of black holes and gravitational waves, all of which have effectively verified the correctness of general relativity!

Today, the theory of relativity has become one of the cornerstones of modern physics, the other being quantum mechanics. The theory of relativity rules our macroscopic world, and it will be even more pronounced at high speeds and strong gravitational pulls.

However, because our world is in a state of low speed and low gravity, it is difficult to reflect the theory of relativity, and Newton's classical mechanics is accurate enough for us to use! However, once the vastness of space arrives, especially in the future space travel, Newton's classical mechanics will be completely replaced by the theory of relativity!

There are some hypotheses that have been tested at the time and will not be able to be confirmed for a while.

Not all of them have been tested, but there are some hypotheses that have been tested at the time.

I can't say that it's all of it, but some of it hasn't been confirmed, and it won't be confirmed for a while.

There are a number of hypotheses of the time that have been tested today.

Now scientists have used a large number of experimental facts to fully prove that it is absolutely correct that the microelement d can be reduced, so the theory of relativity has been fully verified, and the theory of relativity is the absolute truth.

Chang'e's flight to the moon has been verified.

I guess it's pretty much the same, and some of them have already been overturned.

So far, only some of them have been verified, so not all of them have been verified.

Only some of them have been proven, after all, Einstein's IQ has surpassed many people, and it is still difficult to prove all of them for centuries.

Definitely not, but some of them have been verified by the practice of scientists.

Savory. There is no definition of time and space, and it is actually said to be crooked.

Lightspeed travel immortality, verified?

It seems that there should be none, but the details are still not clear.

After an in-depth study of the inertial force, the famous principle of equivalence was proposed, and it was found that the reference frame problem could be solved together with the gravitational problem. After many twists and turns, Einstein finally established a complete general theory of relativity.

The theory of relativity has greatly changed mankind's "common-sense" concept of the universe and nature, and has put forward new concepts such as "simultaneous relativity", "four-dimensional space-time", and "curved space-time". However, in recent years, there has been a new understanding of the classification of physical theories, which distinguishes classical and non-classical physics according to whether their theories are deterministic, that is, "non-classical quantum". In this sense, the theory of relativity remains a classical theory.

The difference between special and general relativity.

Traditionally, in the early days of Einstein's theory of relativity, the classification of special versus general relativity was marked by whether the question under discussion involved a non-inertial frame of reference. With the development of the theory of relativity, this method of classification has become more and more disadvantageous—the frame of reference is related to the observer, and the division of physical theory by such a relative physical object is considered to be incapable of reflecting the essence of the problem.

It is generally believed that the difference between special and general relativity lies in whether the problem under discussion involves gravity (bending space-time), i.e., special relativity only deals with those problems that have no gravitational effect or can be ignored by gravitational action, while general relativity discusses physics when gravity acts.

In the language of relativity, the background space-time of the special theory of relativity is straight, that is, the four-dimensional trivial manifold is matched with the Min's gauge, and its curvature tensor is zero, also known as the Min's space-time; The background space-time of general relativity, on the other hand, is curved, and its curvature tensor is non-zero.

Einstein's theory of relativity is certainly not infallible. In fact, the contradiction between general relativity and quantum mechanics is almost the next innovation in physics. Who is humanity's greatest and most outstanding physicist to date?

It is believed that it should be the last century, the famous physicist Albert Einstein.

Einstein used the mass-energy equation to indirectly stop World War II and allow the United States to build the atomic bomb; His "theory of relativity" can also be called the greatest "subversion" in the history of physics, almost destroying the entire classical physics.

In Einstein's mouth, a wonderful, balanced coexistence between time, space, and gravity is formed. Anyone who has read the exquisite formulas of "special relativity" and "general relativity" will be impressed by his wisdom. Whether it is a black hole, or the grand theory of the universe, or the singularity theory; In fact, it's all through relativistic physics;

and then derived. Since time and space are relative, is the "theory of relativity" absolutely correct? Just kidding, there are no absolutes in physics.

The theory of relativity is only the mainstream view recognized by the academic community at present; Someday, he will be replaced by a more profound, brilliant theory.

In fact, even Albert Einstein himself was skeptical of the "general theory of relativity", and even denied more than he affirmed. That's right, when Hubble and others used the "general theory of relativity" to deduce the existence of black holes, Einstein once denied "black holes" in newspapers.

