Is it true that Darwin rejected his theory of evolution?

In old age, people will believe in fate to some extent.

Darwin married his cousin Emma, and three of their six children died in infancy, and the other three remained barren for life. This obviously cast a considerable psychological shadow on Darwin, and even doubted all his previous views.

The reason for the above is one, and another important reason, that the theory of biological evolution cannot explain the diversity of biological species.

Evidence for the disprovability of Darwin's theory of evolution: Darwin's theory of evolution was disproved by biomolecular science.

Evolution cannot explain biological phenomena at the molecular level, such as the eyes of animals. Complex organs such as the eye cannot be accomplished by slow evolution. They must work together at the same time.

Any small factor is indispensable. Another thing that evolution cannot explain is the explosion of life in the Cambrian period.

IntroductionDarwin argued that the evolution and variation of species in the biological world is based on the basic assumption of the evolution of natural selection: in addition, it is supplemented by the genetic ideas of sex selection and natural traits. In 1859, the publication of Darwin's The Origin of Species shook the entire academic and religious circles, and strongly impacted the biblical theory of creation.

Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" put forward the theory of biological evolution, and launched a revolution against the religious "creationism" and the "invariance of species" of Linnaeus and Cuvier, which shook the world. Because the theory of evolution violates the biblical doctrine of creation, it has been the focus of religious debate since its inception.

Darwin's theory of evolution is supported by a lot of evidence, such as biological fossils. In different strata, the fossils of organisms that appear are different, which is the most direct evidence of biological evolution. So, so far, there is no other argument that can overturn it.

Although there are some different arguments, the general direction of evolution is undoubtedly correct. It is impossible to be overthrown.

There is no evidence that Darwin's theory of evolution has been overturned!

As of May 2020, Darwin's Theory of Evolution has not been overturned.

To be precise, Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific theory that has been developing, from Darwin, Wallace, Huxley, Hooke, etc., to countless studies of zoology, botany, cytology, genetic biology, etc., and has been developing step by step. The theory of evolution is a scientific theory to find the laws of the evolution of life, so it is always changing and updating.

In the last century, when Darwin first proposed the theory of evolution, it was questioned by many people, and although it is now generally accepted, some voices of skepticism still exist. In fact, compared with other theories about the origin of human beings, the origin of species is the most accepted one, because compared with other species, the rate of human evolution is very fast, both in terms of appearance and intelligence. Because human beings have unique characteristics, most people's attitudes towards the origin of species are relatively supportive.

Unlike those who support the origin of species, there are also those who believe that human beings actually evolved on the basis of some kind of extraterrestrial civilization, and it is precisely because of this extraterrestrial civilization that there are current human beings and have a different appearance from other creatures on the earth. That is, these people are overthrowing Darwin's Theory of Evolution. For such a statement, not to mention scientists, even ordinary people will find such a statement incredible, and scientists have also made a lot of efforts to break this absurd and untrue statement.

Not overthrown. But the theory of evolution is not necessarily correct, it is just a hypothesis, and the theory of biological origin needs to be continuously improved, and science will definitely not be limited to this.

If you give the example of "eye", can you refute the theory of evolution, the answer is no. The eye, relying on the accumulation of variations little by little, can gradually evolve from the simplest light-sensing function to a complex and delicate organ, a process that does not require the participation of the designer.

If there is a watchmaker, he is also a blind watchmaker, he does not design the structure and function of the eye, but only makes a little change, waiting for natural selection to be the driving force to select the right eye.

It's not just the eyes, but the echolocation of bats, the wonderful survival skills of various creatures——— they, like the eyes, are not in place in one step, but evolved.

Adaptation is not evolution, the theory of broad evolution is an unproven hypothesis, the evolutionary hypothesis cannot be confirmed by scientific methods, the speed of mutation, the lack of fossil intermediates, and the logical synonym repeatedly. From a logical point of view, the theory of evolution has two propositions: 1. The most adaptable individuals in a group have the most children and grandchildren, and those who cannot adapt are eliminated. 2. The organisms that produce the most offspring are the most adaptable, and whoever has the greatest survivability has an advantage in the competition.

The reason for the overturning of Darwin's theory of evolution

Reason 1: Comparative anatomy. With the continuous development and research of anatomy, people have different views on the theory of evolution, because there is a certain contradiction between the two, and there is no accurate evidence to prove this, and it is more of a confused feeling.

Reason 2: Paleontology. If the theory of evolution exists, then species must have a transition stage, but there is a lack of a basic transition stage in paleontology.

Reason 3: Embryonic development. Embryonic development still has certain laws, which are more rigorous than the theory of evolution, and the theory of evolution has no more foundation and cannot withstand scrutiny and pondering. And, contrary to what Darwin hoped 150 years ago, there is growing evidence that evolution is not a scientific theory, and that it does not conform to the principle that science can be tested experimentally.

Darwin's theory of evolution has not been overturned, but there are doubts, the main doubt should be the Cambrian explosion of life, unknown reasons for the emergence of various animals in this period of time, the variety is unimaginable.