The Qinghai Tibet Railway is not a commodity Information about the Qinghai Tibet Railway

Commodities meet two conditions, i.e., they are the products of labor and are used for exchange.

The first point is undeniable.

The second point is whether it is used for exchange: the exchange of commodities must have two opposing parties to the exchange of commodities in the market. Although there was financing in the process of producing the railway, it was not an exchange.

Railways are not produced for exchange. In fact, the economic value of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway is not very obvious at present, and it is mainly due to political factors. This also shows that the railway is not a commodity.

It may be said that railways are sometimes leased out, but only for a temporary period of use, and the ownership of the railways does not change.

The argument that railways can be sold is not allowed to be ignored. Because judging from the current wishes of the state, the construction of the Qinghai-Tibet Railway is not at all for sale, and it is impossible to enter the market for commodity circulation. As for whether there will be an auction in the future (after what other railways or means of transportation) will be held, it is completely meaningless, but only a speculation about one possibility.

Like, you can say that everything that exists, you can say that the owner can sell it, and this is true, but who would say that everything in the world is a commodity. Those who would say this have no economic common sense, but are just another manifestation of the idea of the supremacy of money.

The distinction between commodities and commodities cannot be distinguished from whether they make money or not.

Yes, definitely! Marxist theory: the two basic attributes of commodities: use value and exchange value.

There is obviously a use value, of course there is an exchange value, the state has ownership, and of course it can be sold if the state wants to.

Western economic theory: scarce products that can meet people's needs.

Railways obviously meet a certain need, otherwise they would not have been built. And the lack of hope is even more possessive, it is easy to build such a one, and it is definitely not full of streets.

So the conclusion: yes.

From the beginning of its construction, the Qinghai-Tibet Railway has been a process full of exchanges. "Exchange" does not necessarily mean selling as a whole, nor is it necessarily understood in a narrow sense as selling to a specific person or unit. It can be in the form of having a gradual transfer.

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway is in use, and there is no doubt that it has use value. In what way is its use value reflected? What is the relationship between the embodiment of this value?

How much does it cost to build**?

It is not to be exploited for free.

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway is indeed a commodity.

The two essential attributes of a commodity are use value and value.

Use value refers to the usefulness of a thing to a person.

Value refers to the undifferentiated human labor condensed in commodities.

Definition of commodity: the product of labor used in exchange.

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway is a product of labor, but it has not been exchanged and has not been sold to any unit or individual. It is simply a public facility of the state, for the use of all citizens.

In terms of basic attributes, the Qinghai-Tibet Railway has use value, but it has no value, because value is to determine the proportion of two labor products when exchanging, and the labor contained in them is abstracted as the concept of value. Value is generated for exchange, and the generation of value necessarily facilitates exchange.

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway is not used for exchange, so it has no value.

The product of labour which has only use value and no value is not a commodity.

The commodity must be a unity of value and use value, and both are indispensable.

Of course, railways are commodities, and other people's routes are commodities, and planes have to collect money when they pass through that line. This is especially true for railways.

No. A commodity is a product of labor used for exchange and has a use value and value.

And the Qinghai-Tibet Railway itself is not for exchange.

The two basic attributes of a commodity: use value and exchange value.

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway has use value but no exchange value.

It's not a commodity, but the reason why you make money watching the railroad is because there are trains on it, and the customer buys the service of the railroad.

No. Trains run on railways, if railways are considered commodities. Airplanes fly in the sky, is the sky a commodity? The ship is at sea, is the sea a commodity?

The Qinghai-Tibet Railway was completed in two phases, the first phase of the project started from Xining City in the east to Golmud City in the west, started construction in 1958, and was completed and opened to traffic in May 1984; The second phase of the project, from Golmud City in the east to Lhasa City in the west, started on June 29, 2001 and opened to traffic on July 1, 2006.

Qinghai-Tibet Railway from Xining Station to Lhasa Station; The total length of the line is 1,956 kilometers, including 814 kilometers from Xining to Golmud and 1,142 kilometers from Golmud to Lhasa. There are 85 stations with a designed maximum speed of 160 km/h (Xining-Golmud to Lhasa).