Do most professional photographers choose Nikon cameras over Canon?

There are many types of professional photographers.

And to engage in art design, art or something or use Canon more.

Some of the studio shots are Fuji and Pentax.

Actually, it's all inexplicable. There are so many categories of professional photography.

And they are often fixed to the machine that is equipped with the workplace, and it is not up to them to choose.

Comparatively speaking, their brand plot is also not as heavy as that of enthusiasts.

I even know professional photographers who use Olympus.

As far as lenses are concerned (Canon and Nikon are not universal) some of Nikon's lenses are more suitable for journalists (I have heard that Nikon's future direction is to replace the prime with a zoom head), and professional photographers are also divided into different directions, some are in the studio, and some are reporters, especially sports reporters. The Canon's prime head should have a slightly better feel than the Nikon, which means that people in the studio are generally more inclined to the Canon. In terms of reporters, in terms of the body, Nikon may be a little better (D3's continuous shooting ability), and for the camera, look at the scene of sports reporters, the white ones are all Canon, and the black ones are Nikon, which may be about the same.

If you want to use it, it's best to try both machines, and you will naturally feel it. I prefer Canon.

Let's put it this way, each has its own merits, the fixed focal length Canon is more excellent, and the zoom is Nikon's Nikkor. I don't know if you know that in history, Canon and Nikon have worked together, that is, Nikon has produced the fuselage, and Canon has released the lens, which is Nikon's fuselage, and Canon's lens.

I also don't know if you have noticed Canon's 5DII and 1DIII, where 1D's ** is more expensive than 5D, but the pixels are only half of 5D. That's because 1D is professional and suitable for high-speed shooting.

Here, because I use a Nikon machine, I recently went to learn about a Canon machine, and to be honest, I'm not used to it. I don't know where a lot of the function keys are, and I personally think that Nikon's focus point is better than Canon's.

aimin0077 Please go to the encyclopedia to see if it is Canon out of the body Nikon provides the lens At that time, Nikon was still Nikon Company.

Canon's telephoto lens group grew relatively rapidly About 30 years ago, sports photography was also the world of Nikon Black Cannon and Minolta Golden Cannon.

At present, I think sports photographers choose Canon more (background: Olympics, Nikon made a turnaround, and the D3 body was rushed to borrow by reporters).

There are a lot of Nikon news news, and because of a little historical background, Xinhua News Agency still uses Nikon, and maybe the predecessor Nikko is more reassuring to those old reporters.

Fallacy. Nikon's history of making cameras and lenses is indeed a little longer than Canon, but Canon is currently the market leader, and professional photographers undoubtedly use Canon a little more.

DSLR Canon sells more than Nikon! Professional photographers basically use SLRs, but if most professional photographers use Nikon, I don't know who Canon's SLRs are sold to?

There is no absolute answer to this question, as which brand of camera to use when shooting portraits depends entirely on your needs, preferences, and budget.

Nikon and Canon are among the most dominant camera brands on the market right now, and they both have their own advantages and disadvantages. In general, Nikon cameras have more accurate color reproduction, while Canon cameras have comparatively more saturated colors. The Nikon camera is more accurate, while the Canon camera has a better ISO performance. However, these strengths and weaknesses may manifest themselves differently in different camera models.

When thinking about taking portraits, here are some important factors that you need to consider:

1.Number of pixels: The number of pixels has a direct impact on detail and clarity.

When shooting portraits, you need to take into account the depiction of the details of the person's face, so a camera with a high pixel count is more advantageous. Both Nikon and Canon cameras have options for high pixels, depending on your budget and needs.

2.Autofocus system: Portrait photography requires fast, accurate focusing, especially when shooting people in motion. Both brands of autofocus systems are excellent, but it also depends on your camera model.

3.Lens selection: Lenses capable of capturing great portraits play a crucial role in the end effect, and both Nikon and Canon have their own excellent lens systems.

You can choose the right lens for you by considering factors such as lens focal length, aperture size, anti-reflective coating, and lens coefficient.

4.Camera controls: Some cameras have more flexible controls, settings, and operations that allow you to better grasp the camera's features and get better** results. You can choose the right camera for you by considering the control layout, operation method, and screen size of the camera.

5.Budget: The last point is budget, which is probably your most important consideration.

Within your budget, both Nikon and Canon have a selection of cameras and lenses suitable for portraits, and as long as you make an informed choice when considering the above factors, you can get a portrait with excellent detail and clarity**.

To sum up, while Nikon and Canon's cameras are somewhat different in some ways, choosing which brand is better for shooting portraits ultimately depends on your needs, budget, and personal preferences. Regardless of which brand you choose, it's important to choose the camera and lens that works for you, and use your technique and creativity to get a great portrait**.

Although I'm a long-time Nikon user, this statement is really speechless, not only outdated, but fundamentally wrong.

One of Canon's core technologies is the CMOS sensor, which has been leading the industry in the digital age. In the first few years of Nikon's involvement in DSLR, it had to rely on the technology of the film era as capital to compete with the pixel and even format advantages of Canon's advanced sensors. Today, Nikon has given up CCD and followed Canon's CMOS route, and has still not been able to catch up with Canon in terms of sensor development, but after all, it has already gotten rid of the embarrassing situation of people having me back then.

Mitsubishi Corporation is the founder of the Nikon brand. Nikon Corporation has a long history, founded on July 25, 1917, by the Mitsubishi consortium (Nitsubishi) to merge three optical instrument factories. At that time, it mainly produced military optical instruments for the Japanese Ministry of Defense.

