The difference between the cabinet system of the Ming Dynasty and the prime minister system of the p

Updated on history 2024-02-25
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The Sui Dynasty formally established a system of three provinces and six ministries, and the governors of the three provinces were all ministers, and at the same time, the three dukes and three divisions also participated in the government and were also prime ministers.

    The three-province system in the Tang Dynasty was characterized by the transformation to two provinces and one province soon after its establishment. The impetus for this change was the imperial power's control over the imperial power and the improvement of administrative efficiency. The separation of powers among the three provinces will inevitably lead to drawbacks such as mutual conflict and low efficiency.

    The three provinces are jointly engaged in deliberation and office, and the functions of the three provinces are gradually becoming mixed and integrated.

    In the Song Dynasty, although the name of the three provinces always existed, they were already mixed into one province. At the same time, due to the establishment of the Privy Council and the Three Divisions, the prime minister's military and financial powers were deprived, and the three-province system existed in name only.

    In the Yuan Dynasty, the Governor General of Zhongshu Province was in charge of the three powers, the military, and the Imperial History Observatory.

    At the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, there was no Zhongshu order, and the six departments of the province were still unified by Zhongshu, and the chief was called the prime minister. In the thirteenth year of Hongwu in the Ming Dynasty, Hu Weiyong was punished, the province of Zhongshu and the prime minister were abolished, and the six ministries were directly responsible to the emperor. At this point, the three provinces of the three-province six-ministry system were completely abolished.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The Cabinet only has the power to vote, and the Prime Minister has direct executive power. The Che cabinet has always been not a statutory unit, but only an adviser to the emperor, while the prime minister is a statutory ** official position.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Reason: Because after the Ming Dynasty abolished the prime minister system, the whole country was managed by the emperor alone, and the emperor set up a cabinet to assist the emperor in handling state affairs in order to reduce the burden.

    Differences: The Ming Dynasty cabinet was not a statutory body and had no powers, but only assisted the emperor in handling state affairs; And the prime minister is the first statutory body, and has huge power, and can even interfere with the emperor's political affairs, it is not so simple to assist.

    The prime minister can play a dual role within the centralized system of China's feudal society, which can assist the emperor and help the emperor deal with government affairs and decision-making secrets; It is also possible to threaten the monarchy due to excessive power, thus forming a contradiction between the monarchy and the relative power.

    After Ming Taizu abolished the prime minister system, although the contradiction between the monarch could be solved, it would inevitably lead to an increase in the burden on the emperor, and military affairs were decided by the emperor personally, which was inevitably biased and hasty.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The cabinet of the Ming Dynasty was only the secretary and adviser to the emperor, and there were only the first assistants.

    It has a certain right to vote, and others only have the right to propose and discuss.

    The power of the theory of power does not have the power to directly deal with government affairs, and the letter approved by the cabinet must be approved by the emperor before it can take effect, but the right to approve the red is in the hands of the celebrant and supervisor; The prime minister, on the other hand, can exercise power independently and manage the affairs of the state, except for major matters that are reported to the emperor for ruling, and can make his own decisions. It can really be said that one person is below ten thousand people; Therefore, compared with the cabinet, the cabinet has more power and has more independent decision-making power.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The prime minister system has existed in China for a long time, but the power of the prime minister varies from era to era. For example, the prime minister of the Qin Dynasty was under one person and above ten thousand. However, by the time of the six-ministry system in the three provinces of the Sui and Tang dynasties, the number of prime ministers increased and their power was weakened.

    The prime minister of the Song Dynasty was basically set aside. Until the Ming Dynasty was completely abolished. The cabinet system of the Ming Dynasty originated after the abolition of the prime minister in the Ming Dynasty to reduce the workload of the emperor, and it was an integral part of the imperial power.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The Ming and Qing cabinets were the emperor's advisers, or secretariats, and controlled all major state affairs, so their powers were great, but their official positions were very small, and the behavior of the cabinet was strictly restricted.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    There is only one prime minister, while there are many people in the cabinet. So the prime minister has a lot of power.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The system of the Ming Dynasty was better, it can only be said that way.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    After the cabinet system was changed, the power was smaller, but the eunuchs had more power.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The difference between the prime minister system and the cabinet system:

    Under the prime minister system, the prime minister is given decision-making power by the system, and his position is very consolidated. However, the cabinet was only an advisory body to the emperor's chamberlain, and had no decision-making power of its own. Although there are cases where the power of the cabinet is wielded, its power does not come from the system and its position, but from the personal support and trust of the supreme ruler.

    Once it falls out of favor, its status plummets. Therefore, although some people believe that the first assistant of the Ming Dynasty was the prime minister who was re-established in disguise, his power is no longer the same as that of the previous prime minister, let alone restraining the imperial power.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The purpose of the cabinet was to strengthen the imperial power, and the members of the cabinet were no longer prime ministers and had no decision-making power.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Ming Taizu Zhu Yuanzhang abolished the prime minister and set up six ministries. Ming Chengzu Zhu Di because the emperor had too many things to handle, and his personal energy was limited, he began to set up a cabinet as an advisory body to the emperor, and Xie Jin, a famous genius in the Ming Dynasty, was one of the first cabinet members. At this time, the cabinet was all 4 or 5 grades, and although the status was high, the official rank was very low.

    In the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Di's grandson, Ming Xuanzong and Zhu Zhanji, because of his personal energy, he was more limited. Therefore, the imperial power was divided into the right to approve the red and the right to vote. The right to approve the red is approved by the eunuch who is the celebrant and the eunuch, and the right to draft the vote is in the hands of the cabinet.

    At this time, the cabinet was generally held by university scholars. The tradition of not being able to enter the cabinet without entering the Hanlin Temple began at this time. And after the fall of the Ming Dynasty, the Qing Dynasty also adopted the cabinet system.

    It's just that the name is a little special. During the Kangxi period, several people in the study were the actual cabinet. To the Yongzheng period, the military aircraft department was the actual cabinet.

    It was not until the end of the Qing Dynasty that the New Deal in 1909 abolished the Military Aircraft Department. Began to elect a cabinet, and in essence there was still royal control.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    There are advancements, but there are also limitations. The cabinet of the Ming Dynasty first ensured the normal operation of government affairs, for example, the Jiajing and Wanli emperors rarely went to court after the middle period, but due to the existence of the cabinet, the operation of various affairs of the state was still normal. The Ming Dynasty gave many people the impression that there were more faint monarchs, but the stability of the Ming Dynasty was definitely at the forefront of the dynasties, which can be attributed to the cabinet.

    However, the cabinet of the Ming Dynasty still served the imperial power, which was very different from that of Western capitalist countries. My theoretical level is not high, so I understand it this way.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    There is a progressive side, but it is limited by the development of productive forces.

    If there was no Qing Dynasty, maybe China's development would be better!

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    I don't know what the history books say.

    But I think it's still great overall. The modern Western cabinet system has emerged.

    It was the prototype of the prime minister's system. At that time, the Prime Minister of the Cabinet was actually somewhat similar to the current Prime Minister. It has reference significance for the development of political systems in later generations.

    However, because the Ming Dynasty later appeared a number of emperors who ascended the throne at a young age and had no intention of political affairs, and the feudal forces were too strong, the cabinet gradually became a tool for party struggle.

Related questions