Materialism is agnosticism, and idealism is agnosticism. The number of words is more than 300 words

This statement is false. (Note: The following answers are just my own opinions, not comparable to standard answers, if there is anything inappropriate, please forgive me).

The basic questions of philosophy include two aspects: 1. Consciousness and the natural world of matter and spirit, who is the origin of the world, that is, the question of which is the first nature and what is the second nature of matter and spirit. 2. Whether thinking can recognize or correctly recognize existence, that is, the question of whether thinking and existence are identical.

To put it simply, the basic question of philosophy (the relationship between thinking and being) leads to the question of "what is the primacy of thinking and being", and at the same time, "whether thinking and existence are identical".

By extension, "what is the primacy of thinking and existence" is to say that it is the thinking that determines existence, or existence that determines thinking. Hence the distinction between idealism and materialism. "Whether there is identity between thinking and being" is about whether existence can be thought by humans, or whether humans can think about existence, if existence can be thought by humans, that is, thinking and existence have identity (agnosticism), and if existence cannot be thought by humans, it means that there is no identity between thinking and existence (agnosticism).

Hence the distinction between agnosticism and agnosticism.

Therefore, it cannot be said that materialism is agnosticism and idealism is agnosticism.

Total: about 350 words.

There is something wrong with this statement.

The difference between idealism and materialism lies in the question of primacy, that is, the question of what is the origin of the world, which is the first major question of philosophy. Rather than the questions of the knowable and the unknowable, the questions of the knowable and the unknowable are the second great problems of philosophy.

Materialism is knowable, but idealism is not all unknowable. The famous idealist, Hegel, was the agnostic.

Agnosticism vs. agnosticism.

The biggest difference is between materialism and idealism.

The difference. Agnosticism refers to the belief that thinking and being are identical.

That is, the philosophical doctrine that holds that human consciousness can correctly understand the objective world and its laws is agnosticism.

Materialist.

It is the agnostic who insists on the primacy of matter, the secondness of consciousness.

The thorough idealist is also an agnostic, insisting on the primacy of consciousness and the secondness of matter.

Agnosticism is a philosophical doctrine that believes that thinking and existence have no identity, that is, that human consciousness cannot or cannot thoroughly understand the objective world and its laws, is called agnosticism.

Agnosticism asserts that human beings cannot go beyond the scope of sensory experience or phenomena to know the nature of things and the laws of their development. Many schools of thought deny the objectivity of scientific truth from agnosticism. A philosophical theory that excludes the possibility of knowing the world, or the possibility of knowing the world thoroughly.

Question 1: Materialism is agnosticism and idealism is agnosticism You can't be classified so simply, your statement is wrong. Agnosticism means that the world can be known by people, and there are only things in the world that have not yet been known, and there are no things that cannot be known.

Materialists are agnostic. They insist that material is the first and the second nature of consciousness. Thorough idealists are also agnostic, but they insist on the primacy of consciousness and the secondness of matter.

The main proponents of agnosticism are materialists and subjective idealists, but there is a qualitative difference between the two. Materialist agnosticism is mainly based on two theories: "everything has a law" and "matter is not transferred by consciousness". Subjective idealists, on the other hand, believe that the origin of the world is one's own consciousness, and within the scope of one's own consciousness, the world is of course knowable.

This is actually not acknowledging that there is an unknown world. Objective idealists emphasize unknowability, and when you ask the question of "God", objective idealists cannot, so they say that this is a super-material thing, not something that human science can explain. There is also a theory that God is supernatural and has no laws to speak of, or that God is omnipotent and can transcend the laws of nature, so it cannot be known.

Agnosticism is often associated with mysticism and theism.

Question 2: Analytical Question: Materialist Agnosticism, Materialist Agnosticism If you make a mistake, it should be a critical analysis question:

Materialist agnosticism, idealistic agnosticism is wrong on this topic. The first half of the sentence is right, materialism is agnosticism, and they all believe that there is an objective world outside of human feelings that is not subject to human will, and they all believe that this world can be known and can be correctly recognized. The second half of the sentence is wrong, idealism is not all agnosticism.

