-
If we talk about whether it should or shouldn't, obviously, there is no such thing as should;
From the perspective of the social orientation of paying, it is obvious that men are more likely to pay;
As far as most of the ladies around me are concerned, if they want to develop after the blind date, they are basically men who pay, but before the relationship is determined, the woman will strictly control the amount of the bill generated, and she doesn't want the other party to break the bill too much;
The most important thing is that I think it is better to judge the possibility of the subsequent development of both parties and pay rationally, so that there will be no measurement of loss or loss;
The so-called talking about feelings hurts money, no matter what the result is, how much will hurt a drop of silver, this psychological expectation, men have to have...
-
Question 1: It's up to you whether you should continue to contact each other.
Question 2: It depends on your understanding whether you make money or lose, if you lose money, you may earn something else, if you don't pull out a dime, you won't suffer, but you can't get it.
Question 3: I don't know what to do, I don't think about such a problem because I don't think it's a problem at all.
-
First, it is normal for men to check out, but it depends on how many times, if you date 30 times a month, and the girl doesn't mention words like "checkout" or "I'm coming", then you can basically choose not to contact.
If the relationship has been established, some things should be said clearly, because love is something that needs to be paid by both parties.
Second, why some men you are referring to don't think about such a question is because they have relatively strong economic strength, and they may have a plan, maybe they eat 2-3 times a month, and the rest of the time may be within the contact.
-
It depends on what you think.
-
For this topic, it should be a problem that single men and women in society face when they meet for the first time.
As a traditional Chinese etiquette and morality, men should pay the bill, after all, men are responsible for supporting their families after marriage, and most men are also willing to pay for the girls they like, even if they don't like it, they will estimate that they will take the initiative to pay for their faces, which will not embarrass the girl. Speaking of this, many ladies may not like to listen to it, saying that the men I met are too picky, and the first meeting did not negotiate, so they did not pay or paid the bill, and there are indeed many such cases. But for men to have this situation, I don't agree that they are really buckled, after all, that man has machismo, and he likes to leave a good influence on girls in this public place, which leads to this situation:
One is that many people are not able to negotiate well at one time in the blind date, some refuse in person, and some fail in the process of talking, which has caused some burden to most boys, if every time the boy takes the initiative to pay, it will inevitably cause some residual Zen impact on his money, plus frustration again and again, he is definitely unwilling to take the initiative to pay, plus some affected by the social atmosphere, the influence of the girl who is not pure in his heart, resulting in the boy becoming less and less active.
For girls, I don't think it's necessary to worry too much about the first time you meet the boy to pay, because the first time you meet you are not meeting as a couple, you may just be friends or strangers, before you determine the relationship, there is no need to pay too much attention to this, imagine if you know that the boy pays every blind date, what do you think, so we have to think more about the benefits. Blind date meeting and eating is fate, since it is fate, both people should show their sincerity, there is no need to worry about who pays in the end, they all say that they eat people with short mouths, take people with short hands, and it is a favor for a small meal to be sold and ruined, and you take the initiative to pay, and the man will not let you buy it, and the most inferior I have seen is AA.
So I think everyone should be more concerned about the person on both sides when they meet for the first time, rather than dwelling on a meal. If both parties are satisfied and feel the need to break up the chat, then no one cares who pays. If you don't think it's appropriate, AA has its own way, and it doesn't owe favors, right, it's good to get together.
So in fact, the purpose of meeting and eating is to judge what kind of person each other is through each other's words and deeds. If you don't think it's appropriate, then it's okay to pay for each one, but if you have a good feeling, it's best to take the initiative to pay. If the woman chooses AA, then respect his choice, but for girls who have a good feeling, it is better to take the initiative.
So far, I sincerely wish every single dog to get off the single as soon as possible and be full of happiness!
-
I think it's good for everyone to go on a blind date for the first time, so I'll go out for dinner together as friends, and then see the development later.
If the relationship is likely to develop further, then it doesn't matter who pays the money and who doesn't pay it, if you have it, you will accept it, and if you don't have it, it will have no impact on the relationship.
Actually, it's not that important to pay, and if a boy pays, I'll feel a little uncomfortable.
Usually when it's a date, the guy has already paid for it, and if he doesn't buy it, I'll pay for it.
To be specific, if I fall in love with him, I will take the initiative to pay.
In this way, I can also ask him to invite me again, and there will be one more chance to meet and communicate.
If I don't like it, I'll AA and transfer half of the money to him. After all, no one has taken a fancy to it, so there is no need to let other key dates spend more money like people.
But there are also cases where I transfer money and the other party doesn't accept it, so I can't help it, but I really don't want to take advantage of someone else's meal.
The reason why this is so is because I don't want to mix some material things in the relationship, I think this will be fairer to the two people, and I won't quarrel over money.
And from a selfish point of view, I am also more confident in this sentimental sentiment, anyway, I didn't take advantage of him, I spent everything I earned.
