What was the military confrontation between the two camps in the early days of the Cold War Please h

NATO's confrontation with the Warsaw Pact.

Yalta System (English: Yalta System) is the name of the international political pattern from 1945 to 1991, named after the Yalta Conference held in Yalta, Churchill, and Stalin in Yalta, the Soviet Union, in early 1945. Its characteristics are:

With the United States and the Soviet Union as the center, the Cold War for hegemony was fought on a global scale, but it was not excluded that wars in local areas with the direct or indirect participation of the two superpowers (such as the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, etc.) were carried out. The upheavals in Eastern Europe in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked the final collapse of the Yalta system. Bipolar Pattern Temporarily, the bipolar pattern existed in the early 50s of the 20th century, ending with the reunification of Germany in 1990.

This is manifested in the military confrontation between NATO and the Warsaw Pact led by the United States and the Soviet Union, the struggle for the Third World, the mutual economic embargo and blockade, the frenzied competition in armaments, the vain attempt to gain superiority over the opponent, and the ideological mutual attack. Generally speaking, it is the situation in which the two major blocs, the United States and the Soviet Union, occupy an absolutely dominant position in the world power structure and are hostile to and confronted each other, but cannot defeat their opponents. In 1949, 12 Western countries, including the United States, Britain, France, and Italy, signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and established the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO.

In 1955, the Warsaw Pact was signed to counter the socialist camp led by the Soviet Union in NATO, and the Warsaw Pact Organization was established. Since then, the pattern of confrontation between the two major military blocs has been formally formed. During World War II, the United States, the Soviet Union, China, and the United Kingdom formed a world anti-fascist alliance to oppose a common enemy.

Shortly after the end of World War II, the United States pursued a Cold War policy towards the Soviet Union and other socialist countries. After Khrushchev came to power, he put forward the basic strategy of sitting on an equal footing with the United States, realizing cooperation between the United States and the Soviet Union, and jointly dominating the world. With the further enhancement of the Soviet Union's economic and military strength, from the late 50s, the pattern of the United States and the Soviet Union competing for hegemony gradually took shape.

The struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union was divided into three stages, from the mid-50s to the early 60s, which was the first stage of the struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union. This period was characterized by both détente and contention from the mid-60s to the late 70s, which was the second stage of the US-Soviet struggle for hegemony. It was characterized by the fact that the Soviet Union was on the offensive and the United States switched from offensive to defensive The late 80s and early 90s were the third stage of the US-Soviet struggle for hegemony.

At the end of December 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, and the situation of the United States and the Soviet Union in the cold war came to an end.

The Warsaw Pact and NATO.

Warsaw Pact or Warsaw Treaty Organization (also known as Warsaw Pact or Warsaw Treaty Organization; Russian: is a political-military alliance formed to counter the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

After the formation of the Yalta system after World War II, there was a Cold War pattern of confrontation between the two camps. The Cold War pattern refers to all hostile actions taken by the United States against the Soviet Union and other socialist countries on the military side, except for military attacks. The bipolar pattern of the Cold War refers to the fact that the United States and the Soviet Union far surpassed other countries in terms of comprehensive national strength, thus forming a competitive situation.

The establishment of the Warsaw Pact marked the formal formation of a bipolar pattern. The struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union refers to the military expansion and political confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union in order to become world hegemons. The Cold War was precisely the policy pursued by the United States in order to dominate the world.

Introduction to the Cold WarThe Cold War refers to the political, economic, and military struggle between 1947 and 1991 between the capitalist camp dominated by the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the socialist camp dominated by the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact Organization. The bipolar pattern is centered on the United States and the Soviet Union, with the two major military blocs NATO and the Warsaw Pact antagonistic in Europe, and an all-out confrontation between the capitalist camp and the socialist camp in the world. It existed from the early 50s of the 20th century to the early 90s (end of 1991) when the Soviet Union collapsed.

1. Economic strength determines everything. Whoever has strong economic strength will be in an advantageous position in the process of fighting for hegemony. Therefore, we should quicken the pace of economic development, enhance our country's comprehensive national strength, and always remain in an invincible position in the world.

2. Hegemonism is an important factor that threatens world peace. It is necessary to oppose hegemonism and advocate world peace.

3. The struggle for hegemony between the United States and the Soviet Union is a confrontation between different social systems, so it is necessary to strengthen dialogue between countries, resolve differences between them in a peaceful way, and jointly build a harmonious world.

4. Today, the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union is gone, the world political pattern is developing towards multipolarization, the world economy has shown a trend of globalization, and harmonious development has become the common pursuit of all countries in the world. In the process of development, many problems will be encountered, and differences and even conflicts may arise between countries. Therefore, all countries should strengthen dialogue, seek common ground while reserving differences, solve problems in a peaceful way, and jointly build a harmonious world.

Politics is the master of human society, and all material distribution and the formation of consciousness are related to it. The Cold War was caused by the division of ideologies, and the leaders of the two camps were hostile to countries with different ideologies in order to justify their national consciousness.

