Which is better, 70D or xe1? In terms of picture quality.

The control must be 70D good,But the picture quality must be XE1 good,If there is a real machine,You can compare,The picture quality is absolutely invincible rabbit level,The high sense is not generally strong,3200Rest assured,6400It is also very good。 If you have used both machines, you will agree with me, saying that the 70D picture quality is good mirrorless has not been touched, the concept is still stuck in the last century, thinking that SLR is professional! In other words, I've been eating ashes for a long time.

Canon 70D is good, Canon 70D uses an APS-C sensor with 40.3 million effective pixels, and the effective imaging point is 20.2 million pixels. In addition, the new sensor enables high-speed continuous shooting of up to 7 frames and seconds with 8-channel high-speed reading. The Canon 60D uses an APS-C sensor with 18 million effective pixels, which performs well at high sensitivity and is paired with DigiC 4 generation image processing.

Canon, Fuji has only been doing micro-mirrors for a short time, and the technology is not mature.

Canon 70d is good, I'm going to buy 600d because I don't have enough money.

It's definitely 70D, and it's good for color imaging or something.

I personally prefer the Canon 70D

The accuracy of the focus of the main camera will not exist in the situation that the landlord said,In general, the overall performance of the Canon 70D is still very good,It is recommended that the landlord can use it with confidence。

Let's start with positioning. At the beginning of its release, the positioning of the 7D was similar to that of the Nikon D300, the top of the APS machine, so Canon used an all-magnesium aluminum alloy body similar to the 5D on the 7D. The 70D is an advanced SLR, so it is a plastic body, and the cost of the body is much higher.

There is also a shutter, and the continuous shooting of 7D 8fps also has certain requirements for the shutter cost. There are also differences between the viewfinders.

In addition, Canon lowered the production of 7D a long time ago, so many JS hands are actually under pressure for a long time. The 7D turnaround is even lower than the 5D3.

Buy 70d honestly, buy 7d is better than add a full pair.

Which one to start with depends on what you value more?

7D is a speed machine, the advantage is the continuous shooting speed, the texture of the all-alloy body, and of course7D as the positioning of the half-frame flagship machine (obviously not a volume model), this positioning is to put it bluntly, you love to buy or not. People who like it don't think too much about the difference in performance and picture quality, after all, the difference is not very big.

70D is a large-market, volume-oriented model, and the performance indicators in all aspects are more reliable and balanced. Meet the needs of most consumers. That is, the so-called cost-effective.

Personally, I think 70D is enough for the average user, and the size, weight, and performance are very good.

7D is more suitable for those customers who "have the pursuit" of texture and attach great importance to positioning.

The positioning is different, just as the Nikon D7100 has better image quality than the D300S, but the former has a lower positioning than the latter (officially). I'm Nikon, and I don't know much about Canon, but there is a certain reference for Nikon's Canon siblings. The D300S shoots 8 frames per second, the D7100 is 7 frames, the D300S shutter release time is seconds, the D7100 is the second, the 7D is the second, the D300S spot metering area is 2%, and the D7100 is 3%.

In addition, quasi-professional aircraft such as the D300s and 7D (back then) had unmatched handling and positioning.

caused by factors that determine the quality of the picture. Modern digital SLR uses the materials and functions used to price the money, and it is graded according to people's shopping mentality, all for commercial hype, and the actual picture quality is not much different.

The key to determining the image quality is 1: ** processing chip (calculation method) 2: image sensor (density, arrangement is the most critical) 3: lens (resolution, level and color reproduction).

The newer the product calculation method is newer and more scientific. The new sensor is more advanced, so the image quality will be improved, but it is not easy to realize, such as our most commonly used display viewing, the display only has an 8-bit color range, which does not fully reflect all levels. From adjustment to output, many links of paper will affect the true performance of picture quality.

So the equipment is just enough, there is money to buy the most expensive, and there is no money to buy the latest.