Although talking about money hurts feelings, money is always involved in the relationship between men and women, and at this time I think it is problematic to never talk about money.
-
Hello dear I think this problem, there is no doubt that it needs to be AA system.
First of all, to be able to start a blind date, whether it is introduced by relatives or friends, in the final analysis, it is also through the consent of both parties to reach a meeting, that is to say, blind date is completely voluntary. Therefore, when two wishful people sit together, there is no difference between the sexes, and the two people are completely equal in their relationship, so they should regard each other as friends for the first time, and there should be no problem of one party taking advantage of the other. In other words, since two strangers who are willing to make an appointment for a dinner, they should not owe each other, and the AA system is the best choice.
Secondly, if you don't have feelings for this blind date, it means that there is no possibility for continued development between you, as a woman, you should calculate the money with the other party clearly, and don't let others feel that since you don't have the idea of continuing to talk, you still have to take advantage of the other party. It can be said that if you let your blind date pay for this meal, you become a person who rubs the meal, and the relationship between you will be unequal from this time on, and it is very likely that the other party will imagine you as a frivolous person, and you should show your attitude through this meal, and tell the other party that you are not a person who likes to take advantage of others. Thirdly, if you have feelings for each other because of this first meeting, you should also AA at the final checkout, even if the man pays first, you should ask for a transfer to transfer the other half of the money to him.
Maybe the other party won't want it, but you should behave like this, so as not to let the other party think that you are a greedy person. If you want to meet more times in the future and get to know each other slowly, you should leave a good impression on each other for the first time.
Finally, if the woman has feelings for the man for the first time, and feels that it is possible to get along with the orange after another dinner, she needs the AA system even more, and maybe she can take the initiative to pay the bill. Originally, in this meeting, the woman's feelings for the man were more obvious, so she needed to take the initiative to "seize the opportunity", in order to leave a better influence in the boy's heart, and for the next time he invited the boy out for dinner, he was not good at shirking. Moreover, it is not easy for everyone to earn money, and it should not be said that it is natural for boys to pay, but we should still understand each other more.
Actually, the AA system or the boy pays, but it's all voluntary, but this kind of thing about money, or two people who meet for the first time, it's better to calculate it clearly.
We should not take it for granted that men should spend money, and men should be gentlemanly, but that does not mean that women should take it for granted that they should enjoy a "no-cost" lunch. Blind date was originally based on the principle of mutual equality, and two people who would not know each other before formed a dinner for the first time, and it was reasonable that the AA system should be aa.
-
I think that under normal circumstances, the man should pay for the first blind date.
1. Customs and habits may be different from place to place.
Under normal circumstances, if a man and a woman meet for the first time, if they do not have a certain emotional foundation and are willing to continue to understand and develop a relationship, they will not eat together, and they can eat together, which means that two people have a certain emotional foundation and may eventually come together. In this case, the boy should take the initiative to pay.
If two people meet and don't talk together, and there is no basis for continued development, it is best not to eat together. Even if it is time to eat, you need to eat together, the best way is to AA system, so that there will be no who owes whom, of course, if either party is willing to pay, it is okay, not necessarily the man has to pay.
2. It is not the purpose for men and women to meet and eat, but the purpose of the bureau is to be able to continue to communicate.
Eating is also an important way to understand each other, as a man should take the initiative to learn to be considerate of girls, and taking the initiative to buy is also a respect for each other, which can show a responsible person as a man should have the strength, and can not become friends in the future, can not come together, as a normal interaction between people, a light meal can not suffer much loss. On the contrary, it can show that this person is generous, not a person with a small belly, often small things can see a person's character and character.
In reality, there are still some girls who don't really want to find a partner but are under family pressure, perfunctory blind dates, and it's best not to eat together when you meet such people, delay time, and waste money and effort. A very small number of strange women cheat on blind dates to eat and drink, and even make wine trusts, deliberately deceiving boys to go to high-end hotels to consume and profit from them. When encountering such a person, thirty-six strategies are the best policy.
Not a penny can be spent for her.
It's about love, right? Everyone wants to stay in love with their lover, but it's not realistic. There are only two results of love, one is to slowly fade or find that you can't get along and then the two people separate; There is also a combination, when love will slowly turn into family affection. >>>More
Long-distance relationships. It's more difficult.
Mainly by moral support and. >>>More
It's not the old society anymore, although the problem of love and marriage is a certain right to suggest, but there is absolutely no right to decide, you have to figure this out, as long as you are adults, you can call the shots, whether legally or emotionally, this makes sense, so you have to grasp it yourself, since you like it, since you love, then don't let it slip out of your hands!
He doesn't necessarily don't love you. At least he was an emotional person, and he loved his parents very much. Won't give up easily for something. >>>More
Personally, I think it's okay to pull. As long as you genuinely like her. And she genuinely likes you, too. >>>More