The name nikon is a combination of the Japanese words "nippon" and "kogakn", so some people call it Nikko Corporation. In the early days of its creation, several German optical technicians were employed, and in 1932 the production of Nikkor lenses began. Nikon lenses were used by many camera manufacturers, including the early Canon.

Nikon has only been producing cameras since 1948, and the initial product was a copy of the German Contax rangefinder camera, the model Nikon. In 1959, Nikon introduced the first 135 single-lens reflex camera, the Nikon F.

Canon and Nikon both discovered the huge potential of the SLR camera market, and Canon was more keenly aware of the biggest advantage of the SLR camera compared with the previous dominating market rangefinder cameras was the huge expansibility of the lens, so Canon made a huge investment in the research and development of lenses and quickly achieved results, in 1962 launched the R58 for SLR, in 1963 launched the first zoom lens R55-135, in 1964 launched the largest aperture of the ultra-wide-angle SLR lens FL19 They are all excellent works that are the first to open up a trend. Nikon, on the other hand, has been indulging in the research and development of a sturdy body, and this R&D idea still inherits the old way of heavy body and light lens of rangefinder cameras, which is backward in terms of market strategy. The F-1 launched by Canon in 1971 easily surpassed Nikon in terms of fuselage.

Personally, I understand it this way, I have used both Canon and Nikon, according to the low-end SLR cameras and lenses, Nikon's *** is better than Canon, whether it is workmanship or cost performance or better than Canon, people who use open cameras will find that in terms of price, such as; The price of the 18-105mm head is only 1600, and it costs 2300 to change to Canon's 18-135mm, the focal length is not far apart, but the price difference is more than half, Canon has many lenses, especially the red circle lens, and Nikon's gold circle lens is more expensive, but the quality is better. These two are not up or down, each has its own merits, and in general, Nikon has done a good job of low-end SLR.

In addition, there are many varieties of Canon, because it means the upgrade of the camera, so the advertising will naturally be done more, but the parameters of the upgrade are just a toss-up, because the same level upgrade is meaningless, unless you are going from low-end to mid-range, or from mid-range to high-end. Otherwise you'll be tossed with parameters.

First of all, I personally think that this statement is wrong.

1. Sony is the king of cameras, which is nothing to say, but the SLR was listed on the backdoor after the acquisition of Minolta, Sony's core technology lies in CMOS, and Nikon is Sony's CMOS. The core technology of Sony's SLR was acquired through acquisition, and its own research and development, potential, and reserves cannot be compared with Nikon or Canon.

2. The quality of Nikon lenses is good, but its own research and development is also insufficient, such as Sony's for CMOS, so when the A900 was launched, I didn't forget to suppress Nikon and maintain high pixels.

3. Canon is a brand with all the technology, the research and development of CMOS has been ahead of other opponents, only the lens is still working hard, the quality of Canon's camera may not be very good, but it can be, and Canon is also a marketing master.

If you see Sony on a big occasion like a sports game, people will feel that you are different, basically Canon and Nikon are in the world. The white cannon and the black cannon are the best proof, so Sony is not yet hot, the card machine is sold expensive, and the effect is not as good as the effect of the Fujifilm card machine, how can it be said that Sony is a camera? There are no highlights at all.

Contemptible mid-level photographer.

From a professional point of view, Canon wins with technology, that is, playing virtual, Nikon pays more attention to quality, things are more realistic, Nikon lenses are heavy, strong and ......Anything else, nothing, that means, photography has nothing to do with the machine, it has to do with your technique, your experience, and the beauty of the composition.

Don't be superstitious about these two brands, just get a cost-effective one.

Because Nikon started with optics, very early in World War II, the sights of Japanese tanks, and so on, were basically Nikon's, relatively early.

Canon only got a camera later, and the ads were overwhelming, and the sales were huge, but the cost performance was very expensive.

That's why I said that Nikon is the only world-class brand in Japan, and Canon is more popular in China, and I watch advertisements every day,。。

Canon may sell more than Nikon, but most people who really know how to do it choose Nikon.

That's it.

First of all, both cameras are very good, and each has its own advantages.

But Canon's advertising efforts are really incomparable to Nikon.,Every time Canon comes out with a new machine,It's going to give a lot to reporters.,Photographers.,It's a large-scale international sporting event.,Canon is free to use.。。 LZ, have you ever seen a camera strap packed in a big box, and all kinds of big white heads are lined up in a room full of shelves? There are also major colleges and universities, and Canon will send cameras to the teachers of the photography department.

But I feel like Nikon is slightly better at the cost performance of low-end machines and the technology of high-end machines. Although I use Canon's o(o

So, Canon sells cameras.

But when I entered the school, the teacher told us that 8 million pixels are good machines, and we can only blame ourselves if we can't get out of the beat. A lot of people don't have good cameras, but the shots are great.

So I think this gap between Jia and Ni can be completely ignored. The most important thing is the eyes and the brain.

It depends on what kind of photography you do, Canon, Nikon performance is good, I think it depends on what effect you need to shoot, how many pixels you need, choose a lens that suits you (the lens is very important) for general use, 18-105mm is enough.

First of all, there is no good or bad, only cost-effective.

If it's a low-end machine + lens, Nikon is good. Less than 10,000.

Mid-to-high-end machine + lens, Canon is good. 1-30,000.

High-end machines, each with its own strengths and characteristics. More than 30,000.