The 70D uses a new generation of image sensors, and the focus is stronger, and the processor is also advanced (the DigiC5+ is about three times faster than the DigiC5 used in the 700D), and the natural image quality is better.

CMOS is the same, and there is no difference in shooting effect.

The reason why it is expensive and high is reflected in the autofocus, continuous shooting response, body control performance, viewfinder and other aspects.

When the lens is the same, the shooting quality is the same.

Speaking of autofocus alone, regardless of whether the focus point is strong or not, 1D can autofocus on a lens with an aperture of 8, which is a cut above the normal body in many cases. People can focus on it, but we just can't shoot it.

If you don't care about these performances, then there's no need to chase the fuselage Of course, full-frame and half-frame are watersheds, and there is a difference in image quality, you should know.

First, the positioning is different, 7D belongs to the quasi-professional level, suitable for reporters, and is characterized by lightness and continuous shooting speed. The 70D belongs to the mid-range, suitable for home use, and is characterized by multi-function and good camera.

Second, in terms of performance, the 70D with low positioning is stronger, because it has just been listed, but it is not as good as 7D in professional control

So the home is definitely 70D, the price is lower and the functions are more comprehensive, especially the camera is very strong. At home, the 18-135 head is enough, and then you can play it and then go to other heads.

The two cameras are a notch apart. 7D is a top-of-the-line half-frame camera with fast speed and good image quality, which is suitable for shooting sports and fast-moving objects. The 70D is a half-width mid-range machine with balanced performance. It's 7d if it's not bad for money, and it's 70d if it's enough.

There's nothing to say.,Of course, the home is EOS 70D,7D is positioning sports outdoor news photography,The body is relatively strong,But technically it's worse than 70D。

First,70D is an upgraded version of 60DSecond,70D has no body stabilization,Canon is the whole series of lens stabilizationso,Don't mislead newcomers Canon 70D completes the explosion 7D,Thank you for the points。

It is recommended that 70d is enough for home use, 7d ** is expensive, and it is not so high-end for home use

The home one is okay, mainly depending on your photography needs.

7D design belongs to professional-grade SLR, and most people have the misconception that full-frame is professional-grade.

The 70D design is a quasi-professional SLR, which can be close to the professional grade in terms of continuous shooting speed and use.

7D was launched earlier, and the machine performance is stable. The imaging effect is still better than 70d.

If it is not bad money, it is recommended to buy 7D. It is recommended that you go to Shangxipoyou to see if it will help you buy a camera.

The selling point of 7D is that it has dual processors, which is very fast, and it is used in photojournalism and other occasions for snap-up shots.

If you are mainly shooting infants and young children at home, 7D may be more suitable, but if you are an ordinary household, the outstanding advantages of 7D are not particularly significant.

Some people have compared and said that 600D,60D,7D image quality is basically the same,This may have subjective factors,But it also reflects a certain actual situation。 Strictly speaking, the 7D focusing system should definitely be better than the 60D one, except for the obvious advantage of speed.

The camera is the overall system of the body and lens, and if the average household has a limited budget, then a lens with a higher 70D+ grade should work better than a lens with a slightly lower 7D+ grade.

Chengdu song (Zhang Ji) wild old song (Zhang Ji) title: Capital City Nanzhuang (Cui Hu).

The latter ones of JPEG are set to the size of the image quality.,RAW too.。

You better read the manual! It seems that it is a step to the sky, and it has not been used before to enter the mid-range SLR.

There is not much difference between these two machines, the image quality mainly depends on the lens, and the big difference in the image quality of the fuselage is only full-frame and half-frame.

In addition, the sales volume of these two machines is not high, because you can go to full frame with some money, so why buy this category that can't be made up.

Half-format CMOS machines are the same no matter how you choose, just look at the feel and craftsmanship, and those exaggerated new technology values are fooling.

In addition, the Canon color is soft, which is suitable for portraits, and the Nikon color reproduction is a little better, and it is harder, which is suitable for landscapes. Nikon is a little better and more solid than Canon's workmanship.