Some idealism is agnosticism, such as Hegel's idealism; Another part of idealism is agnosticism, such as Berkeley's philosophy of idealism.

Question 3: Is materialism agnostic, and idealism agnostic? Seeing is not necessarily believing. Frog at the bottom of the well, you should know that you can't guess with your own narrow concept if you haven't learned the theoretical system. You are like a bucket, you energy out to sea?

Question 4: Distinguish between materialism and obscenity as agnosticism and idealism as agnosticism Materialism and idealism are both reveries within the scope of human thinking. It's all doctrines that need to be perfected.

Question 5: Materialism is agnosticism, and agnosticism must be idealistic epistemology Not necessarily, agnosticism is a blind spot that exists in idealistic materialism, and because it is unknowable, it cannot be judged accurately. It can be seen that the intersection of the two is also the gap, and the main difference is the order of existence of matter and consciousness.

1. This statement is wrong.

2. Materialism and idealism, agnosticism and agnosticism, as two pairs in philosophy, are independent of two different aspects of the basic problem of philosophy (that is, the relationship between thinking and being), and there is no direct relationship between the two, but there is a cross-relationship. That is, idealistic philosophy can be agnosticism or agnosticism, but materialist philosophy is mostly an agnostic philosophy.

3. The basic problems of philosophy and their contents.

The basic questions of philosophy have two aspects: the first is the question of what is the origin of thinking and existence, consciousness and the age of things. There have always been two fundamental differences on this issue, and as a result, two camps, two basic factions, and two opposing lines have been formed in philosophy.

All philosophical schools that believe that consciousness is primary and matter is secondary, that is, consciousness precedes matter, matter depends on consciousness for existence, and matter is the product of consciousness belongs to idealism; Any philosophical school that believes that matter is primary and consciousness is secondary, that is, matter precedes consciousness and consciousness is the product of matter belongs to materialism.

Another aspect of the fundamental problem of philosophy is the question of the identity of thinking and being. The vast majority of philosophers, including materialist philosophers and some idealist philosophers, have affirmed this aspect. However, materialism and idealism have different solutions to this problem in principle.

Materialism is based on the recognition of the objective existence of the material world and its laws, and the recognition of thinking as a reflection of existence, and the recognition of the world as knowable; Idealism, on the other hand, regards the objective world as the product of thinking and spirit, and believes that knowing the world is the self-knowledge of the spirit. There were also philosophers such as DHume and I

Kant, who denied the possibility of knowing the world, or denied the possibility of knowing the world thoroughly, were agnostics in the history of philosophy.

Agnosticism. All materialists and outright idealists advocate agnosticism. Although the old materialists adhered to the theory of knowability, they did not understand the position and role of practice in cognition, did not understand that cognition is an active dialectical process, and did not scientifically solve the problem of how the world can be known.

Thorough idealists, such as Hegel, also affirm that the world is knowable, but their knowable original meaning is that the "Absolute Idea" can be self-aware, which reverses the real relationship between matter and consciousness, and does not correctly solve the problem of knowability in the real world. For the first time, dialectical materialism introduced the practical perspective and dialectics into epistemology, scientifically expounding the question of the knowability of the world.

It should be b, agnosticism and materialism and idealism are two pairs, independent of each other, and of all materialism, only Marx's thing is dialectical.

aAgnosticism is an idealist epistemology. b Realism is a philosophical trend in the Middle Ages, and the essence of realism is idealism. c Agnosticism is a materialist epistemology.

d Dialectics are not necessarily materialistic, Hegel's dialectics are idealistic. So the answer should be c

c.Agnosticism.

Materialism is divided into: ancient naïve materialism, modern metaphysical materialism, dialectical materialism and historical materialism. All three schools of thought believe that the world is knowable, that is, knowable.

c Because materialism focuses only on objective facts.

All materialism is (c) cAgnosticism.

Answer] :d Marxist philosophy believes that it is the practice of modular fiber that can ultimately refute agnosticismDialectical materialism argues that the key to refuting agnosticism is to imitate modern science into epistemology.