Later, the discovery of the Schwarzschild singularity made Einstein keenly aware of the phenomenon of "space-time expansion", which seems to represent that the universe has a lifespan. However, he himself was a staunch supporter of Newton's theory of space-time, so he took it upon himself to add a "cosmological constant" to his formula in a vain attempt to maintain the correctness of the old idea.

So, even if we throw this question to Einstein, he will still give a negative answer.

The theory of relativity is counterintuitive. As the saying goes, seeing is believing, Western scientists have made up a formula, and the number is so big that human beings have no way to verify whether it is true or false, they can only measure it with instruments. This is the most subtle part of the whole ** - those instruments themselves were also invented by them, and of course they have the final say in the measurement results.

Out of reverence for the achievements of Western science, we assume that those scientists are of noble character. But don't forget that Newton, the grandmaster of their scientists, was himself a man of inferior character. Therefore, it is entirely possible for scientists to make up lies.

There is no absolutely correct theory in the concept of science, only the theory that has been constantly tested by practice, and the theory that is consistent with the actual situation is the correct theory, and all theories are for the purpose of explaining the current situation we understand, and if it cannot be explained, it means that there is a problem with the theory.

Einstein's theory of relativity is certainly not infallible. The contradiction between general relativity and quantum mechanics is about to lead to the next innovation in the field of physics, and even Einstein himself is skeptical of the "general theory of relativity", and even denies more than affirms.

The fact that the microelement d can be reduced has been fully proven by the great scientists of today to be absolutely correct, so Einstein's theory of relativity is the absolute truth.

Theories are all family theories, temporary ideas, can be referred to, no need for superstition.

Einstein's theory of relativity, understood as such, is due to the fact that he limited speed to the speed of light. So there is his view of the theory of temporal relativity. Maybe it's because the human consciousness can't understand something or something.

It's a fact. Man cannot see anything faster than light, so to speak, there is no fastest and no slowest. There is no maximum and no minimum.

This can also be seen from a mathematical point of view.

Time is a concept. is a coefficient. Or rather, a ratio.

Time is relative. Speed is relative. Only when one is identified can the other be made clear.

Otherwise, it would be impossible to tell. Because they are constantly changing.

Einstein's theory of relativity cannot be said to be completely wrong, but he said that the speed is a limit value, so it is not right.

In terms of the current technical limitations, the above statement of "faster-than-light objects" has a fatal problem:

1. How to achieve the acceleration process at this speed: how long is the stick on the motor? What energy does it rely on, and how much energy does it need to reach the required speed?

How do you make sure that the stick remains straight and not curved during accelerated spins? We take a thin bamboo that is a little longer, and when we wave it, the bamboo will bend. 2. If it is said that the acceleration process can be ignored, then it becomes such a paradox:

An example of faster-than-light motion is assumed, and then this example is used to prove that there is faster-than-light motion.

The science produced by the culture of God casually, and the nature of the tongue is its scientific essence. Western scientists are likewise casual in nature.

Albert Einstein said that 1+1 is equal to 3: 1+1=3, in terms of physical dimensions, 1+1 is indeed equal to three, 1+1 is a point in the world of one, a point that cannot be moved, and 1+1 is in two dimensions. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, I think 1+1=3 is also correct hemp.

Because according to the theory of relativity: 1 drop of water plus 1 drop of water can also become 3 drops of hemp, of course, it can also be 1 drop, 2 drops, 4 drops, 9 drops, 76 drops, 8 drops, or even more. If the water evaporates, it is zero, and if you look at it from the perspective of water molecules, it is innumerable.

Cosmological constant: When Einstein proposed the theory of relativity, he introduced a term proportional to the gauge tensor into the gravitational field equation to explain the existence of a static universe with a non-zero density of matter, which was represented by symbols. This scale constant is small and negligible at the galactic scale.

It can only be meaningful on a cosmic scale, so it's called the cosmological constant. that is, the so-called anti-gravitational force fixed value) into his equations. He argues that there is an anti-gravitational force that balances with gravity and makes the universe finite and static.

When Hubble showed Einstein the astronomical observations of the expanding universe, Einstein said, "This is the biggest mistake I've ever made in my life." ”