In order to overwhelm each other in science and technology, the two sides of the Cold War vigorously developed high and new technology, and accelerated the process of the third scientific and technological revolution, but there were too many political factors in this. From 1946 to 1991, the ups and downs of the Cold War in the past 45 years have been embarrassing with a flick of a finger. A huge country is not defeated by force or spies, and the lesson is not profound.

It's just that although the Cold War has become a historical relic, the Cold War mentality has never really disappeared from the earth. I don't see if the cloud of war hanging over the heads of the world will reappear in the name of the war on terrorism.

Enlightenment: The development of society does not progress in opposition, but depends on communication between people.

Are we winning the war? ”（are we winning？This question may seem simple, but for the US military, it is a very complex and difficult problem in different historical periods.

Over the past few decades, the U.S. military has conducted some fruitful explorations around this issue – often collectively referred to as "operational assessments." In recent years, as an operational research institution, CNA analysts have increasingly felt that operational evaluation is an unavoidable field. However, we do not have a comprehensive and systematic grasp of the history of operational assessments.

The purpose of this paper is to sort out and study the development process and lessons learned from operational evaluation, so as to lay a good foundation for our research work.

Operational assessment sprouted during World War II, but it really took shape during the Vietnam War. As the United States became embroiled in the bitter and distressing war of insurgency and counterinsurgency on the battlefields of Vietnam, researchers at the Operational Research and Systems Analysis (ORSA) organization began working to develop methods for assessing the war. The main driving force behind this effort came from then-Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara.

According to McNamara's thinking, data collected from the battlefield helps in operational evaluation.

McNamara's guiding principles have led to the emergence of three types of assessment models: the Capability Calculation Model, the Hamlet Assessment System, and the Southeast Asia Assessment Report. All three models rely on large amounts of data input to determine the extent to which the U.S. military has achieved its goals on the battlefield in Vietnam.

Although these methods are major innovations in the field of operational assessment, they are very unreliable in practical application and cannot accurately assess warfare. In short, such methods place too much emphasis on quantitative estimation and neglect qualitative analysis, and often fail to take into account the complex environment of the Vietnam battlefield. By the end of the war, the leaders of the United States and the Department of Defense were no longer obsessed with these assessment methods, and even considered them ineffective and useless.

What is the military ideology that has had a relatively large impact after the end of the Zambia? I feel that if you calm down with this, Chen Si will definitely find a lot of, well, the means and some strategies that are conducive to war.

After the end of the Cold War. There should be a relatively large military ideology for the world. Precision strikes. Remote control. Preemptive.

How influential was the United States after the end of the Cold War? Say it and you may not believe it.

The Cold War refers to the period from 1947 to 1991 when the two major powers, the United States and the Soviet Union, in addition to direct war, were in a state of confrontation in economic, political, military, diplomatic, cultural, ideological and other aspects.

The Cold War began with the end of World War II, with the economic crisis of the Soviet Union in the eighties, and the democratic reforms of Gorbachev (Gorbachev), which led to the collapse of the communist state, and the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. The Chinese Kuomintang-Communist Civil War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Afghanistan War (1979) are examples of regional conflicts between several Eastern and Western countries, but most of the time they are only conflicts between people on both sides, and in these conflicts, the major powers only support the countries or organizations through funds and aid. In doing so, the tension between the two camps is reduced.

One of the main areas of competition between the United States and the Soviet Union was science and technology, but it also included very covert espionage warfare and political propaganda warfare on both sides. Although the spy systems of the two sides often carry out covert assassination operations, due to the deterrence of nuclear weapons, there has been no full-scale conflict between the two camps. Of course, at the time, it was not clear whether a regional skirmish could lead to a nuclear war, and in light of this, every conflict was a source of great concern.

This tension has changed the lives of all people around the world almost like a real war.

Germany was arguably the main point of contention in the Cold War, especially Berlin. The Berlin Wall may well be the most vivid symbol of the Cold War. The wall separated East Berlin (belonging to East Germany) from West Berlin (belonging to West Germany) and isolated West Berlin from East Germany.

In fact, the root cause of local wars is the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, and the root cause of the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union is ideological differences. The Soviet Union was a socialist country, and the United States was a capitalist country. Capitalism is not the same ideology as socialism.

The social system is different. At the same time, the reason for the confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union was the uneven distribution of interests. After World War II, the United States rose rapidly to become the number one capitalist power.

Want to dominate the world and control the world. At this time, the Soviet Union, as the leading country of socialism, also wanted to expand some of its own interests. In such a situation, there is a confrontation and conflict of interests.

After World War II, there was a power vacuum in both Germany and the Korean Peninsula. The United States and the Soviet Union divided their own spheres of influence. A number of small local factors contributed to the conflict.

However, the root cause of the local war was the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. That is, ideological differences and conflicts of national interests.

The United States and the Soviet Union competed for hegemony, wrestling in local areas, resources, topography, and taking sides.

The root cause is hegemonism, mainly the antagonism between the two camps in the world.