His Holiness Furuna is a portrait of Shakyamuni Buddha when he was 41 years old

How is that possible? Was there an oil painting 2,500 years ago?! Some scholars have broken the word in one sentence!

It is impossible to see the image of the Buddha, you have to refer to the existing 8-year-old and 12-year-old statues of the Buddha, and one of those two must be authentic! I heard that the eight-year-old and twelve-year-old were supervised by the Buddha's nursing mother who brought him up since childhood, so it is more approximate. This is obviously something else painted by later generations, and I don't know how to mess with it.

Before the Buddha Nirvana, he said the end of the Dharma period.

The evil master (evil demon crooked) saying, like the sand of the Ganges.

Now it seems that it is really oh, obvious fraud, Zhang Guan Li Dai, everyone believes it, such a naïve ** can deceive a large group of ignorant people! Pathetic!

Learn about Buddhism. Everyone knows that Buddhism advocated not having a beard at that time, so how could there still be a beard? Another ridiculous place.

Don't make a fuss.

The Buddha statue we generally see is made according to the Buddha's incarnation, the Buddha who lives in the world, ordinary people see him is an ordinary person, and the Buddha's reincarnation you can't see if you don't have a certain amount of practice. Because you're not on the same channel as him. There are still many great achievers in the world today, but you still can't see their retribution when you see them.

If you look at anyone with an ordinary heart, you are an ordinary man. Only when your own realm has been raised can you see the Buddha's rebirth.

So don't slander anyone, because you don't know what kind of person you're slandering. Be respectful to all living beings.

Earrings (the Buddha does not wear no ornaments, there are precepts), hair (the precepts should not be too long, the Buddha cannot violate the precepts), and the appearance (the Buddha looks good and solemn) cannot be Shakya.

This has already been verified, and the Venerable Fu Lou is also a figure from 2,000 years ago, how has his painting been passed down to the present? What kind of paints and canvases were used at that time? How did you paint it like an oil painting 2,000 years ago?

A little thought will make it clear that this is a hypocrisy. In addition, there is also a portrait on the Internet that is very similar to this but different, and it is also said that it was painted by the Venerable Fu Lou, which is now in a museum in the United Kingdom, and someone specifically verified it with this museum, saying that there is no such painting at all, so this is obviously someone is pretending.

His Holiness Furuna was a high monk during the Tang Dynasty who painted a portrait of Shakyamuni Buddha when he was 41 years old. At that time, Venerable Fu Lou Na swore in front of the Buddha with his divine powers: "If I break my promise, I will never see Shakyamuni again in this life"!

Then he put on his robe and crown, and went away in worship.

From this, it can be seen that when Venerable Furuna said, "If I break my promise, I will never see Shakyamuni again in this life", he means that if he breaks his promise, he will not be able to see Shakyamuni's face again in this life. Therefore, the answer is b.

Shakyamuni is a human being, not a monster with three eyes and two noses.

Fake, how could the Buddha have long hair, earrings, and beard It's obviously fake.

Later generations had nothing to do, so they painted according to their own ideas. Not really.

What the tmlwho brother said is extremely true!

On the other hand, all living beings in the world do not have the solemn appearance of the Buddha, and anyone who sees the Buddha statue must be able to rejoice immeasurably, because the Buddha is the most blessed and wise, and there is no more majestic appearance than the Buddha in heaven on earth.

And this portrait, ordinary people can't be happy when they see it, but they think it looks weird, and it's not even handsome, right? It is not at all a pleasing solemnity, when the Buddha was alive, many people saw the Buddha statue and did not give up their eyes, which shows that the Peugeot of the Buddha statue is extremely high. Let's see that many mages now have more solemn appearances than this portrait, right?

The Indian Enlightenment Pagoda is enshrined in the real Shakyamuni Buddha statue, which is said to have taken Maitreya Bodhisattva six months to make, and is very consistent with the record of Buddha statues in Chinese Buddhist scriptures, as well as the standard size of all Buddha statues in China, see which statue is more solemn?

Don't look at the elephant, it's obvious, it's fake, it's the race, and 3,000 years ago, northern India was the Aryan race, which was the white race, and the Buddha's caste was the Kshatriya race, which was the aristocratic race, so it was more of a white race.

I looked at this portrait, there are earrings, it should not be the Buddha's.

The old version of Journey to the West, the portrait on the hat worn by Tang Seng looks.

You go and see the Buddha statue. The feeling of compassion for all beings.

Fake. In the time of Shakya, there was no such thing as portraits.

It is rumored that there is a portrait of Shakya in the British Museum, but some people contacted the museum, but there is no collection of this painting.

What was from 500 B.C., can it be preserved to the present? At that time, it was still used leaves.

Find it yourself in "The Theory of Great Wisdom". Nagarjuna spoke the most comprehensively. Most of the patriarchs of later generations just quoted from this place.

There is no such record in the Buddhist scriptures! What do you see in **? Hearsay is not credible, everything is subject to Buddhist scriptures.

However, the story you mentioned has a origin, it is an allusion to the "Hanging Beam Thorn Stock" recorded in the "Warring States Policy", in which the "Hanging Beam" records a young man named Sun Jing in the Eastern Han Dynasty, who was tireless, diligent and studious, and made an act in order to prevent dozing. The reason why a Buddha became a Buddha is not just to make the act of hanging the beam and piercing the strands, but to do something of greater merit, which is different from the hanging beam thorns! Don't confuse Buddhism with Confucianism.

Fake, just legends, there is no Buddha in the world, there are only Nuwa in the myths and legends in the Ming world, and the ones behind are **, apocryphal, don't be too true.

In the immeasurable reincarnation, all Buddhas will make this wish to make this wish to facilitate their own practice and the transformation of sentient beings! It is not a lifetime vow, but a immeasurable vow that can deepen the good roots and eventually become a Buddha!

No, the original meaning of the word Buddha is enlightenment, and Shakyamuni Buddha became a Buddha because he was completely enlightened and fully understood the truth of life in the universe, so he was called an enlightened one!

The word 'Buddha' is transliterated from Indian Sanskrit, which means 'wisdom, enlightenment'. Why didn't you use the words 'wisdom, enlightenment' to translate it, but 'Buddha'? Because the meaning of the Buddha is infinitely deep and wide, we cannot cover all the words wisdom and enlightenment in our Chinese vocabulary, so we use transliteration and then annotate.

The word 'Buddha' is physical and useful. In its essence, it is 'wisdom', and in terms of its function, it is 'enlightenment'.